When I arrived at the station to buy a travel card, which requires printing the ticket, I found the card machine for the ticket system was offline. The barriers were open, and as the train was pulling in, I boarded without a ticket, planning to sort it out on the journey. Five minutes in, I purchased an off-peak ticket online via Trainline, which issues e-tickets. However, about 50 minutes into the journey, a Govia staff member took a witness statement, claiming I had broken the bylaw by entering the station without a valid ticket. Unfortunately, I have no proof that it was offline - I was in such a rush I didn't think. I clearly wasn't trying to evade the fare, as I bought my ticket before any inspection took place. Now, I have to wait 4-6 weeks for a letter, and it's causing me a lot of anxiety.
I’m naturally scared about conviction, but how likely will it just be a fine if my argument doesn’t stand. Will they also look at my Trainline history? I’ve done this before, get on a train and then buy a ticket usually from St Pancras to London Bridge as it’s cheaper to buy a ticket with railcard than tap in for a one way ticket.
What are your thoughts? I'm just trying to understand where I stand on this issue and what evidence may be looked at. Thanks
I’m naturally scared about conviction, but how likely will it just be a fine if my argument doesn’t stand. Will they also look at my Trainline history? I’ve done this before, get on a train and then buy a ticket usually from St Pancras to London Bridge as it’s cheaper to buy a ticket with railcard than tap in for a one way ticket.
What are your thoughts? I'm just trying to understand where I stand on this issue and what evidence may be looked at. Thanks