• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Caledonian Sleeper

Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

DavidCooper

New Member
Joined
12 Aug 2020
Messages
3
Location
LONDON
Referring back to my post #17,402 (27th Jan), it appears that 92028 was the extra 92 we were waiting for - the stock came in from Wembley with 92023+92014 and left with 92028+92014 (info from RTT). The speed from Wembley (?) to perhaps MKC was a steady 87mph (GPS app on smartphone). On my return journey on Jan 31st, again there were two 92s 92028+92043. No idea why.
 

Scotrail84

On Moderation
Joined
5 Jul 2010
Messages
2,977
Referring back to my post #17,402 (27th Jan), it appears that 92028 was the extra 92 we were waiting for - the stock came in from Wembley with 92023+92014 and left with 92028+92014 (info from RTT). The speed from Wembley (?) to perhaps MKC was a steady 87mph (GPS app on smartphone). On my return journey on Jan 31st, again there were two 92s 92028+92043. No idea why.
With that then I'm going to assume that 028 was gubbed and needed moved to Polmadie for repairs and 043 was sent down in its place to save leaving them short in London. Could also be that 028 was due an exam. Sometimes if 92s are faulty they moved to short runs such as the drawbacks in/out off Euston or put on 5C11/1C11 and 1B26/5B26 just incase of a failure so they are 'relatively' close to Polmadie.

1S26 arrived 78 late into Glasgow. Lost all its time at Carstairs. Looks like a points failure was the culprit.
 
Last edited:

paul1609

Established Member
Joined
28 Jan 2006
Messages
7,992
Location
K
Are you sure? That would imply electropneumatic braking. Nothing in the Edinburgh overrun report that I have read so far, including the diagram on p16, implies that.
Won't there have to be some sort of interlocking within the carriage sets for the power operated doors? Such as if the emergency access is operated (or the power to the same is lost) the brakes will be fully applied.
 

Scotrail84

On Moderation
Joined
5 Jul 2010
Messages
2,977
Another cancelation tonight, this time 1M11 from Glasgow. (info seen on twitter/X), a few unhappy chappies.
 

Scotrail84

On Moderation
Joined
5 Jul 2010
Messages
2,977
Partial cancellation. Service still ran in full from Carstairs.
Still a cancellation and the service ran very short formed so that means Sundays nights northbound will be impacted. read the twitter posts, passengers were still in Glasgow after midnight.
 

D6130

Established Member
Joined
12 Jan 2021
Messages
7,294
Location
West Yorkshire/Tuscany
Still a cancellation and the service ran very short formed so that means Sundays nights northbound will be impacted. read the twitter posts, passengers were still in Glasgow after midnight.
Were the Glasgow pax bussed - or special trained - to Carstairs to join the train there?
 

LoogaBarooga

Member
Joined
11 Jul 2019
Messages
253
I was on it, yeah we were taxied to Carstairs. It was all a bit of a shambles tbh, my wife and I arrived at Central at about 22.30 and even then it was obvious the train wasn't going to run.

What impact will it have on Sunday night? We're due back on that one...
 

JModulo

Member
Joined
17 Nov 2013
Messages
537
Location
67A
Still a cancellation and the service ran very short formed so that means Sundays nights northbound will be impacted. read the twitter posts, passengers were still in Glasgow after midnight.
It ran with 1 coach less. Hardly very short formed.
 

Scotrail84

On Moderation
Joined
5 Jul 2010
Messages
2,977
It ran with 1 coach less. Hardly very short formed.
Bear in mind its already short formed by 3 due to cracking and maintenance issues and 3 were 'supposedly' shunted off on depot in order for it to run.

I was on it, yeah we were taxied to Carstairs. It was all a bit of a shambles tbh, my wife and I arrived at Central at about 22.30 and even then it was obvious the train wasn't going to run.

What impact will it have on Sunday night? We're due back on that one...
Thats not surprising in the slightest. No plan B it seems.

One of the two services will be very short formed. My guess is the it will be the Lowlander that takes the hit.
 

JModulo

Member
Joined
17 Nov 2013
Messages
537
Location
67A
Bear in mind its already short formed by 3 due to cracking and maintenance issues and 3 were 'supposedly' shunted off on depot in order for it to run.


Thats not surprising in the slightest. No plan B it seems.

One of the two services will be very short formed. My guess is the it will be the Lowlander that takes the hit.
Ofcourse 3 were shunted off in a way... you can't just pick 1 coach out the middle like a Hornby set and Remove it. 1 coach removed in total.
 

Scotrail84

On Moderation
Joined
5 Jul 2010
Messages
2,977
Ofcourse 3 were shunted off in a way... you can't just pick 1 coach out the middle like a Hornby set and Remove it. 1 coach removed in total.
So thats now a rake of 11 vice what would normally be 16 if there was no issues. Thats well short, school holidays coming up too. The fleet is in dire straights. Dropping like flies. Bookings will be getting cancelled at this rate.

RTT indicates tonight highlander is formed of only 11 vehicles.

More delays. 1S25 still in Euston, its also blocking in the loco for 1S26.
 
Last edited:

Class15

Established Member
Joined
30 Dec 2021
Messages
3,096
Location
North London or Mildmay line
Empty stock 3M11 has failed/encountered a blockage at Willesden Junction and has been sitting there for 75 minutes. No idea what’s gone wrong. Local services running on the Fast lines and freight via Gospel Oak
 

Peter Mugridge

Veteran Member
Joined
8 Apr 2010
Messages
16,210
Location
Epsom
Empty stock 3M11 has failed/encountered a blockage at Willesden Junction and has been sitting there for 75 minutes. No idea what’s gone wrong. Local services running on the Fast lines and freight via Gospel Oak
It looks like it's the 92 that's failed ( 92 033 showing on Real Time Trains as being on this ); there's a 1Z99 approaching...

Screenshot below from Open Time Trains shows "FAIL" set behind 3M11 and 1Z99 appearing on the other side in Brent sidings.


1739268956888.png
 

Deepgreen

Established Member
Joined
12 Jun 2013
Messages
6,911
Location
Gomshall, Surrey
So thats now a rake of 11 vice what would normally be 16 if there was no issues. Thats well short, school holidays coming up too. The fleet is in dire straights. Dropping like flies. Bookings will be getting cancelled at this rate.

RTT indicates tonight highlander is formed of only 11 vehicles.

More delays. 1S25 still in Euston, its also blocking in the loco for 1S26.
I'm booked on the Fort William run on 11 March, so I wonder how things will be then. Perhaps they can borrow some GWR cars for an interesting rake...!

It ran with 1 coach less. Hardly very short formed.
The passengers booked in that coach can't be expected to stand in other coaches, though...
 

Meerkat

Established Member
Joined
14 Jul 2018
Messages
9,276
Any chance this thread could be split into one for service updates and one for changes to the routes/stock/operation?
 

Peter Mugridge

Veteran Member
Joined
8 Apr 2010
Messages
16,210
Location
Epsom
Any chance this thread could be split into one for service updates and one for changes to the routes/stock/operation?
I'm not sure... wouldn't the two subjects be very closely linked and we'd end up getting things posted on both threads?
 

Meerkat

Established Member
Joined
14 Jul 2018
Messages
9,276
I'm not sure... wouldn't the two subjects be very closely linked and we'd end up getting things posted on both threads?
One would be for changes to timetables, stock, product.
The other would be for all the delays and breakdowns - service updates.
imo they are quite easy to keep separate, but I’m not sure on forum policy for “I went on it, it was good but the hot water didn’t work” - I would tend toward those being service updates
 

zwk500

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Jan 2020
Messages
15,204
Location
Bristol
One would be for changes to timetables, stock, product.
The other would be for all the delays and breakdowns - service updates.
imo they are quite easy to keep separate, but I’m not sure on forum policy for “I went on it, it was good but the hot water didn’t work” - I would tend toward those being service updates
Maybe we need a whole separate subforum :D Then you could have threads for reviews, trip plans, incindents, etc, etc..
 

Meerkat

Established Member
Joined
14 Jul 2018
Messages
9,276
Maybe we need a whole separate subforum :D Then you could have threads for reviews, trip plans, incindents, etc, etc..
I wasn’t sure how strictly you separate trip reports from effectively anecdata for a ‘these trains are crap/wonderful debate.
 

CW2

Established Member
Joined
7 May 2020
Messages
2,069
Location
Crewe
I wasn’t sure how strictly you separate trip reports from effectively anecdata for a ‘these trains are crap/wonderful debate.
That's the first time I've encountered the word "Anecdata". Wonderful! Every day is a school day.
 

xotGD

Established Member
Joined
4 Feb 2017
Messages
6,821
One would be for changes to timetables, stock, product.
The other would be for all the delays and breakdowns - service updates.
imo they are quite easy to keep separate, but I’m not sure on forum policy for “I went on it, it was good but the hot water didn’t work” - I would tend toward those being service updates
You're missing the most important stuff: Gen.
 

alholmes

Member
Joined
4 Jun 2012
Messages
440
Location
London E3
One would be for changes to timetables, stock, product.
The other would be for all the delays and breakdowns - service updates.
imo they are quite easy to keep separate
Not sure these are always easy to separate, as for CS in particular a breakdown on one evening could often lead to changes to timetable or train formation the following evening.
 

johnr57

Member
Joined
29 Mar 2013
Messages
231
Hey guys, all this talk of splitting off bits of threads of the CS thread would remove its great attraction. The fact that it wanders around all over the place , interspersed with the relay of performance failures and successes , intermingled with intense discussions ( some might say disagreement) around the important topics as pillows, hot water, riviera comparisons and often banal trivia is the complete tonic after a day of Teams meetings!
I recall the original thread was stopped through excessive diversification but reborn by Essexman and I vote to keep this thread and encourage the continuation of the CS themed diversification. Long may it last
 

Top