• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Can some of the stations between Selby and Hull be closed?

Status
Not open for further replies.

HST43257

Established Member
Joined
10 Apr 2020
Messages
1,645
Location
York
Looking at some of the places along the line from Selby to Hull, they look horrendously unpopulated. I’m aware that usage of some are terribly low as well. My question is, with NPR and other express services about, can the stations of these smaller places survive?

The stations I’m really looking at are Wressle and Broomfleet. They’re on the massively upgradeable main route to York and Leeds from Hull. When I say massively upgradeable, I’m referring to how straight the route is. Surely this opens up the possibility of a 125mph plus electrification upgrade. However, if this happened, capacity for stopping services may be more limited. All of the rest of the stations are for areas with populations of over 1,000. You could argue that Eastrington (with a population of 1,200 or thereabouts) should also close, though I’m not sure about that one.

Thoughts would be appreciated please.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

DB

Guest
Joined
18 Nov 2009
Messages
5,036
The smaller stations only have a limited service anyway - can't see what would be gained by shutting any of them.

There really is no need for a 125mph mainline to Hull - it's literally the end of the line, and there isn't a huge amount of commuting in either direction.
 

HST43257

Established Member
Joined
10 Apr 2020
Messages
1,645
Location
York
The smaller stations only have a limited service anyway - can't see what would be gained by shutting any of them.

There really is no need for a 125mph mainline to Hull - it's literally the end of the line, and there isn't a huge amount of commuting in either direction.

First of all, the limited smaller station stops still take paths away, though these stations aren‘t heavily used. Is it really worth sacrificing some paths in crucial hours just to serve around 5 people a day?

With the 125mph, I think that there’s an opportunity to increase speeds, certainly between Selby and Brough. Perhaps that speed is too much but there is potential on that route in my view.
 

DB

Guest
Joined
18 Nov 2009
Messages
5,036
First of all, the limited smaller station stops still take paths away, though these stations aren‘t heavily used. Is it really worth sacrificing some paths in crucial hours just to serve around 5 people a day?

With the 125mph, I think that there’s an opportunity to increase speeds, certainly between Selby and Brough. Perhaps that speed is too much but there is potential on that route in my view.

It's not a busy line - stopping at those stations is not getting in the way of anything else.
 

4-SUB 4732

Established Member
Joined
7 Jan 2018
Messages
2,150
Definitely worth keeping Hessle, Ferriby, Brough (hardly in doubt).

Broomfleet realistically is doing nothing with it’s 2 passengers a day; Gilberdyke obviously fine.

Howden and Eastrington should basically be combined into one, possibly on the A614. Better parking, etc.

Wressle would probably end up better used by outlying villages if there was decent parking!

On the side west of Selby, you definitely need to massively increase the scope and size of South Milford. That’s a very useful pen-knife for Leeds, Selby (etc.).
 

yorksrob

Veteran Member
Joined
6 Aug 2009
Messages
41,439
Location
Yorks
It's already a pretty good service on the route for the population served.

I wouldn't close any of the stations. Actually, I'd make more use of the new Northern Leeds - Hull service to bring better links between Howden (and maybe some other deserving place along the route) and Leeds, rather than just duplicating the TPE.
 

Ianno87

Veteran Member
Joined
3 May 2015
Messages
15,214
Why bother closing stations? Please lets think long term for a change.

Trying (and failing) to think of historically lightly used stations anywhere that have significantly resurged in usage. Manea and Whittelsea spring to mind, due to having a two-hourly service introduced in 2013.
 

Bletchleyite

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Oct 2014
Messages
104,060
Location
"Marston Vale mafia"
Trying (and failing) to think of historically lightly used stations anywhere that have significantly resurged in usage. Manea and Whittelsea spring to mind, due to having a two-hourly service introduced in 2013.

Any with tourist potential might. These ones (which are not dissimilar to Hoscar, New Lane and Bescar Lane) probably not.
 

Purple Orange

On Moderation
Joined
26 Dec 2019
Messages
3,458
Location
The North
I’m intrigued as to how this idea plays with ‘levelling up’. Hull seems to be one of those places, like the Blackburn’s, Burnley’s and Rotherham’s of this world where the ‘levelling up’ agenda seems to fit. This boils down to a question of what does Hull, Selby and the communities that exist in between need the most? Faster services to London, Manchester and Liverpool? Or more frequent services to Leeds & York? Station usage might be low because there is a crap service to begin with. Improve the offering and people may make the switch from car to train perhaps.
 

DB

Guest
Joined
18 Nov 2009
Messages
5,036
Or more frequent services to Leeds & York? Station usage might be low because there is a crap service to begin with. Improve the offering and people may make the switch from car to train perhaps.

Yes, I think that's true - the services between Hull and York in particular is not great.
 

Ben Bow

Member
Joined
20 Sep 2018
Messages
342
.....

With the 125mph, I think that there’s an opportunity to increase speeds, certainly between Selby and Brough. Perhaps that speed is too much but there is potential on that route in my view.

When Howden to Ferriby was resignalled the intention was to increase the line speed generally, and in places to 100mph (currently 75, or 90 for sprinters). However the cost of modifying the level crossings for higher speeds, especially the AHB's, was deemed too expensive in relation to the time saved.
 

Purple Orange

On Moderation
Joined
26 Dec 2019
Messages
3,458
Location
The North
Styal is one with tourist potential - you have Quarry Bank Mill nearby plus nice countryside walks down the river. It's a bit like Strines in that regard.

Styal will (maybe, perhaps) be getting tram-train between the airport & Wilmslow, which would be 5 tph in all likelihood. For local residents on that stop it will be more of a shuttle service to the town centre (big tick) or to the airport station for a fast connections to Manchester, London, Scotland, rest of the north etc. It’s a pretty place and if it has a 5 tph shuttle, I’d certainly consider moving there!
 

Western Lord

Member
Joined
17 Mar 2014
Messages
939
Looking at some of the places along the line from Selby to Hull, they look horrendously unpopulated. I’m aware that usage of some are terribly low as well. My question is, with NPR and other express services about, can the stations of these smaller places survive?

The stations I’m really looking at are Wressle and Broomfleet. They’re on the massively upgradeable main route to York and Leeds from Hull. When I say massively upgradeable, I’m referring to how straight the route is. Surely this opens up the possibility of a 125mph plus electrification upgrade. However, if this happened, capacity for stopping services may be more limited. All of the rest of the stations are for areas with populations of over 1,000. You could argue that Eastrington (with a population of 1,200 or thereabouts) should also close, though I’m not sure about that one.

Thoughts would be appreciated please.
The reason that the line is straight is that it runs through flat countryside. This means loads of level crossings (20 odd between Selby and Brough), not really compatible with a 125mph railway.
 

Halifaxlad

Established Member
Joined
5 Apr 2018
Messages
1,654
Location
The White Rose County
There really is no need for a 125mph mainline to Hull - it's literally the end of the line, and there isn't a huge amount of commuting in either direction.

Maybe if it operated at high speed then they may be more commuting ?

The reason that the line is straight is that it runs through flat countryside. This means loads of level crossings (20 odd between Selby and Brough), not really compatible with a 125mph railway.

In a presentation not so long ago Tim Wood, director of NPR did hit upon how straight this line was and the number of crossings. From what he was saying it looks like Transport for the North may have aspirations to remove most if not all of these crossings.
 

JKF

Member
Joined
29 May 2019
Messages
973
I travelled on this line a lot for work in the early 2000s. 1hr Leeds-Hull didn’t seem that bad a time for the distance.

At the time I remember they were removing an extra track, somewhere towards the Hull end. Was the line originally quadrupled or tripled and could that provide capacity for stopping services? I think this was from Brough onwards or possibly from the junction with the Goole line, or may have just been a long goods loop somewhere around the old smelter site and my memory is muddled!
 

Halifaxlad

Established Member
Joined
5 Apr 2018
Messages
1,654
Location
The White Rose County
If you wanted a faster line between Leeds & Hull you may be better reopening or rather rebuilding the the line from Selby to Market Weighton and constructing a brand new line around MW to Beverley, that could easily follow the aligment of the A614. Due to that Selby to Market Weighton was as straight as the line from Selby to Brough I reckon with no crossings, you could easily get up to 140 mph.

Before anyone comments along the lines of 'you don't need that speed' don't forget NPR is aiming at reducing journey times across from Hull to Liverpool in the same way TRU is being progressed, improving bits of line as opposed to trying to raise the speed of the whole line from end to end!

Owning to my crayonist tendencies I also drawn a map to make it easier to visualize.
 

DB

Guest
Joined
18 Nov 2009
Messages
5,036
Maybe if it operated at high speed then they may be more commuting ?

You need to consider the type of place it is - Hull is a fairly self-contained city, and there isn't a huge amout of longer-distance commuting by any means, and faster train services are unlikely to change that. It is also expensive to get to any of the nearest cities (York and Leeds), so only viable with reasonably well-paid jobs.
 

yorksrob

Veteran Member
Joined
6 Aug 2009
Messages
41,439
Location
Yorks
Hull does have some excellent pubs, which are a draw in their own right.

Probably not quite enough to justify upgrading the line though !
 

NoMorePacers

Established Member
Joined
18 Feb 2016
Messages
1,392
Location
Humberside
The only stations between Selby and Hull that might be worthy of a closure consideration are Broomfleet, Eastrington and Wressle - the others are reasonably patronised and in my opinion don't warrant a more permanent service reduction from their current levels. However, perhaps considering other options for the aforementioned 3 before outright closure - such as dropping them down to request stops - should be done if there is a will to reduce their service level.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top