if I buy a saver return (not a supersaver or an anytyime return, i.e. the mid range ticket) from, say, Taunton to Paddington, use the outward ticket on a train for which a supersaver ticket is valid, but then for the return journey there are 3 options:
1. use on a train which a saver return is valid. My ticket is valid.
2. use on a train for which only anytime tickets are valid. I believe I would have to buy an upgrade for the ticket to allow travel on an anytime ticket. I think, but correct me if wrong, the upgrade would be the difference in cost between an anytime return and a saver return? No problem here, I travel on a more expensive train, I must pay the difference.
3. I return on a train for which a supersaver ticket is valid. Clearly my saver ticket is valid, but can I claim a refund of the difference between a saver and a supersaver return ticket? I'm sure the answer would be no, but this seems to be unfair on the passenger. If I travel on a more expensive train, I pay, if I travel on a cheaper train, the railway keeps the money.
Any experts care to comment?
1. use on a train which a saver return is valid. My ticket is valid.
2. use on a train for which only anytime tickets are valid. I believe I would have to buy an upgrade for the ticket to allow travel on an anytime ticket. I think, but correct me if wrong, the upgrade would be the difference in cost between an anytime return and a saver return? No problem here, I travel on a more expensive train, I must pay the difference.
3. I return on a train for which a supersaver ticket is valid. Clearly my saver ticket is valid, but can I claim a refund of the difference between a saver and a supersaver return ticket? I'm sure the answer would be no, but this seems to be unfair on the passenger. If I travel on a more expensive train, I pay, if I travel on a cheaper train, the railway keeps the money.
Any experts care to comment?