northwichcat
Veteran Member
Of course that used to be reversed - the South got knackered, ageing, rotting and uncrashworthy Mk1s, and the North got new 150s, 156s and 158s. And Pacers, but people forget how run-down the old Mk1 DMU fleet was actually getting.
The North didn't fully get rid of slam door stock on local/regional services until 2003 and the South got brand new 159s, 317s, 319s, 321s, 322s, 442s, 455s, 456s and possibly others in the 80s and very early 90s. Yes the South had a higher number of old trains but given how many more carriages they have did they have a higher proportion of old carriages?
And if the South's old EMUs were so bad why did Metro use some as a short-term fix in the Leeds area prior to the 333s being built? (If you believe some people it was the introduction of old 308s that sparked growth!)