gabrielhj07
Member
ThanksDoubtful. A five car will be taken out of service if less than three engines are running.
I dread to think how slowly it would run on only one of five!
ThanksDoubtful. A five car will be taken out of service if less than three engines are running.
I dread to think how slowly it would run on only one of five!
Although on far shorter routes than the other two members of the Voyager family. That said, I think they’re wonderful trains.The 222s are worked very hard so this isn't surprising
Although on far shorter routes than the other two members of the Voyager family. That said, I think they’re wonderful trains.
Has the dirt and grime from inside and outside these horrid units finally started to impact the engines?It seems like there are a few cancellations due to faults on 222s today according to EMRs status checker.
Sorry am I missing something here - the 180s are still in service with EMR? If so how long for? I was still under the impression they were withdrawn at the May timetable change.3 of the 4 180s out today - one of them is not on the extra diagrams - e.g. 180110 is on https://www.realtimetrains.co.uk/service/gb-nr:G69912/2023-05-29/detailed#allox_id=0 and https://www.realtimetrains.co.uk/service/gb-nr:G69847/2023-05-29/detailed
It seems like there are a few cancellations due to faults on 222s today according to EMRs status checker.
They are ok, but they suffer from the same problems as the Voyagers, not enough seats and the ridiculously shallow overhead racks which doesn't fit anythingAlthough on far shorter routes than the other two members of the Voyager family. That said, I think they’re wonderful trains.
Sorry am I missing something here - the 180s are still in service with EMR? If so how long for? I was still under the impression they were withdrawn at the May timetable change.
Lease expires at the end of the month.Sorry am I missing something here - the 180s are still in service with EMR? If so how long for? I was still under the impression they were withdrawn at the May timetable change.
I used to be quite taken aback when I lived in Sheffield when I'd be arriving ex-London (on time) only to be battling my way off as everyone's trying to shove their way on for a departure back south in <15 minutes.Shorter routes, but AIUI more intensively worked than the others, with shorter turnarounds and higher average speeds, certainly than XC’s fleet.
They are absolutely flogged. Big shoes for the 810s to fill.
I heard somewhere that 222103 is running on 1/5 engines, is this true?
It has, however, spent the whole day as part of a 10 car formation with 222010. No idea about how many engines it’s on thoughDoubtful. A five car will be taken out of service if less than three engines are running.
I dread to think how slowly it would run on only one of five!
It has, however, spent the whole day as part of a 10 car formation with 222010. No idea about how many engines it’s on though
Good lord. Probably wouldn't get up any hills whatsoever.Doubtful. A five car will be taken out of service if less than three engines are running.
I dread to think how slowly it would run on only one of five!
Just for today - train crew aboard said that it was to provide extra capacity in light of Sheffield Wednesday playing at Wembley today. Might as well make use of them whilst the lease is still active.Sorry am I missing something here - the 180s are still in service with EMR? If so how long for? I was still under the impression they were withdrawn at the May timetable change.
A northbound 10-car service made up of 010 and 103 called into Loughborough at around 7:30pm. From re-watching the video, sounds like all the engines on 103 were running and 010 was running on 4 of 5.I heard somewhere that 222103 is running on 1/5 engines, is this true?
When it called into Loughborough at around 7:30pm, it seemed like all 103’s engines were running and 010 had 4 out of 5 running.It has, however, spent the whole day as part of a 10 car formation with 222010. No idea about how many engines it’s on though
I stand by the fact that these units are past their time and have clearly all manner of breakdowns but the flexibility that EMR were able to show today was great, so it is a bit of a shame that these units are not around to provide this kind of relief in the future (particularly for Skegness but in general to cover). Let's hope we can get the 810s in without too much of a fuss...Lease expires at the end of the month.
Well indeedHow the tables have turned
That's both surprising and not surprising at the same time, if that makes sense.Shorter routes, but AIUI more intensively worked than the others, with shorter turnarounds and higher average speeds, certainly than XC’s fleet.
They are absolutely flogged. Big shoes for the 810s to fill.
The CrossCountry Voyagers share that route too, between Derby and Sheffield, but you are right on all your points.Though the MML equally has its challenges set out for the 222s, with it being up hill all the way from the outskirts of Chesterfield to Sheffield.
I caught the last ever southbound 180 service with my son this evening. Kept it as a surprise for him and the first thing he asked - after getting over the excitement of seeing one - was why the carriages had been de-branded!
This particular one was 180110 and, IMO, it was running pretty well for its last hurrah. The repaired car looked absolutely gleaming.
Overall, I’m sad to see them go*; so I’m really glad we got this last, rather unexpected, go on one.
A couple of pics from Leicester station attached, one showing a de-branded carriage.
* I know that many will not miss the 180s one bit; but they’re special to my son (they’re his favourite type), so for that reason they’re special to me too.
Will do! To be honest, I didn’t think they were that bad above the bogies - the interior was very tired admittedly; however they felt comfortable. Others will no doubt disagree in terms of having anything positive to say about that (and indeed the trains as a whole); however I think the various grievances about seating on newer stock mean that the 180 seating wasn’t actually that bad.Say hi to your son for me – when 180s first ran with FGR 20-odd years ago they were my favourites. A little noiser inside than an HST but rode as well with better cabins, and were much faster off the line.
Complaints about the 180s have always been about the unreliability, the interior is fine (though the roof mounted both containing a dot matrix PIS screen is rather ugly).Will do! To be honest, I didn’t think they were that bad above the bogies - the interior was very tired admittedly; however they felt comfortable. Others will no doubt disagree in terms of having anything positive to say about that (and indeed the trains as a whole); however I think the various grievances about seating on newer stock mean that the 180 seating wasn’t actually that bad.
I agree that above the solebar the 180 is a very nice train. Only ridden in then twice and my memorable journey was Bristol Parkway - Swindon in one on a hot summers day. I stepped into the vestibule at Bristol Parkway and the cool air was just wonderful. I also recall a nice bright airy interior of a fullsize coach - reminiscent then of a Mk3 coach, rather than the airline "tube" of the voyager I had just arrived on.Will do! To be honest, I didn’t think they were that bad above the bogies - the interior was very tired admittedly; however they felt comfortable. Others will no doubt disagree in terms of having anything positive to say about that (and indeed the trains as a whole); however I think the various grievances about seating on newer stock mean that the 180 seating wasn’t actually that bad.
Like I say it’s possible but highly unlikely. Should just keep the HSTs as DaFT obviously don’t know or care about how dire XC capacity is!
I know they are dictated to by the government but I’m sure we will agree the instructions don’t make a lot of sense when cross country have for a long time suffered with severe overcrowding.The DfT are only following instructions from the treasury…
Pretty much since 4 car voyagers replaced 7 coach HSTs and LHCS in erm 2001/2002.I know they are dictated to by the government but I’m sure we will agree the instructions don’t make a lot of sense when cross country have for a long time suffered with severe overcrowding.
I know and 22 years later it still hasn’t been solved. It wasn’t too bad when the core was hourly instead of half-hourly up until the May timetable change just gone and now the HSTs are going I can’t see that making things better!Pretty much since 4 car voyagers replaced 7 coach HSTs and LHCS in erm 2001/2002.
Unfortunately just what happens when you have a ROSCO and TOC leasing set up.QSK19 noted above that 180110’s repaired car ‘looked gleaming’. Out of interest, what work was done on this coach?
I seem to recall that it was reported to have suffered corrosion. Was the recent work on it extensive?
Presumably EMR was obliged to return it to the leasing company in a certain condition but it seems crazy that lots of money would be spent given the remote probability of the unit being found another TOC.
EMR will not of paid as the corrosion issues have been known of prior to EMR being involved so it's either Alstom or Angel that pick up the cost. Alstom will say they didn't maintain them and Angel will say the trains you did maintain had issues so just one big bun fight.QSK19 noted above that 180110’s repaired car ‘looked gleaming’. Out of interest, what work was done on this coach?
I seem to recall that it was reported to have suffered corrosion. Was the recent work on it extensive?
Presumably EMR was obliged to return it to the leasing company in a certain condition but it seems crazy that lots of money would be spent given the remote probability of the unit being found another TOC.