Hey All
A little query after a journey I took this afternoon on a 333 from Shipley to Leeds.
After departing Shipley, the screens said, as expected, that the next stop was Leeds and that the train terminated (333's say it slightly differently but that's the jist anyway).
However, on approach to Leeds, the screens continued to say the same but the annoucement was "We are now on the approach to Connelly (spelling?) where this train terminates" - it actually repeated it a couple of times.
Cue a short pause and then a (probably slightly bemused) guard came on (after probably giving the computer an earful
) and said that we weren't arriving into Connelly (this got a bit of a laugh from the other passengers) and that we were on the approach to Leeds. The screens still said the correct station.
On looking since, the only station of such a name is in Ireland and there is no such station in England, let alone in Yorkshire, so, why on earth did it decide to announce Connelly as the next stop? Also, given that the services go nowhere near, why is such a station actually recorded on their system?
A little query after a journey I took this afternoon on a 333 from Shipley to Leeds.
After departing Shipley, the screens said, as expected, that the next stop was Leeds and that the train terminated (333's say it slightly differently but that's the jist anyway).
However, on approach to Leeds, the screens continued to say the same but the annoucement was "We are now on the approach to Connelly (spelling?) where this train terminates" - it actually repeated it a couple of times.
Cue a short pause and then a (probably slightly bemused) guard came on (after probably giving the computer an earful

On looking since, the only station of such a name is in Ireland and there is no such station in England, let alone in Yorkshire, so, why on earth did it decide to announce Connelly as the next stop? Also, given that the services go nowhere near, why is such a station actually recorded on their system?