• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Class 701 'Aventra' trains for South Western Railway: progress updates

Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Joined
2 Jun 2023
Messages
798
Location
Richmond
A shorter training 701 course with Driver Open Guard Close DOGC is being introduced, although SWR still desire to run with Driver Open Driver Close DODC in the future. The amended courses start in a couple of weeks, with DOGC as the method of operation the week after.
Hopefully this speeds up the introduction, or at least means the existing diagrams can be run more reliably with more drivers available.
 

MrJeeves

Established Member
Associate Staff
Senior Fares Advisor
Joined
28 Aug 2015
Messages
3,347
Location
Burgess Hill
Except they are required to do that on SWR anyway even when drivers are closing the doors.
Do they have to peer outside and dodge the closing door, or do they retain local door control similar to non-safety-critical Southern OBS staff?
 

TEW

Established Member
Joined
16 May 2008
Messages
6,060
So they have to be at a control panel even if they're not going to operate it?
Required to operate a local door at each station and check for any assistance requirements on the platform.
 

TEW

Established Member
Joined
16 May 2008
Messages
6,060
Do they have to peer outside and dodge the closing door, or do they retain local door control similar to non-safety-critical Southern OBS staff?
Have to operate a local door at each station. The driver is required to check it is operated and wait for it to be deactivated prior to starting the dispatch process.

They're effectively just like GTR on-board supervisors at that point!
If DCO were operating it was a similar set up, although with the ability to revert to guard dispatch as required, which has now morphed in to everywhere, for now at least.
 

43066

On Moderation
Joined
24 Nov 2019
Messages
11,545
Location
London
Surely the advantage of DO/DC is to the passengers and the train operator? It means that the on-board staff (whatever job title they have been given) isn't taken away from what, in 2025, are their core tasks - revenue protection and all forms of passenger assistance - to get to a the control panel.

The core task of the guard role is safety, ahead of anything else. That hasn’t changed, irrespective of what year it is.
 

InOban

Established Member
Joined
12 Mar 2017
Messages
4,388
obviously if a situation arises safety takes priority over everything else. But the majority of their time?
 

norbitonflyer

Established Member
Joined
24 Mar 2020
Messages
3,823
Location
SW London
How many 701s are in service today does anyone know? All 6 or not?
All three all-day diagrams are being run, and according to RTT there were five out in this morning peak - 701037 being the missing one, although it could still appear on one of the evening diagrams. [EDIT- it didn't]

The morning Shepperton-via-Richmond diagram (2H90 etc) didn't happen: "problem with the train crew"
 
Last edited:

Cowley

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Global Moderator
Joined
15 Apr 2016
Messages
17,186
Location
Devon
No more DOO discussions in this thread please. I think we all know how that tends to work out and it’ll only end up pulling things off topic.

Thanks :)
 

SWT_USER

Member
Joined
29 Aug 2010
Messages
1,073
Location
Ashford Middx
Had a ride on one earlier, I was a bit surprised that the superior acceleration didn't lead to us making up any of the delay caused by the speed restriction at Richmond (when is that due to be fixed?).
 

Goldfish62

Veteran Member
Joined
14 Feb 2010
Messages
11,676
Had a ride on one earlier, I was a bit surprised that the superior acceleration didn't lead to us making up any of the delay caused by the speed restriction at Richmond (when is that due to be fixed?).
That severe restriction (walking pace) seems to be costing around a couple of minutes. It must be playing havoc in the AM Peak. There'd have to be a lot accelerating between there and Waterloo to make up any meaningful time!
 

swr444

Member
Joined
26 Aug 2008
Messages
660
Location
London
That severe restriction (walking pace) seems to be costing around a couple of minutes. It must be playing havoc in the AM Peak. There'd have to be a lot accelerating between there and Waterloo to make up any meaningful time!
It’s a 5mph emergency restriction due to something coming off the point work. Knowing network rail it’ll take a while to fix. There’s 3 AWS faults on the “new and reliable” BEF signalling system between reading and twickenham too which doesn’t help things.
 

Goldfish62

Veteran Member
Joined
14 Feb 2010
Messages
11,676
It’s a 5mph emergency restriction due to something coming off the point work. Knowing network rail it’ll take a while to fix. There’s 3 AWS faults on the “new and reliable” BEF signalling system between reading and twickenham too which doesn’t help things.
Ah yes, I'm assuming one of these is between Whitton and Twickenham? Looking on OpenTrainTimes there's a signal which appears to have become approach-controlled which needn't be. Trains slow right down before it clears.

In the down direction since the resignalling trains seem to lose time being brought to a halt before Staines even though there's nothing in front.
 

NSEWonderer

Established Member
Joined
5 Dec 2020
Messages
2,011
Location
London
Ah yes, I'm assuming one of these is between Whitton and Twickenham? Looking on OpenTrainTimes there's a signal which appears to have become approach-controlled which needn't be. Trains slow right down before it clears.

In the down direction since the resignalling trains seem to lose time being brought to a halt before Staines even though there's nothing in front.
Yeah that signal has been reported multiple times but nothing fixed as of the moment.
 

swr444

Member
Joined
26 Aug 2008
Messages
660
Location
London
Ah yes, I'm assuming one of these is between Whitton and Twickenham? Looking on OpenTrainTimes there's a signal which appears to have become approach-controlled which needn't be. Trains slow right down before it clears.

In the down direction since the resignalling trains seem to lose time being brought to a halt before Staines even though there's nothing in front.
that's one of them yes, another one is the platform signal at ascot towards sunningdale and the signal just after reading towards Earley, they're all approach controlled. there's also a fault on the home signal into shepperton.
 

Goldfish62

Veteran Member
Joined
14 Feb 2010
Messages
11,676
that's one of them yes, another one is the platform signal at ascot towards sunningdale and the signal just after reading towards Earley, they're all approach controlled. there's also a fault on the home signal into shepperton.
Thanks. Yes, I'd noticed the Reading one as well.
 

mansonlo49

Member
Joined
11 Dec 2023
Messages
175
Location
uk

Attachments

  • IMG_1526.png
    IMG_1526.png
    375.5 KB · Views: 32

3973EXL

Established Member
Joined
2 Feb 2017
Messages
2,732
0V74 5Q74 Caped

0V87 5Q87/Q88 Caped
VSTP 5Q74 Derby Lit

0Z90 5Q87 Caped
 
Last edited:

wickham

Member
Joined
3 Feb 2021
Messages
368
Location
Knaphill
5Q87 and 5Q88 (above) movements 09.01.25 would appear to be the same unit. I wonder why they are doing it like this - most odd !
 

norbitonflyer

Established Member
Joined
24 Mar 2020
Messages
3,823
Location
SW London
When’s the last time we’ve had all 6? Always seems like it’s only 4 or 3. Hopefully a sign of increased driver availability
5th and 18th December seem to have been the only previous dates six have been out, but on both occasions one of the morning Shepperton diagrams didn't happen.
 

mansonlo49

Member
Joined
11 Dec 2023
Messages
175
Location
uk


0V74 still haven't been activated yet
 

Top