• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Class 810 for East Midlands Railway Construction/Introduction Updates

yorkie

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Administrator
Joined
6 Jun 2005
Messages
67,878
Location
Yorkshire
Just a gentle reminder, this is a rolling stock updates thread regarding Class 810s for EMR.

To discuss anything else, please use (or create) a separate thread; anything that is speculative in nature belongs in Speculative Discussion, please.

Many thanks :)
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Bald Rick

Veteran Member
Joined
28 Sep 2010
Messages
29,221
4 platforms which can only take 2x 810s compared to other InterCity London terminals.

As said repeatedly - you can’t get any more ’Inter City’ trains up the MML. 4 platforms is enough for the 6tph is the limit. 240m platforms is also enough - there’s only 2 types of Intercity train longer than this; an 11 car Pendolino, and a 2x5 car 80x. The former has roughly the same capacity as 2 x 810s. The latter has slightly more.
 

CTS1990

Member
Joined
5 May 2019
Messages
76
Location
East Anglia & Sheffield
Moving this discussion forward...am I right in thinking EMR delayed their introduction into service until late this year? Presumably testing in electric mode needs several months at least...
 

Snow1964

Established Member
Joined
7 Oct 2019
Messages
6,260
Location
West Wiltshire
Moving this discussion forward...am I right in thinking EMR delayed their introduction into service until late this year? Presumably testing in electric mode needs several months at least...
Different people have said different things. Some have said electrically same as class 805 (which has been tested), others say it is different.

I would be very surprised if they tried to reinvent the wheel and decided to make 810s (which are being built virtually as follow ons to 805 and 807s fundamentally different). I am under impression the differences are in nose cones and interior fitment, not the propulsion system
 

Nym

Established Member
Joined
2 Mar 2007
Messages
9,174
Location
Somewhere, not in London
The size and shape of the internal racking is quite different between the 810 and other 80x series to get some extra space inside. Came to light when we were trying to fit things within the design.
 

WesternLancer

Established Member
Joined
12 Apr 2019
Messages
7,198
Moving this discussion forward...am I right in thinking EMR delayed their introduction into service until late this year? Presumably testing in electric mode needs several months at least...
I've kind of lost track of how far the wires will have got to by the time the 810s start - will it be Leicester?
 

gingertom

Established Member
Joined
19 Jun 2017
Messages
1,256
Location
Kilsyth
Different people have said different things. Some have said electrically same as class 805 (which has been tested), others say it is different.

I would be very surprised if they tried to reinvent the wheel and decided to make 810s (which are being built virtually as follow ons to 805 and 807s fundamentally different). I am under impression the differences are in nose cones and interior fitment, not the propulsion system
propulsion system is different. Uprated motors (and no doubt control gear) but fewer of them, 125mph design top speed.
 

zwk500

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Jan 2020
Messages
13,423
Location
Bristol
Four miles, you thought they could accomplish that.This country is a joke, and not even a funny one
Electrification needs to take into consideration the various proposals to make it easier to get freight from Nuneaton to Peterborough.
 

Nottingham59

Established Member
Joined
10 Dec 2019
Messages
1,656
Location
Nottingham
Four miles, you thought they could accomplish that.This country is a joke, and not even a funny one
They could, easily. But there are three reasons why I don't think they will do Leicester next:
  1. There are proposals to add tracks to make a three or four track railway between Syston and Wigston though Leicester. Until a decision made on the future layout, it makes sense to electrify other sections first.
  2. There are no services which currently terminate at Leicester, so after extending from South Wigston to Leicester, they will still need bimodes to use the wires, and will still have to changeover somewhere.
  3. Electrification is grossly expensive, and politicians have chosen to use cost per single track km as the metric to drive down costs. The industry would be insane to electrify through Leicester as the next project, with all its junctions and platforms, and overbridges at urban density. Much more likely they will choose the simple and rural four-track section from Syston North to East Midlands Parkway next, as easiest to deliver the lowest cost per stkm. They will ignore the fact that no electric traction uses the slow lines, so that that some of the investment will have no economic return at all for many years.

Personally, I would do the next MML section at Sheffield, to be compatible with converting a number of routes in Yorkshire to battery operation.
 

Aspen90

Member
Joined
24 Oct 2021
Messages
85
Location
Rugby
Four miles, you thought they could accomplish that.This country is a joke, and not even a funny one
The other reason being that Leicester is a problem due to the low bridge at the south end of the platforms. It’s too low for OLE so NR looked at dropping the trackbed but the sewer/water table was right underneath so that canned that. I heard they were looking at using a contact conductive sheet/strip or something like that on the bridge ceiling so the pan can contact without the need for wires to be suspended. I’ve heard that there will be a gap between Wigston and then the wires will restart at Syston when/if they ever wire past Leicester. Think the plan was to run 360’s from Leicester, but I doubt that will happen. Quite a gap and a pain having to pan down engine on, drive a few miles then pan up, engine off etc.
 

Nottingham59

Established Member
Joined
10 Dec 2019
Messages
1,656
Location
Nottingham
The other reason being that Leicester is a problem due to the low bridge at the south end of the platforms. It’s too low for OLE so NR looked at dropping the trackbed but the sewer/water table was right underneath so that canned that. I heard they were looking at using a contact conductive sheet/strip or something like that on the bridge ceiling so the pan can contact without the need for wires to be suspended. I’ve heard that there will be a gap between Wigston and then the wires will restart at Syston when/if they ever wire past Leicester. Think the plan was to run 360’s from Leicester, but I doubt that will happen. Quite a gap and a pain having to pan down engine on, drive a few miles then pan up, engine off etc.
My understanding was that the station bridge at Leicester gives enough clearance for an insulated coating to be used on the underside of the bridge, as was used on the Intersection Bridge in Cardiff.

Though the issue at Leicester will be the low height of the wires and therefore the pantograph horns just above the adjacent platform. How they will address that, I don't know.
 

Aspen90

Member
Joined
24 Oct 2021
Messages
85
Location
Rugby
My understanding was that the station bridge at Leicester gives enough clearance for an insulated coating to be used on the underside of the bridge, as was used on the Intersection Bridge in Cardiff.

Though the issue at Leicester will be the low height of the wires and therefore the pantograph horns just above the adjacent platform. How they will address that, I don't know.
That’s exactly what I’d heard - sorry I couldn’t remember what it was called!
 

Trainman40083

Member
Joined
29 Jan 2024
Messages
379
Location
Derby
The other reason being that Leicester is a problem due to the low bridge at the south end of the platforms. It’s too low for OLE so NR looked at dropping the trackbed but the sewer/water table was right underneath so that canned that. I heard they were looking at using a contact conductive sheet/strip or something like that on the bridge ceiling so the pan can contact without the need for wires to be suspended. I’ve heard that there will be a gap between Wigston and then the wires will restart at Syston when/if they ever wire past Leicester. Think the plan was to run 360’s from Leicester, but I doubt that will happen. Quite a gap and a pain having to pan down engine on, drive a few miles then pan up, engine off etc.
Once upon a time, Tyco used to do a plastic insulator for just that purpose.. Low demand meant they discontinued it. Great at Birmingham International when the pigeons say on the wires above a Pendo (flash, bang)
 

Jozhua

Established Member
Joined
6 Jan 2019
Messages
1,857
Friendly place in speculative for debates around the merits of the 810s!

Ideally we'd like to keep this to just updates and some discussion around bringing the trains into service, rather than about the merits of the trains once they are in service. Hopefully that makes sense!

 

YorksLad12

Established Member
Joined
5 Feb 2020
Messages
1,896
Location
Leeds
As said repeatedly - you can’t get any more ’Inter City’ trains up the MML. 4 platforms is enough for the 6tph is the limit. 240m platforms is also enough - there’s only 2 types of Intercity train longer than this; an 11 car Pendolino, and a 2x5 car 80x. The former has roughly the same capacity as 2 x 810s. The latter has slightly more.
And this, really, is the tragedy. For want of 20m to extend the platforms by, we have to wait for the 810s to go through a whole type acceptance instead of being an off-the-shelf 80x.

Good to see them finally getting some mileage under their wheels though.

Friendly place in speculative for debates around the merits of the 810s!

Ideally we'd like to keep this to just updates and some discussion around bringing the trains into service, rather than about the merits of the trains once they are in service. Hopefully that makes sense!

Agreed, and thanks.
 

Mikw

Member
Joined
20 Apr 2022
Messages
417
Location
Leicester
Of course you are correct about the importance of non cancellations / timekeeping - but people do notice the poor internal state. Plenty of people I know who are not otherwise overly interested in railways do comment on it. It's across the whole fleet of course, not just the inter city services.
Indeed, EMR has some tatty trains for sure, an old core fleet and some hand me downs. Contrast that with TPE, but EMR's reliability record is a lot better.
I choose EMR based on that, but it would be lovely when their new trains eventually enter service.

I think the consensus was that the 180s were so utterly appalling in reliability terms that it was better all round to be rid of them.

One particular conversation with a signaller springs to mind, heading south into Leicester in a 222, and being replatformed due to yet another 180 failure: “we’re placing bets in the box on where the next one will sit down”.

They really were utterly shocking.
For my day trips to London i got into the habit or deliberately booking trips carried out by 180's. For two reasons, they were nice to ride on and - with the woeful reliability - i could claim delay/replay and get a really cheap trip to London1
 
Last edited:

Bald Rick

Veteran Member
Joined
28 Sep 2010
Messages
29,221
And this, really, is the tragedy. For want of 20m to extend the platforms by, we have to wait for the 810s to go through a whole type acceptance instead of being an off-the-shelf 80x.

I think yiur defintion of a tragedy is rather different to mine.
 

Trainbike46

Established Member
Joined
18 Sep 2021
Messages
2,310
Location
belfast
The suggestion upthread is the first ones at the end of this year or the beginning of next year, and the full fleet by the end of 2025. None of that is official though
 

dosxuk

Established Member
Joined
2 Jan 2011
Messages
1,766
And this, really, is the tragedy. For want of 20m to extend the platforms by, we have to wait for the 810s to go through a whole type acceptance instead of being an off-the-shelf 80x.
An alternative view could be that the 80x's should have been designed taking into account the wider network - which had standardised on 10x23m carriages or 12x20m carriages (hence St Pancras getting 240m platforms) - rather than just the initial routes they were purchased for.
 

Aspen90

Member
Joined
24 Oct 2021
Messages
85
Location
Rugby
Guys does anyone know the introduction dates of these trains?
First one on the network for testing - April, for first in service, ‘2025’, for all in service end of 2025. Test unit may be based at Kettering in the engineering siding, could change though. This could all move of course!
 

800001

Established Member
Joined
24 Oct 2015
Messages
3,588
The latest edition of ‘Todays Railways’ has an interview with EMR Fleet Director.
He states:-

T1 - Old Dalby testing
T2 - Two cars sent to Pistoia, Italy for climate chamber testing.
T3, T4, T5 complete at Aycliffe and in test.
T6-T11 in assembly
T13 - in paint
T16 - at weld stage
No mention of T12.

First production units expected to be delivered in Quarter 2 of 2024 with final delivery Q2 of 2025.

Service introduction early 2025 with all in service December 2025.
 

Top