• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Cricket

stantheman

On Moderation
Joined
17 Nov 2017
Messages
341
The exciting England of a few years ago are a finished busted flush sadly . Root is patently not for this format . Malian is too slow . Bairstiow Buttler and Stokes are near the end of their careers . Nobody frightens the opposition any more .
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Harvester

Established Member
Joined
9 Nov 2020
Messages
1,341
Location
Notts
England have won the toss and are going to bat first in the crunch match against Sri Lanka. Brook, Atkinson and the injured Topley are out, with Livingstone, Moeen Ali and Woakes returning.
 

GS250

Member
Joined
18 Mar 2019
Messages
1,025
This is an abject surrender as I can remember.

Agreed the fear factor of this team has been utterly obliterated. The big guns are starting to wane and we need to start planning for the future.

Out of every major sporting tournament that I follow...this WC appears to have just silently crept up on us.
 

SteveM70

Established Member
Joined
11 Jul 2018
Messages
4,026
Just awful. I don't think a single wicket was lost to an unplayable ball, just rank bad batting for 8 of them, bad running in Root's case and utter stupidity and lack of awareness from Rashid.

Still, you never know what the wicket is truly like until both teams have batted, as Lord Boycott of Fitzwilliam would say
 

Busaholic

Veteran Member
Joined
7 Jun 2014
Messages
14,241
Just awful. I don't think a single wicket was lost to an unplayable ball, just rank bad batting for 8 of them, bad running in Root's case and utter stupidity and lack of awareness from Rashid.

Still, you never know what the wicket is truly like until both teams have batted, as Lord Boycott of Fitzwilliam would say
Malan got a good ball from Angelo Mathews (nice to see him back in their side) and, to be fair, Root had to get back to his crease because Bairstow turned down the run.

This is the first ODI England have ever played where all the XI are over 30, most by several years.

England brought Woakes back because he's done such a good job so far :rolleyes:, rewarded Atkinson for his spirited batting performance in the last game by omitting him, likewise Brook, and kept Wood at no.11 as Willey and Rashid are obviously the better batters.:rolleyes::rolleyes: Oh, and they won the toss again.

Brydon Carse may as well fly back to England on the next flight.
 

DelW

Established Member
Joined
15 Jan 2015
Messages
3,988
Just awful. I don't think a single wicket was lost to an unplayable ball, just rank bad batting for 8 of them, bad running in Root's case and utter stupidity and lack of awareness from Rashid.

Still, you never know what the wicket is truly like until both teams have batted, as Lord Boycott of Fitzwilliam would say
Well, we know the answer to that one now :( - Sri Lanka could probably have chased twice our score.
 

Harvester

Established Member
Joined
9 Nov 2020
Messages
1,341
Location
Notts
Just awful. I don't think a single wicket was lost to an unplayable ball, just rank bad batting for 8 of them, bad running in Root's case and utter stupidity and lack of awareness from Rashid.
Rashid’s dismissal was bizarre! He was caught day dreaming; it just ‘sums it all up’ for England.
 

JD2168

Member
Joined
11 Jul 2022
Messages
1,043
Location
Sheffield
A dreadful performance from England who were rightly beaten by Sri Lanka. Poor batting & decision making, Ben Stokes plugged away but it was slow going.

England need to play more 50 over one-day Cricket both at International & County level & less of the Hundred & Twenty20 style cricket.
 

SteveM70

Established Member
Joined
11 Jul 2018
Messages
4,026
A dreadful performance from England who were rightly beaten by Sri Lanka. Poor batting & decision making, Ben Stokes plugged away but it was slow going.

England need to play more 50 over one-day Cricket both at International & County level & less of the Hundred & Twenty20 style cricket.

There is plenty of county-level 50 over cricket. The problem is the ECB decided in their infinite wisdom that it would be a great idea to invent an entirely unnecessary additional format, magic up 8 franchises coincidentally based at test grounds, pay players fortunes for it, and schedule it bang on top of the 50 over competition.
 

Howardh

Established Member
Joined
17 May 2011
Messages
8,338
I’m sure Sir Geoffrey Boycott would have something to say about that :D
He played 65 over Gillette cricket back in the day, wonder what his top score was? Later on 65 overs became 60, with 55 overs cup as well, and the 40 overs Sunday league. 60 overs was my fave format but struggled with light late on.
 

Peterthegreat

Established Member
Joined
22 Feb 2021
Messages
1,363
Location
South Yorkshire
He played 65 over Gillette cricket back in the day, wonder what his top score was? Later on 65 overs became 60, with 55 overs cup as well, and the 40 overs Sunday league. 60 overs was my fave format but struggled with light late on.
He scored 146 in the 1965 Gillette cup final - 15 fours and 3 sixes.
 

Busaholic

Veteran Member
Joined
7 Jun 2014
Messages
14,241
At last some competitive games in the World Cup!

Pakistan v South Africa was a pretty good one, but today's Australia v New Zealand beat it imo. I thought that if Travis Head could recover from his injury in time his presence would make a huge difference, and so it proved, to add to David Warner's prolonged swansong. Glenn Maxwell and Adam Zampa are class acts as well, what a shame we currently have nobody to match them. New Zealand have surprised some (but not me) by doing so well, even without their captain Kane Williamson for most of the time. Rachin Ravindra has blossomed, aided by his experiences in England, and the unpredictable Jimmy Neesham almost won the game for them.

Now for tomorrow's one-sided game...
 

DelW

Established Member
Joined
15 Jan 2015
Messages
3,988
Channel 5 is making it clear what it thinks of England's performance so far. The highlights of today's England vs India match were supposed to be shown at 7pm according to my TV magazine. The EPG now shows that as having been replaced by "30 ways to reduce your Christmas spend", with the cricket highlights moved to 01:10 tomorrow.

Ironically it looks as though today might be their first decent performance (though even as I typed that, Malan and Root's wickets have just been taken :()
 

Harvester

Established Member
Joined
9 Nov 2020
Messages
1,341
Location
Notts
Ironically it looks as though today might be their first decent performance (though even as I typed that, Malan and Root's wickets have just been taken :()
Decent performance by the bowlers, but the batting is woeful. 81/6 last time I checked, chasing a mere 230.
 

DelW

Established Member
Joined
15 Jan 2015
Messages
3,988
Decent performance by the bowlers, but the batting is woeful. 81/6 last time I checked, chasing a mere 230.
Yes, I was tempting fate a bit there. I don't think I'll be staying up to 01:10 to watch this dross!
 

Busaholic

Veteran Member
Joined
7 Jun 2014
Messages
14,241
Just come back from Sunday lunch, TV on asleep in 10 minutes? - 95-6
None of England's top six reached twenty runs, for the second time in three matches, and for only the second time in World Cup history too, Talk about plumbing the depths, and makes a mockery of that exceptionally ill-timed decision re central contracts for players going forward. At least four of this team will never play a 50 over game again I predict after this series, and at least five will never play another one in England colours.
 

ian1944

Member
Joined
13 Dec 2012
Messages
514
Location
North Berwick
Nice quote from somewhere - they folded faster than the contestants in a speed-origami competition. I take it that it's no longer "mathematically possible" for England to proceed. Even the Australians must be feeling pity.
 

Top