NZ somehow contrived to lose their 20/20 match with Pakistan - take a look at the scorecard and you may see what I mean. Swap the sides over and there would be immediate suspicions!
Regarding Ben Stokes, it may be instructive to compare his test stats at the end of the last (second) test to those of Ian Botham at the same stage of his career. So, after 21 tests each, both at the age of 24:-
Botham runs 1035, ave 38.33, 4 centuries, highest score 137
Stokes runs 1282, ave 33.73, 3 centuries, highest score 258
Botham wickets 107, ave 19.60, 5-wicket innings 10 times, best bowling 8-34
Stokes wickets 47, ave 41.93, 5-wicket innings 2 times, best bowling 6-36
There's no doubt then that Botham was a much better bowler at that early stage in his career, but Botham, not a man given to false modesty, considers Stokes to at least be his equal in the batting stakes. Flintoff, who doesn't like getting drawn into these sorts of comparisons, has apparently said that Stokes is a better batsman than him, with more natural talent.
Scyld Berry, the veteran cricket correspondent, had also in his newspaper column compared Stokes to Garry Sobers. So what, you may ask, but the column in question was written and published after only the first day's play in the Cape Town test, with Stokes 74 not out. Extremely prescient!