• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Crossrail opening delayed (opening date not yet known)

Status
Not open for further replies.

moggie

Member
Joined
2 Jan 2010
Messages
426
Location
West Midlands
The Costain Skanska JV responsible for Bond Street have **recently** been removed from the contract for continued non delivery and not engaging on post Covid replanning. everyThe time taken t complee
Bond Street was the first station contract let and the widely held view is that they under bid and did not fully understand the M+E and systems integration requirements.


Separately HS2 is being taken to court for awarding CS et al. a station contract partly based on its successful delivery of Bond Street. HS2 are claiming that they knew nothing about Bond Street problems which have been in the trade press for the last 5 years. The autopsies suggest the Bond Street issues began to be noticeable in summer 2013.
Thanks for this. But confirms in part at least what I suspected. Further programme slippage on key elements caused by 'events' unconnected with C19 though no doubt being compounded by such in attempts to mitigate time lost. Presumably the implication being that Bond St station woes are causing knock on impact to the integrated programme downstream dependable's?
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Taunton

Established Member
Joined
1 Aug 2013
Messages
10,154
Assuming that was probably December 2021 and coincides with a timetable, any lost time will be shoved forward to the next timetable, probably May. Because otherwise its impractical especially with the implications for Paddington & Liverpool St
How can that be? A core service from Abbey Wood to Paddington doesn't impact any existing service at all.

Regarding any station changes other than physical platform length, those can surely be done when any money shortfall is obtained. The entire project doesn't need to wait for a bit of non-operational building work at the side of a 175 year old existing railway.

The Paddington LL Crossrail to Bakerloo pedestrian tunnel was value engineered out then added back in later while mostly complete the work to opening up at the Bakerloo station / platforms end had only just started pre Covid lock down and the Bakerloo connectivity is impared currently so until that is all finished no CR opening
Well Abbey Wood to Paddington is not going to have a huge transfer to the Bakerloo. In fact it might even help with reduced passenger flows there.
 
Last edited:

Horizon22

Established Member
Associate Staff
Jobs & Careers
Joined
8 Sep 2019
Messages
7,672
Location
London
How can that be? A core service from Abbey Wood to Paddington doesn't impact any existing service at all.

Regarding any station changes other than physical platform length, those can surely be done when any money shortfall is obtained. The entire project doesn't need to wait for a bit of non-operational building work at the side of a 175 year old existing railway.


Well Abbey Wood to Paddington is not going to have a huge transfer to the Bakerloo. In fact it might even help with reduced passenger flows there.

I was referring to the full service on all lines.
 

ForTheLoveOf

Established Member
Joined
7 Oct 2017
Messages
6,416
If the signalling is a problem? Can't they just rig up a conventional colour light system in the tunnels?
If they'd realised it was a showstopping problem a few years earlier that's possibly what might have happened - it's what they did on the Jubilee Line Extension for quite a number of years after it opened.

However, it would have involved spending a lot of extra time and money designing, installing and testing that conventional (and thus non standards compliant) signalling. Time and money that could have been spent working on the long term signalling system. And then you have to spend time and money again (with the line shut, thus causing disruption and loss of revenue) to install the real deal.

The signalling system probably isn't even the biggest showstopper at this point: the physical construction work and validation thereof probably is.
 

JonathanH

Veteran Member
Joined
29 May 2011
Messages
18,993
Latest update now says it will be the first half of 2022 before the central Section opens.


UPDATE FOLLOWING CROSSRAIL BOARD – AUGUST 2020
Friday 21st August 2020
By Crossrail Ltd press office

* Everyone on Crossrail and across the supply chain is working tirelessly to deliver the Elizabeth line for London as soon as possible
* Delivery of the Elizabeth line is now in its complex final stages with a comprehensive plan to complete the railway focused on completing the remaining construction and systems integration followed by intensive operational testing
* From the start of intensive testing it will then take a period of time to fully test the Elizabeth line before it can open for passenger service

The Crossrail Ltd Board yesterday met and considered the latest update from the leadership team concerning progress to complete the Elizabeth line. This follows an update after the July Board where it was announced that the central section could not open in summer 2021.

Delivery of the Elizabeth line is now in its complex final stages and is being completed at a time of great uncertainty due to the risks and potential impacts of further Covid outbreaks.

The Board’s latest assessment, based on the best available programme information right now, is that the central section between Paddington and Abbey Wood will be ready to open in the first half of 2022. As work to complete the railway progresses, there may be opportunity to review and bring forward the opening of the central section, subject to progress during the intensive operational testing phase.

The latest cost estimate presented to the Board shows that the cost to complete the Crossrail project could be up to £1.1bn above the Financing Package agreed in December 2018 (£450m more than the upper end of the range announced in November 2019). Work is ongoing to finalise the cost estimates.

Crossrail is planning to start intensive operational testing, known as Trial Running, at the earliest opportunity in 2021. From the start of Trial Running it will then take a period of time to fully test the Elizabeth line before it can open for passenger service. This includes a final phase known as Trial Operations involving people being invited onto trains and stations to test real-time service scenarios to ensure the readiness of the railway.

Following the opening of the central section, full services across the Elizabeth line from Reading and Heathrow in the west to Abbey Wood and Shenfield in the east will be introduced. The introduction of full services will be aligned with the National Rail timetable change which occurs twice a year in May and December.

Crossrail and Sponsors are currently reviewing Crossrail's governance arrangements to make sure the right decisions are taken as the project moves towards completion, and that it successfully transitions to TfL as soon as possible.

A programme of this scale and complexity was already challenging, with pressures on the schedule before COVID-19 became a factor; the impact of COVID-19 has made the existing pressures more acute. The schedule delay is due to three main factors:

Routeway: we have had lower than planned productivity in the final completion and handover of the shafts and portals. The shafts and portals form a critical part of the routeway and contain many of the complex operating systems for the Elizabeth line. We have now completed handover of eight of the ten shafts and portals to TfL and will complete handover of the final two this autumn.

Stations: as more detailed plans for the completion and handover of the ten central section stations have developed, we have revised our previous schedule assumptions about the pace at which these large and complex stations can be handed over to TfL. The completion and handover of all the stations in the central section is a monumental task - in our updated plan we have phased the transfer of stations to take account the scale of this undertaking.

COVID-19: Covid has further exacerbated the schedule pressures due to a pause of physical activity on sites during lockdown to keep the workforce safe and significant constraints on ongoing work and productivity due to the reduced numbers that can work on site to meet strict social distancing requirements. We now have a maximum of around 2,000 people on our sites, less than 50 per cent of our pre-Covid complement.
Despite the challenges presented by COVID-19, good progress continues to be made with completing the remaining construction works, with much of this work coming to an end along with software testing for the signalling and train systems. Progress during the last six months includes all central section stations, except Bond Street, now certified as ready to support Trial Running; eight of ten shafts and portals completed and handed over to the operator; handover of the first central section station, Custom House, to TfL; the introduction of the first full-length Class 345 train in passenger service between Paddington and Heathrow and a viable signalling software product available for Trial Running.

To help recover some of the lost time, Crossrail is undertaking a period of intensive construction activity during August and September to complete the remaining construction works in the routeway for Trial Running. The construction blockade is progressing well and achieving targeted levels of productivity. Following completion of the blockade in September, Crossrail will commence testing of the next evolution of the signalling software, helping to further build operational reliability. Once software testing completes later this year, Crossrail will then begin an enabling phase for Trial Running with testing in the tunnels undertaken with an increased number of trains. This will provide an opportunity to test how well the railway systems work in operational-like situations and will be undertaken as the extensive safety case to the Office of Rail and Road to commence Trial Running is finalised.

Mark Wild, Chief Executive, Crossrail Ltd, said: “Our focus remains on opening the Elizabeth line as soon as possible. Now more than ever Londoners are relying on the capacity and connectivity that the Elizabeth line will bring, and we are doing everything possible to deliver the railway as safely and quickly as we can. We have a comprehensive plan to complete the railway and we are striving to commence intensive operational testing for the Elizabeth line, known as Trial Running, at the earliest opportunity. Delivery of the Elizabeth line is now in its complex final stages and is being completed at a time of great uncertainty due to the risk and potential impacts of further Covid outbreaks. We are working tirelessly to complete the remaining infrastructure works so that we can fully test the railway and successfully transition the project as an operational railway to Transport for London.”

Crossrail is one of the UK’s most complex infrastructure projects, comprised of millions of separate elements, all of which must work together reliably to ensure the successful operation of the railway and the safety of passengers who will use it every day. Much of the remaining work involves hooking up, integrating, testing and certifying the completed infrastructure and railway systems along with the finalisation of the extensive safety case to the Office of Rail and Road who will give the go-ahead to commence Trial Running.

Ends

For media enquiries – Peter MacLennan, 07841 230976 / Andy Day, 07710 852966



Information for Journalist:

Trial Running marks a key point in the project’s transition to an operational railway and is a critical step forward in making possible the opening of passenger services between Paddington and Abbey Wood. Trial Running will see multiple trains operating in the tunnels to fully test the timetable and build reliability while the final works to the stations are completed. This includes a final phase known as Trial Operations to test real-time service scenarios to ensure the readiness of the railway.

When the central section of the Elizabeth line opens the railway will operate as follows:

Paddington (Elizabeth line station) to Abbey Wood via central London
Liverpool Street (mainline station) to Shenfield
Paddington (mainline station) to Heathrow and Reading
Following the central section opening, full services across the Elizabeth line from Reading and Heathrow in the west to Abbey Wood and Shenfield in the east, will be introduced. The introduction of full services will be aligned with National Rail timetable changes in May and December each year.

======

THIS ANNOUNCEMENT CONTAINS INSIDE INFORMATION FOR THE PURPOSES OF ARTICLE 7 OF THE MARKET ABUSE REGULATION (EU) 596/2014.

Transport for London (TfL)

21 August 2020

Crossrail opening timetable and cost forecast update

On 23 July 2020 Transport for London ("TfL") announced that following the Crossrail Limited (“CRL”) Board meeting held earlier that day, CRL had advised that the opening of the central section of the Elizabeth line would not occur during summer 2021 and that the cost to complete the Crossrail project was expected to be higher than previously announced on 8 November 2019.

CRL has continued to work on a plan to drive the Crossrail project to completion and, although some details are still to be finalised, has provided an initial proposal to its sponsors (TfL and the Department for Transport (“DfT”)) that indicates the central section of the Elizabeth line opening during the first half of 2022. CRL’s proposal is not a confirmed opening window and remains subject to review and validation by TfL and DfT as sponsors of the Crossrail project.

The current £2.15bn financing package for the Crossrail project was agreed between the DfT, the Greater London Authority and TfL in December 2018 (the "Financing Package"). CRL has continued to assess the potential range of costs associated with the proposed opening window and the CRL Board has advised that, based on its latest proposal, the cost to complete the Crossrail project is currently expected to be up to £1.1bn above the Financing Package. CRL will continue to review the cost schedule and update its sponsors as appropriate.

TfL and DfT are in discussion regarding how funding of the additional costs will be resolved, while the Financing Package remains in place. The delay in the opening of the Elizabeth line will have a negative impact on TfL’s revenues. These are as yet unquantified but will be considered as part of TfL’s wider financial planning activities.

TfL also remains in constructive discussions with Government about how the impact of the COVID-19 virus on TfL's finances will be managed.

For further information, please contact:

Transport for London
5 Endeavour Square
London E20 1JN
Email: [email protected]
 

Taunton

Established Member
Joined
1 Aug 2013
Messages
10,154
It seems impossible now to get opening down below two years forward from the announcement date. Actual progress appears to be zero. Presumably the "intensive testing" that is being blamed this time was nevertheless in the original project plan.
 

JonathanH

Veteran Member
Joined
29 May 2011
Messages
18,993
It seems impossible now to get opening down below two years forward from the announcement date. Actual progress appears to be zero. Presumably the "intensive testing" that is being blamed this time was nevertheless in the original project plan.
Isn't the problem that they thought the "intensive testing" could be done in the tunnels whilst the stations were still being built and they subsequently realised that because the materials were being delivered by rail it was impossible to clear the line for testing? It does seem like the "intensive testing" basically needs the project to be otherwise complete now.
 

ijmad

Established Member
Joined
7 Jan 2016
Messages
1,812
Location
UK
They were doing the engineering blockade this month and next to finish off all work in/near the tunnels that could possibly interfere with trial running

Did they find more snags (or serious problems) than anticipated? Interested to delve in to the details.
 

Taunton

Established Member
Joined
1 Aug 2013
Messages
10,154
And another demand for another half billion of funding to pay for it. What a gravy train for the contractors. And however can Khan put himself up for mayor again after presiding over this.

Andy Byford has always been a decent practical guy, and really should tell it like it is on what really are the causes of this. Not just this one but all the cumulative issues.

Mark Wild needs to go, not with some lucrative "settlement" but dismissed for incompetence. In any real world business something like this again would see him, and his acolytes, gone in a flash.
 
Last edited:

jfollows

Established Member
Joined
26 Feb 2011
Messages
5,967
Location
Wilmslow
And another demand for another half billion of funding to pay for it. What a gravy train for the contractors.
True, but many of them aren't to blame, it's the woefully bad project management that's primarily to blame here, some of which of course came from contractors, but mainly not supervised and managed properly by TfL
 
Last edited:

JonathanH

Veteran Member
Joined
29 May 2011
Messages
18,993
And another demand for another half billion of funding to pay for it. What a gravy train for the contractors. And however can Khan put himself up for mayor again after presiding over this.
How is it a gravy train? The thing has to be built and the construction workers have to be paid or they won't build it. A few more months of employment for those people, granted, but I doubt they have been dragging their work out looking for the project to continue longer than it needs to.
 

Taunton

Established Member
Joined
1 Aug 2013
Messages
10,154
How is it a gravy train? The thing has to be built and the construction workers have to be paid or they won't build it. A few more months of employment for those people, granted, but I doubt they have been dragging their work out looking for the project to continue longer than it needs to.
Well the contractors will expect to make their normal 10% margin on all they are asked to do, in fact you normally make a better margin on the variations than on the original quoted work. And it's not a few months, this has been going on for years. All the work required should have been in the original contract sum - there hasn't been any expansion of the project scope.
 

JonathanH

Veteran Member
Joined
29 May 2011
Messages
18,993
I think the point has to be drawn out that the 'first half of 2022' date now announced has nothing to do with Shenfield, Reading or Heathrow - it is presented as a new date for the central part of the route (Paddington to Abbey Wood) to start operations without through running. The through running is indicated to start from a subsequent timetable change - so potentially December 2022 or May 2023.
 

CaptainBen

Member
Joined
3 Feb 2020
Messages
35
Location
London
Well the contractors will expect to make their normal 10% margin on all they are asked to do, in fact you normally make a better margin on the variations than on the original quoted work. And it's not a few months, this has been going on for years. All the work required should have been in the original contract sum - there hasn't been any expansion of the project scope.
10%!? For a civil engineering contractor? You're joking. Most of the T1 contractors (i.e. the ones that take on a Crossrail-sized job) regard 1.5% margin as a really good result. And they'll never get that on a job that overruns by four years.
 

Grumpy Git

On Moderation
Joined
13 Oct 2019
Messages
2,140
Location
Liverpool
Omnishambles??

Clusterf*ck is a better word.

10%!? For a civil engineering contractor? You're joking. Most of the T1 contractors (i.e. the ones that take on a Crossrail-sized job) regard 1.5% margin as a really good result. And they'll never get that on a job that overruns by four years.

You have to remember that there will have been some serious "bonuses" and remunerations paid out of the amount before any profit, although they should be made to pay them back given the state of this project.
 

Taunton

Established Member
Joined
1 Aug 2013
Messages
10,154
10%!? For a civil engineering contractor? You're joking. Most of the T1 contractors (i.e. the ones that take on a Crossrail-sized job) regard 1.5% margin as a really good result. And they'll never get that on a job that overruns by four years.
I'm well aware of the numbers, there are numbers for public consumption and real numbers known to the board. Let's start with retrospective group discounts from materials suppliers, shall we, never seen in the contract accounts. Etc etc. Why ever do you think that so many major contractors now have significant foreign investor ownership.
 

Nicholas Lewis

Established Member
Joined
9 Aug 2019
Messages
6,184
Location
Surrey
And another demand for another half billion of funding to pay for it. What a gravy train for the contractors. And however can Khan put himself up for mayor again after presiding over this.

Andy Byford has always been a decent practical guy, and really should tell it like it is on what really are the causes of this. Not just this one but all the cumulative issues.

Mark Wild needs to go, not with some lucrative "settlement" but dismissed for incompetence. In any real world business something like this again would see him, and his acolytes, gone in a flash.
This fiasco rest firmly with the original Crossrail Board of Andy Wolstenholme and Terry Morgan who not only were paid handsomely but received bonus for failure. Spineless Mayor of London should have withheld the bonus and so what if it ended up in court. Additionally Jacobs who were supposed to provided project oversight to Tfl was inadequate despite fees of £30m but they were ultimately ignored by TfL and the Mayor of London. This is the real problem here the politicians wanted the glory and no accountability now there shown to be a key part of the issue the pendulum has swung the other way and they are being ultra cautious.

Yes Covid has cost 2-3months of lost production at the coal face but running the trains and software development wouldn't be constrained like physical work at station yet the trial running and testing phase has been elongated yet again. Something feels significantly awry here yet there is little of the transparency that Wilde promised us when he took over to explain things and TfL continue to sit on the fence.

I wouldn't be surprised that with Dept of Transport meddling in TfL affairs they would be quite happy to let DofT pick up the pieces now. Mind you they have there own financial challenges of a blank cheque book to bail out existing transport operators to cover off as well.

Not a happy place and any thought of CR2 is way off the agenda now.
 

InOban

Established Member
Joined
12 Mar 2017
Messages
4,227
Getting back to CR1, I thought that the contractors at Bond St had been fired?
And having a two month blockade to complete civil work and then moving to trial running (instead of trying to do both at once) seems sensible.
 

quantinghome

Established Member
Joined
1 Jun 2013
Messages
2,265
This fiasco rest firmly with the original Crossrail Board of Andy Wolstenholme and Terry Morgan who not only were paid handsomely but received bonus for failure. Spineless Mayor of London should have withheld the bonus and so what if it ended up in court.
So what if it ended up in court? Well, in all probability the Mayor would have ended up having to pay the bonuses anyway AND court fees on top. This is why large organisations have lawyers to advise them, as opposed to grandstanding members of online forums.
 

ijmad

Established Member
Joined
7 Jan 2016
Messages
1,812
Location
UK
Did I read somewhere there was a theoretical threat of Crossrail being taken off TfL entirely if it needed more funding?
 

Tio Terry

Member
Joined
2 May 2014
Messages
1,178
Location
Spain
Did I read somewhere there was a theoretical threat of Crossrail being taken off TfL entirely if it needed more funding?

Bearing in mind that a considerable amount of the funding has been paid for by the inhabitants of London via various taxes and Council Tax precept I serious doubt that any government would think that was a politically sensible course of action. Also, that would move responsibility for finance away from the London Mayor and TfL, another political mistake for a national government.
 

Taunton

Established Member
Joined
1 Aug 2013
Messages
10,154
This fiasco rest firmly with the original Crossrail Board of Andy Wolstenholme and Terry Morgan who not only were paid handsomely but received bonus for failure. Spineless Mayor of London should have withheld the bonus and so what if it ended up in court.
I quite agree that the top paid perpetrators of the fiction of progress (plus a well-known consultancy who scooped millions for doing blow all) should have ended up in court - for a different reason of course. It's a bit difficult when both the Met Police Fraud Squad and TfL report up to the Mayor.
 

BrianW

Established Member
Joined
22 Mar 2017
Messages
1,511
Getting back to CR1 Omnishambles too ...
Just like GW electrification, so much optimism bias aka dissembling?
I've given up listening to so-called updates while hoping the trains will not be unuseable rusted hulks by whenever they are called for.
 

NortholtPark

Member
Joined
27 Aug 2017
Messages
20
Inconvenience is one thing, partly started or unfinished station fronts are an eyesore.

They can make an area look quite down at heal and ugly...bit like very sloppy home DIY.

Amateurs the lot of 'em!!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top