@8J's useful post contains two words that possibly get to the heart of the issue: "security contractors". I have no doubt these people were "following orders" and were not going to vary from them in any way for anyone. Now for one-off events like this I can understand NWR bringing in outside assistance but clearly the quality of on the day supervision of said personnel was wholly inadequate.
Should heads roll? Absolutely they should! Northern's station team leader on duty that night was trying to communicate with NR and security staff on duty that trains were leaving half empty and requested that more passengers were let through. He was told in no uncertain terms to go away and not interfere with their operation.
There should be an inquiry in to events that unfolded on Monday 26/05/2025 with findings published.
Thank you for sharing. TPEx had reduced their Liverpool to Leeds service to just one an hour because (I presume) the diversion route through Wakefield Kirkgate could not take the the full TPEx 4 trains per hour that would normally travel via Dewsbury. I hope they realise that it was a mistake not to run a second hourly train from Liverpool to Manchester Victoria and perhaps onto Huddersfield from the get-go.The first thing to note was that reduced timetables were in operation due to engineering blockades at a number of locations.
Not merely considering but proving that adequate measures are in place (transport, sanitation etc) to cope with the numbers expected.Not at all. The authorities absolutely should be considering the ability of the area's infrastructure to cope with the demands placed on it by any and all large events.
That’s not the fault of the operators. The more i hear, the more it looks like both Liverpool FC and the council grossly underestimated numbers for the parade and the station and previous processes/staffing levels couldn’t cope with the volume of people all at once.
Yes. Network Rail is often hilariously disconnected from the end-customer.Could it be that Network Rail's structural immunity from complaints from passengers, even when they are fully responsible for a failure, is a contributory factor within their poor performance?
With personnel like these, you generally need to have them closely supervised by railway staff; otherwise, everything goes wrong.@8J's useful post contains two words that possibly get to the heart of the issue: "security contractors". I have no doubt these people were "following orders" and were not going to vary from them in any way for anyone. Now for one-off events like this I can understand NWR bringing in outside assistance but clearly the quality of on the day supervision of said personnel was wholly inadequate.
Literally nobody said that.Liverpool FC are at fault for winning the title. Got it.
As well as the entrance from Lime Street station there are two more I thinkI’m assuming the North Western, Wetherspoons pub in Lime Street station, was closed for all or most of Monday? Or is there a second entrance somewhere off the street?
As well as the entrance from Lime Street station there are two more I think
It was open, they blocked people leaving into the station later in the afternoon.I’m assuming the North Western, Wetherspoons pub in Lime Street station, was closed for all or most of Monday? Or is there a second entrance somewhere off the street?
Wembley stadium is exactly the same for both stations,The plan should come with clear measures to communicate to passengers what is happening. The whole fact that this is a tried and tested plan means there has been plenty of time to sort this out. Other posters have made it obvious this communication didn't happen, and some people even received false information. This isn't acceptable. It's especially unacceptable for people to think they're stranded in the city when someone might be going around trying to kill people.
I believe Northern, TransPennine Express and Avanti West Coast had extra trains showing a couple of weeks in advance. It's just that most of those were unadvertised. Control were able to get more out of course.Northern, TPE and LNWR also operated some late notice extra services to/from Lime St.
Yes - these were in addition to the planned unadvertised services. Avanti managed to run 7 additional services that were only organised on the day, TPE managed 4, Northern managed 12 and LNWR managed 10 which I think is pretty impressive in the circumstances.I believe Northern, TransPennine Express and Avanti West Coast had extra trains showing a couple of weeks in advance. It's just that most of those were unadvertised. Control were able to get more out of course.
Multiple members of staff attempted to have a conversation with the BTP that night in an attempt to get more people out of the crowd and into the queuing system as we were extremely concerned about the capacity still available on the trains but were told that they couldn’t facilitate the request.
This was apparently because the queue had broken down by that point so badly that it was not possible to know who was going where any more and allowing some in could cause the police to become overwhelmed and unable to stop the flow of people into the station at all.
Most TOCs had accepted that trains were going to go out late and some of the TOCs had staff on the ground of a senior enough level to authorise delayed departures of services in order to give the best chance of trains being filled.
Unfortunately the shambolic queuing system led to horrific scenes involving customers with physical and mental disabilities being left outside in the rain so when they eventually came into the station they were in often extreme distress.
Many people knew that it was unlikely that the system in place would work. When I arrived the queues were already building, with vast amounts of people in different queues than had been agreed before hand.
The limited amount of Network Rail security staff on the ground very quickly lost control of the situation and were not equipped to deal with the volume of passengers that night. Eventually the BTP had to take complete control of it, NR then declared a major incident and BTP brought in civil police as they were also being overwhelmed by the number of people.
It's also worth knowing that there were times that whist outside may have been chaotic the formal queuing system was actually empty.
Yes. Network Rail is often hilariously disconnected from the end-customer.
With personnel like these, you generally need to have them closely supervised by railway staff; otherwise, everything goes wrong.
From what I have seen Network Rail have chronic issues with interacting with every type of customer, from TOC to passenger in everything they do, and can be hostile/bureaucratic in the process for the sake of it. Dare I say it is an us vs them mentality, perhaps inherited from the Railtrack days.I’ve always had that feeling of Network Rail’s station staff indeed being very disconnected from the end-user. At times some of their staff seem to walk around with almost disdain and suspicion for anyone actually trying to use the stations. Whether this is a recruitment or management issue I’ve no idea.
Yes, good effort there.Yes - these were in addition to the planned unadvertised services. Avanti managed to run 7 additional services that were only organised on the day, TPE managed 4, Northern managed 12 and LNWR managed 10 which I think is pretty impressive in the circumstances.
Top credit has to go to Avanti for their efforts to run extra trains considering the complexities and distance that some of these additional services covered.
I can corroborate this version of events.Another anonymous member of staff who was there on the day has asked me to post the following:
I have seen a video shared by the staff member which clearly shows that the queuing system is completely empty of passengers whilst outside the station there are many people on the otherside of a line of police.
This was exactly my point in earlier posts: https://www.railforums.co.uk/thread...-lime-street-after-parade.286910/post-7304770 and https://www.railforums.co.uk/thread...treet-after-parade.286910/page-3#post-7304799While on a smaller scale (and I am likely comparing Apples and Oranges), the NUFC flag parade and event went seemingly off far smoother despite the short term notice, the organisers, authorities and transport operators seemed to coordinate well.
Can only agree with this, couldn't believe upthread the same faces were exonerating NR and laying blame with the TOCs. The buck stops with NRs Duty Manager, and their immediate management, who after this further failure should be shuffled.Should heads roll? Absolutely they should! Northern's station team leader on duty that night was trying to communicate with NR and security staff on duty that trains were leaving half empty and requested that more passengers were let through. He was told in no uncertain terms to go away and not interfere with their operation.
There should be an inquiry in to events that unfolded on Monday 26/05/2025 with findings published.
Ignoring the topic being discussed, that really does go both ways! Operators are just as bad.From what I have seen Network Rail have chronic issues with interacting with every type of customer, from TOC to passenger in everything they do, and can be hostile/bureaucratic in the process for the sake of it. Dare I say it is an us vs them mentality, perhaps inherited from the Railtrack days.
As well as the entrance from Lime Street station there are two more I think