• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

December 2023 Timetable Change

Status
Not open for further replies.
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

HamworthyGoods

Established Member
Joined
15 Jan 2019
Messages
4,255

May as be but it’s not what the specifiers/funders (DfT) wanted to buy. GWR has done pretty well to get this change which will benefit many over the line, although I understand it had to be cost neutral so some of the Didcot to Oxford local services have been withdrawn to offset the additional mileage between Redhill and Gatwick. That gives an example of how under scrutiny costs are and why it isn’t possible to justify additional round trips over the entire line at the moment.
 

td97

Established Member
Joined
26 Jul 2017
Messages
1,461
FOI for Northern LTPs, noticeable changes with transfer swaps on 331s, no more 319s and more incoming 323s from WMT.
The diagramming for Blackpool to Manchester is ideal as the (always full and standing) am peaks towards Manchester and pm peaks towards Preston are formed from the same diagrams. And fortunately these are booked 6 cars.
 

Bald Rick

Veteran Member
Joined
28 Sep 2010
Messages
32,412

I woudlnt describe a 5 hour gap in service overnight, on a secondary route to the airport as ‘poor’. The first arrival into Gatwick from the north downs is before 0600. The last departure to the North Downs is 2322. That covers the vast majority of flights.
 

TT-ONR-NRN

Veteran Member
Joined
30 Dec 2016
Messages
11,747
Location
Salford Quays, Manchester
I woudlnt describe a 5 hour gap in service overnight, on a secondary route to the airport as ‘poor’. The first arrival into Gatwick from the north downs is before 0600. The last departure to the North Downs is 2322. That covers the vast majority of flights.
A half twelve departure to Reading would be very much welcomed by many, I’m sure
 

JonathanH

Veteran Member
Joined
29 May 2011
Messages
21,380
Would be a bus to Reigate for half the year...
No. The Quarry line tends to be shut overnight, rather than the route via Redhill. There is a 0041 from Gatwick to Redhill each night, which goes on to Bedford, and the Turbo off the last North Downs arrival heads north empty to Redhill at 0111.

You are of course right that it would cause more issues with overnight closures.

For the next few months there are quite a few overnight closures of Reading to Guildford, resulting in the early train from Reading starting at Guildford.
 

Class 170101

Established Member
Joined
1 Mar 2014
Messages
8,430
But I do wonder how many GW services will actually reach Gatwick in practise, lots of four minute turnarounds at Gatwick I see.


Also some interesting timings on this train, which looks to have a zero minute turnaround at Gatwick for its next working currently.
 

Llandudno

Established Member
Joined
25 Dec 2014
Messages
2,492
I woudlnt describe a 5 hour gap in service overnight, on a secondary route to the airport as ‘poor’. The first arrival into Gatwick from the north downs is before 0600. The last departure to the North Downs is 2322. That covers the vast majority of flights.
But does it though?

2 hour check in means that you can’t use this route for planes departing before 0800

Mind you I am not sure I would risk travelling by train to the airport for an early morning flight, well certainly I wouldn’t risk it to a north of England airport…!
 

JonathanH

Veteran Member
Joined
29 May 2011
Messages
21,380
2 hour check in means that you can’t use this route for planes departing before 0800
A few people using early flights arrive at the airport just before 0100. Not ideal, but the check in desks open after a few hours.
 

Wilts Wanderer

Established Member
Joined
21 Nov 2016
Messages
3,006
But I do wonder how many GW services will actually reach Gatwick in practise, lots of four minute turnarounds at Gatwick I see.


Also some interesting timings on this train, which looks to have a zero minute turnaround at Gatwick for its next working currently.

The 4 minute turnarounds are no different to now - and the vast majority make it through. There is a very slick operation by the platform staff at Gatwick to get it turned round - last time I was there, it took less than 3 mins to get a slightly delayed inbound service away right-time.
 

GoneSouth

Member
Joined
17 Dec 2018
Messages
1,079
The
The 4 minute turnarounds are no different to now - and the vast majority make it through. There is a very slick operation by the platform staff at Gatwick to get it turned round - last time I was there, it took less than 3 mins to get a slightly delayed inbound service away right-time.
Been turfed off more times than I’d like at Redhill myself because of late running, and more annoyingly I’ve turned up at Gatwick with plenty of time to make the Reading train only to fine it starting from Redhill, caught the next train to try to make the connection only to see it leave as we arrive into Redhill. I’d rather go via London now the Elizabeth line speeds you to Paddington from Farringdon
 

Wilts Wanderer

Established Member
Joined
21 Nov 2016
Messages
3,006
The

Been turfed off more times than I’d like at Redhill myself because of late running, and more annoyingly I’ve turned up at Gatwick with plenty of time to make the Reading train only to fine it starting from Redhill, caught the next train to try to make the connection only to see it leave as we arrive into Redhill. I’d rather go via London now the Elizabeth line speeds you to Paddington from Farringdon

Yes, it has happened to me too while en-route to Gatwick with luggage. Unfortunately there will always be a delay threshold that results in short turn back - I suspect even if there was a 20 minute turnround, the BML regulation policies are so strict (i.e. Nothing Must Delay Thameslink) that something out of path would still get turned short anyway.

The paths & turnround are pretty efficient to resource so the plus side of things is that it supports the financial viability of the route as a whole, which is rather important in the current political climate.
 

mangyiscute

Established Member
Joined
6 Mar 2021
Messages
1,482
Location
Reading
The 4 minute turnarounds are no different to now - and the vast majority make it through. There is a very slick operation by the platform staff at Gatwick to get it turned round - last time I was there, it took less than 3 mins to get a slightly delayed inbound service away right-time.
Plus they usually have a decent amount of time at Redhill, I think the turnaround is so short at Gatwick because platform space there is very valuable so it means the train will never be standing there for long. Then if it is late, it usually can catch up at least 5 mins by the time it gets to Reigate.

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==

Perhaps that was the real reason for the addition of Didcot stops on the Paddington/Oxford expresses?
From my point of view adding these stops to the Paddington to Oxford service in order to use one less turbo around Oxford is a much better use of resources and if it is what's allowing the much better service on the North Downs Line, then this is a great change they've implemented. The only disappointment is that on the trains towards London, the services from Worcester are the ones that stop at Didcot since this is the only way to prevent having a turbo sitting in Didcot for ages but overall it's a far better timetable than before.
 

infobleep

On Moderation
Joined
27 Feb 2011
Messages
13,438
The

Been turfed off more times than I’d like at Redhill myself because of late running, and more annoyingly I’ve turned up at Gatwick with plenty of time to make the Reading train only to fine it starting from Redhill, caught the next train to try to make the connection only to see it leave as we arrive into Redhill. I’d rather go via London now the Elizabeth line speeds you to Paddington from Farringdon
At least if it happens from December, on Monday to Saturday for most hours you will only need to wait 30 minutes for the next train. Admittedly now you can get a train 3 minutes later to Redhill, assuming it's not cancelled.

I am occasionally surprised when a late running NDL train isn't turned back short.
 

FenMan

Established Member
Joined
13 Oct 2011
Messages
1,467
Would I be correct in saying the (very welcome) changes on the NDL use 769 timings, hence the mysterious (to me) waits at Guildford? I think I've seen somewhere that the timetable will be tidied up next May using Turbo timings, but could be imagining things?!
 

Wilts Wanderer

Established Member
Joined
21 Nov 2016
Messages
3,006
Would I be correct in saying the (very welcome) changes on the NDL use 769 timings, hence the mysterious (to me) waits at Guildford? I think I've seen somewhere that the timetable will be tidied up next May using Turbo timings, but could be imagining things?!

The December timetable still utilises 769 sectional timings. The waits at Guildford are simply pathing-related; the NDL services having to dovetail between Portsmouth line SWR services.

The June timetable is currently being prepared by Network Rail so there isn’t yet confirmation but my understanding is that Turbo timings will be used - whether this materially affects anything or not remains to be seen.
 

Eoch

Member
Joined
1 Oct 2023
Messages
12
Location
Melbourne
Niche I know, but it looks like Newhaven Harbour gets back an hourly service Monday - Friday, with service every 30 minutes in the peak :D
They have done that by making the trains not stopping at Southease, stop at Newhaven Harbour instead. Trains will alternate between calling at Southease and Newhaven Harbour. They have reduce weekend service to hourly as well.
 

Bald Rick

Veteran Member
Joined
28 Sep 2010
Messages
32,412
A half twelve departure to Reading would be very much welcomed by many, I’m sure

As would, no doubt, departures after 2330 to Lewes and anywhere east of there, and Worthing, Littlehampton, Bognor, Chichester, Portsmouth or anywhere south and west of Horsham. But they don’t. Why should Guidford and Reading be any different?
 

Horizon22

Established Member
Associate Staff
Jobs & Careers
Joined
8 Sep 2019
Messages
9,552
Location
London
A half twelve departure to Reading would be very much welcomed by many, I’m sure

Probably get to Reading about 0200. Most last arrivals at even London Terminals are before then - let alone the train being able to run on any event of engineering works across 2 routes.
 

Wilts Wanderer

Established Member
Joined
21 Nov 2016
Messages
3,006
Probably get to Reading about 0200. Most last arrivals at even London Terminals are before then - let alone the train being able to run on any event of engineering works across 2 routes.

Without onward connections I suspect the only real markets that would be served would be the late night ‘beer jolly’ and whatever 24hr commuting exists for staff working at Gatwick Airport itself.
 

JonathanH

Veteran Member
Joined
29 May 2011
Messages
21,380
whatever 24hr commuting exists for staff working at Gatwick Airport itself
Catered for already by night buses to Crawley, Horley and Redhill, and the existing railway service. Realistically Airport commuting is only local in nature.

Without onward connections I suspect the only real markets that would be served would be the late night ‘beer jolly’
Indeed, although the low cost carriers do have arrivals not served by the current service.

However, even the current last train on the North Downs only has connections to the Portsmouth line from Guildford, Aldershot and Farnham via Ash Vale, Didcot, Oxford, Twyford, Maidenhead and Slough, in addition to the directly served stations.
 

Minstral25

Established Member
Joined
10 Sep 2009
Messages
1,885
Location
Surrey
A half twelve departure to Reading would be very much welcomed by many, I’m sure
Actually I think a 23:20 service from Guildford that would form this departure would be welcomed by far more passengers.

The gap from 22:21 to 00:23 needs filling, especially as most evening shows in Guildford finish around 22:30.
 

Class 170101

Established Member
Joined
1 Mar 2014
Messages
8,430
As would, no doubt, departures after 2330 to Lewes and anywhere east of there, and Worthing, Littlehampton, Bognor, Chichester, Portsmouth or anywhere south and west of Horsham. But they don’t. Why should Guidford and Reading be any different?
Isn't The Redhill to Reading via Guildford a 24 hour route for (Channel Tunnel) freight though?
 

JonathanH

Veteran Member
Joined
29 May 2011
Messages
21,380
Isn't The Redhill to Reading via Guildford a 24 hour route for (Channel Tunnel) freight though?
No. There is no freight that runs between Redhill and Reading via Guildford. Essentially, the only non passenger trains are overnight movements of track plant, typically to and from Woking, and rail head treatment trains.

The need to reverse at Redhill is a major hindrance as regards the Channel Tunnel, and it doesn't really link anywhere that can't be reached using a more convenient route.
 

infobleep

On Moderation
Joined
27 Feb 2011
Messages
13,438
Actually I think a 23:20 service from Guildford that would form this departure would be welcomed by far more passengers.

The gap from 22:21 to 00:23 needs filling, especially as most evening shows in Guildford finish around 22:30.
That would indeed be welcomed by others. Not that I have a need of it.

Just as I'm sure people going out in London welcome the 0:33/0:40 Waterloo to Guildford services that run. The time of it depends on the day of the week.
 

cactustwirly

Established Member
Joined
10 Apr 2013
Messages
7,885
Location
UK
Without onward connections I suspect the only real markets that would be served would be the late night ‘beer jolly’ and whatever 24hr commuting exists for staff working at Gatwick Airport itself.

And a lot of flight arrivals, Gatwick has no curfew so has a lot flights landing between 11 and 1am
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top