Trainfan2019
Member
- Joined
- 9 Aug 2019
- Messages
- 478
Just read on national rail that there's been a derailment at Ardwick depot. Anyone know any more details?
"DISRUPTION UPDATE - Due to a derailment at Ardwick Depot, services to and from Manchester Piccadilly will be affected this morning until at least 10:00"
Now saying disruption until 13:00 at the earliest, not going to be a good day for Northern & TPE on this side of the Pennines
I would say the effect on TPE has been infinitely greater than on NT. By my reckoning only two NT units were trapped, but with TPE it was at least four.
I was aiming for the 07:15 from Congleton to Stoke but it was cancelled as a result along with the next one (08:23).
I got the 09:24 service which ran as 156455
View attachment 71657
I was aiming for the 07:15 from Congleton to Stoke but it was cancelled as a result along with the next one (08:23).
I got the 09:24 service which ran as 156455
View attachment 71657
The cancellation of the 0715 was a direct consequence of the derailment, the booked unit comes from Ardwick. What should have been the 0823 was terminated at Macclesfield, being horrendously late, the forming journey (0721 Hazel Grove - Piccadilly) having been similarly late, and the outward 0651 Piccadilly - Hazel Grove. The forming journey for that, 0630 Stockport CMD - Picc was cancelled, so there's no obvious way to tell what happened there.
The EMU which should have done the 0844 Picc - Stoke looks to have been 'borrowed' to do the 0803 Picc - Glossop/Hadfield Circular. I don't know where 156455 came from, according to RTT it miraculously appeared in P5 at Picc, but there are DMUs available by 0844.
Well, so much for DMUs being supposedly barred from Picc- Stoke! 156455 looks to have done okay to Stockport, but lost ten minutes between there and Kidsgrove, nicely delaying both a XC and VT (Avanti).
They are not barred (and obviously EMT run them Kidsgrove to Stoke) but Northern have to get permission to run them in a path designed for a 90mph EMU.Well, so much for DMUs being supposedly barred from Picc- Stoke! 156455 looks to have done okay to Stockport, but lost ten minutes between there and Kidsgrove, nicely delaying both a XC and VT (Avanti).
323234 is the unit involved (was coupled to 323230 at the time).Looks to be 323238, 234 or 226 that's had the mishap given the new Northern branding.
They are not barred (and obviously EMT run them Kidsgrove to Stoke) but Northern have to get permission to run them in a path designed for a 90mph EMU.
Network Rail (signallers)Have to get permission from whom?
Quite!Not bad going. Day two of using the new sidings for the 323s and one is on the deck already.
There's a eastern exit from Ardwick depot to Ashbury's, I'm surprised any units were "trapped" there....
Looking at the photos, hasn't the unit come to rest across the throat of the stabling sidings? They're single ended, nothing already stabled there would be able to get out.There's a eastern exit from Ardwick depot to Ashbury's, I'm surprised any units were "trapped" there....
Plus the Eastern exit isn't wired.Looking at the photos, hasn't the unit come to rest across the throat of the stabling sidings? They're single ended, nothing already stabled there would be able to get out.
With a 6 car formation then access to the main maintenance shed may well have been blocked for a while as well, until the non-derailed unit could be detached and moved.
Quickly doodled image attached of where I believe the two units came to rest, based on layout of pointwork, location of overhead wire stanchions and gantries, floodlights and canopies over the fuel roads in the photos shared on Twitter. Derailed unit 323234 shown in red, 323230 in blue.
Looking at the photos, hasn't the unit come to rest across the throat of the stabling sidings? They're single ended, nothing already stabled there would be able to get out.
With a 6 car formation then access to the main maintenance shed may well have been blocked for a while as well, until the non-derailed unit could be detached and moved.
Quickly doodled image attached of where I believe the two units came to rest, based on layout of pointwork, location of overhead wire stanchions and gantries, floodlights and canopies over the fuel roads in the photos shared on Twitter. Derailed unit 323234 shown in red, 323230 in blue.
Looking at the photos, hasn't the unit come to rest across the throat of the stabling sidings? They're single ended, nothing already stabled there would be able to get out.
With a 6 car formation then access to the main maintenance shed may well have been blocked for a while as well, until the non-derailed unit could be detached and moved.
Quickly doodled image attached of where I believe the two units came to rest, based on layout of pointwork, location of overhead wire stanchions and gantries, floodlights and canopies over the fuel roads in the photos shared on Twitter. Derailed unit 323234 shown in red, 323230 in blue.
Not bad going. Day two of using the new sidings for the 323s and one is on the deck already.
ControllersNetwork Rail (signallers)