It's one of those days today - a person has just been hit at Hayes and Harlington - all services out of Paddington are suspended.
believed to be a p/way worker 'clipped' by a train
It's one of those days today - a person has just been hit at Hayes and Harlington - all services out of Paddington are suspended.
Info from NR:believed to be a p/way worker 'clipped' by a train
0907 Oxford - Paddington has struck a person in HV clothing in the Airport Jcn area.
Internal sources have confirmed he was a lookout.
He's in hospital and is recovering. He's damaged his shoulder and broken his arm. Otherwise ok.
Internal sources have confirmed he was a lookout.
He's in hospital and is recovering. He's damaged his shoulder and broken his arm. Otherwise ok.
Turns out he was a Contractor not NR staff. Glad he survived!
I saw the stats last week of how many of our colleagues working lineside get struck by trains and it is astonishingly and embarrassingly high. Even more astonishing is the number who survive (like this lucky chap) - indeed you are more likely to survive than not. Presumably this is because many are people who *think* they are in a place of safety, but have left a part of their person marginally in the way, and get 'nicked' by a part of the train.
I'm pleased that the person was so lightly injured.
But is it relevant that they are a contractor? Perhaps someone not so instilled with the need for care to be taken than "staff"? But I imagine that new staff need the safety ethos instilled in them and that the same process is used for contractors.
As far as NR concerned, it is irrelevant if they are contractors or not. They are people working on the railway, and we have a duty of care to look after them.
Obviously not a very good one!Internal sources have confirmed he was a lookout.
He's in hospital and is recovering. He's damaged his shoulder and broken his arm. Otherwise ok.
A very lucky man indeed! He was clipped by a train on the Up Relief.
I would thus assume that the train was slowing to stop at Hayes and Harlington station, so may not have been going too fast.
I'm pleased that the person was so lightly injured.
But is it relevant that they are a contractor? Perhaps someone not so instilled with the need for care to be taken than "staff"? But I imagine that new staff need the safety ethos instilled in them and that the same process is used for contractors.
The point was he was not P/way as previously mentioned...
No offence but people on here sometimes seriously read far too much between the lines :roll:
Obviously not a very good one!
Very lucky man indeed, the fact he is a contractor shouldnt make any difference but anyone working on the tracks will tell you that it can make a huge difference.
There are good and bad contractors as well as NR staff , although there does seem to be a higher percentage of poor contract staff.
I am not saying he is a bad one just that the thought of the "lookout" getting hit by a train does strike me as rather scary.
My pet hate is track workers not aknowledging us drivers when we sound the horn, FFS just put an arm up for a few seconds it isnt much to ask!
I do understand about "looking at the same stretch of track" plus of course it isnt always easy to see what track a train is on etc.
I am not saying he is a bad one just that the thought of the "lookout" getting hit by a train does strike me as rather scary.
My pet hate is track workers not aknowledging us drivers when we sound the horn, FFS just put an arm up for a few seconds it isnt much to ask!
I do understand about "looking at the same stretch of track" plus of course it isnt always easy to see what track a train is on etc.
My pet hate is track workers not aknowledging us drivers when we sound the horn, FFS just put an arm up for a few seconds it isnt much to ask!
My pet hate is track workers not aknowledging us drivers when we sound the horn, FFS just put an arm up for a few seconds it isnt much to ask!
Good to hear.I always acknowledge you!
I always did wonder how much it bothered train drivers if people didn't, as long as we were clearly getting out of the way.
To be honest , lots, although the Pway have stepped clear, have they moved clear for the train or have they moved back to look at something before going back on the track, I always keep an eye on them until they are out of my sight.
Without the acknowledgement there is always that element of doubt in my mind.
It was a FGW service involved in the incident at Airport Jn - 2P38 09:07 Oxford - Paddington; though the 09:33 Paddington - Heathrow did indeed get cancelled at Ealing Broadway due to a pantograph fault on that unit.I was at Ealing Broadway during this disruption, announcements said that a person was hit near Hayes and Harlington, but also that a train was broken down at Ealing Broadway.
Does anyone know if this train was the one that was involved in the incident? It was a Heathrow connect train, on platform 3, which was towed away by another H-connect the wrong way up the line towards paddington.
Meanwhile this happened platform 1 was opened, but I don't think anything stopped there, with platform 3 being cleared within 20 mins or less I believe.