To be fair you could equip a bus with Lazy-boy armchairs, a complimentary hot tub, and scantily-clad flunkies feeding the passengers peeled grapes... and you still wouldn't tempt people out of their BMW X5s!
Absolutely true.
Also, and I appreciate it's
@Bletchleyite's opinion but passengers don't view air conditioning and double glazing as essentials. Not compared to many other aspects although what that has to do with whether electric buses can manage on hills escapes me.
Certainly, the move to electric vehicles has a multitude of benefits in terms of localised emissions but with the move to greener power generation, the old adage of simply moving pollution from city streets (diesel vehicles) to power station stacks (emissions from coal/gas fuelled power stations) is no longer valid to the same extent. Dare I say it but the issue of engine vibration (most noticeably bad in stuff like e200s and Streetlites) will be removed and improve the travelling experience. The issue is, as always, in terms of battery life and range but those are clearly improving and hills should not be a major issue.
To my mind, the argument has to be in supporting the bus industry to become zero-emission in our major towns and cities as a pre-cursor to limiting private car usage on clean air grounds. That said, the Bath CAZ will penalise the bus operator for using a 63 plate e200 (euro V) but not for average joe driving into town in their 1994 diesel Volvo estate!