• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Do Leaning on Doors make the train slower?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Simon Poole

Member
Joined
21 Apr 2010
Messages
549
Location
Brereton, Rugeley, Staffordshire
I was on my way to London St Pancras/Kings Cross, can't remember which tube line it was on but after leaving Euston Square Tube Station before London St Pancras/Kings Cross, the tube train departed slowly and a announcment was made, please do not lean on the doors or we won't make it to Pancras/Kings Cross, seconds later the tube train began to move faster and an thank you was announced

Just wondering that if you mean heavilly on a tube train door does it make it slower?
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Pumbaa

Established Member
Joined
19 Feb 2008
Messages
5,003
Yes. They also require you run very fast on the spot a la the flintstones to get any decent speed up.

Joking aside, I haven't the foggiest what you heard, but you probably misheard an announcement. If there is a special tube issue with the doors though, I hope someone can shed some light.
 

ralphchadkirk

Established Member
Joined
20 Oct 2008
Messages
5,755
Location
Essex
Possibly leaning on the doors kept momentarily knocking the interlock out? Not familiar with the processes on tube stock though.
 

N Levers

Member
Joined
22 Dec 2010
Messages
308
Leaning on Bakerloo line doors in particular can cause the train brakes to apply...
 

Pumbaa

Established Member
Joined
19 Feb 2008
Messages
5,003
If that's the case Id imagine that the stock Simon was on was either C or A stock. But thanks for that gem - very interesting.

Come to think of it, I'm sure on the C stock the operators can open the doors while the train is still moving.
 

ralphchadkirk

Established Member
Joined
20 Oct 2008
Messages
5,755
Location
Essex
If that's the case Id imagine that the stock Simon was on was either C or A stock. But thanks for that gem - very interesting.

Come to think of it, I'm sure on the C stock the operators can open the doors while the train is still moving.

As I said, I'm really not sure about it. It's the only thing that sprung to mind that would fit in really!
 

150222

Member
Joined
9 Jul 2011
Messages
1,002
If that's the case Id imagine that the stock Simon was on was either C or A stock. But thanks for that gem - very interesting.

Come to think of it, I'm sure on the C stock the operators can open the doors while the train is still moving.



The passenger doors on c-stock can be opened when the train is going at less than 5 mph. The cab doors are not interlocked.
 

Mojo

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Administrator
Joined
7 Aug 2005
Messages
20,872
Location
0035
Not aware of any specific issues on Bakerloo line, but 1992 stock on the Central line has the biggest issues. It is not so much leaning on the doors, but if you lean on the doors, when the train accelerates it causes you to move one way, thus unintentionally forcing the door open.
 

trentside

Established Member
Joined
14 Aug 2010
Messages
3,341
Location
Messroom
Possibly leaning on the doors kept momentarily knocking the interlock out? Not familiar with the processes on tube stock though.

That's what was likely happening. All LU stocks are equipped with an interlock, on the older trains (not sure about newer stocks) this is visually indicated to the driver by a blue pilot light in the cab. If there is no light, motoring is cut out.
 

Peter Mugridge

Veteran Member
Joined
8 Apr 2010
Messages
16,334
Location
Epsom
Couldn't have been the new S Stock could it? That has quite sensitive doors and very little seating relative to standing space.
 

tsr

Established Member
Joined
15 Nov 2011
Messages
7,400
Location
Between the parallel lines
I use the Victoria line the most of all of the LU lines, and the situation the OP describes is incredibly common on the trains on there. The train motor indeed cuts out if anyone pushes the doors. It's virtually always a mistake on the passenger's behalf, and overcrowding can cause issues. The announcement that "these newer trains will not leave the platform unless you do not lean on the doors" is made countless times both on trains and platforms during busy periods.

I believe, but I'm not sure, that the S Stock is built in such a way that this problem should not occur.
 

Simon Poole

Member
Joined
21 Apr 2010
Messages
549
Location
Brereton, Rugeley, Staffordshire
Thinking about it, it could had been the 2009 stock, if not would be the C Stock, it wasn''t A Stock or S Stock becuase they were having problems from Aldgate to Baker Street on the Met,

honestly i might had misheard becuase i can't remember the whole woord for word on the tannoy system

But i think it was more of the Victoria Line 2009 Stock but i can't remember :oops:
 

trentside

Established Member
Joined
14 Aug 2010
Messages
3,341
Location
Messroom
The 2009 Stock is not helped by the 'Sesitive Edges' on the doors which detect obstructions, re-open and close just the affected door. In practice this is supposed to prevent the train operator having to release and re-close the doors on the whole train while extra people try to quickly board. This should only be necessary (in practice) when the sensitive edges comtinue to detect an obstruction (it gives up after 3 attempts).

Problems have arisen with this system being overly sensitive and when people attempt to hold open the door which is attempting the re-close procedure.
 

Peter Mugridge

Veteran Member
Joined
8 Apr 2010
Messages
16,334
Location
Epsom
It wouldn't be 2009 stock from the stated Euston Square to King's Cross though - although it could be from Euston to King's Cross.
 

WinterChief

Member
Joined
11 Jun 2011
Messages
49
Just to clarify, leaning on the doors does cause the motors to cut out, meaning the train will coast on the majority of LUL stocks.

Obstacle Detection and Sensitive Edge are different. Obstacle detection reopens the door 3 times. Sensitive edge only kicks in when the doors are closed and locked and something like a strap is caught. When the strap is pulled it applies the brakes.
 

trentside

Established Member
Joined
14 Aug 2010
Messages
3,341
Location
Messroom
Obstacle Detection and Sensitive Edge are different. Obstacle detection reopens the door 3 times. Sensitive edge only kicks in when the doors are closed and locked and something like a strap is caught. When the strap is pulled it applies the brakes.

Ah right, the way it had been described to me previously made it sound like the Sensitive Edge was the only system at work.
 

Simon Poole

Member
Joined
21 Apr 2010
Messages
549
Location
Brereton, Rugeley, Staffordshire
It wouldn't be 2009 stock from the stated Euston Square to King's Cross though - although it could be from Euston to King's Cross.

Honestly i was traveling around to London St Pancras/Kings Cross more than once that day, i'm not sure if it was Euston Square or Euston, all i can remember is that the announcement was put out before St Pancras or London Kings Cross but i'm thinking it not Euston Sqaure and it's Euston on the Victoria Line while heading to Highbury & Islington
 

Peter Mugridge

Veteran Member
Joined
8 Apr 2010
Messages
16,334
Location
Epsom
Ah, then that's definitely 2009 stock, which is known to have door sensitivity issues on both counts.
 

Dstock7080

Established Member
Joined
17 Feb 2010
Messages
3,130
Location
West London
Ah, then that's definitely 2009 stock, which is known to have door sensitivity issues on both counts.
So do S Stock from Euston Square to King's Cross St. Pancras.
--- old post above --- --- new post below ---
The passenger doors on c-stock can be opened when the train is going at less than 5 mph. The cab doors are not interlocked.
C Stock doors can only be opened below 5MPH when inside the CSDE loop at stations.

The cab doors are interlocked but it is common (and agreed practice) to over-ride the interlocks.
 

12CSVT

Established Member
Joined
18 Aug 2010
Messages
2,611
Leaning on Bakerloo line doors in particular can cause the train brakes to apply...

Precisely that happened on a southbound Jubilee Line train on Tuesday during the evening peak. I know because I was on it. Several standing passengers were thrown foreward.
 

Dstock7080

Established Member
Joined
17 Feb 2010
Messages
3,130
Location
West London
Leaning on Bakerloo line doors in particular can cause the train brakes to apply...
Leaning on the doors of Bakerloo Line (1972 Stock) does not cause the brakes to apply. It would break the door interlock circuit which also causes the motors stop accelerating, if pulling out of a station this would cause a rough jolt. This usually returns the interlocks to normal.
If the 'pilot-light' has not returned, the brakes should then be applied by the Operator.
 

tsr

Established Member
Joined
15 Nov 2011
Messages
7,400
Location
Between the parallel lines
Leaning on the doors of Bakerloo Line (1972 Stock) does not cause the brakes to apply. It would break the door interlock circuit which also causes the motors stop accelerating, if pulling out of a station this would cause a rough jolt. This usually returns the interlocks to normal.
If the 'pilot-light' has not returned, the brakes should then be applied by the Operator.

That sounds familiar to me, even as an infrequent passenger on the Bakerloo.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top