ctrspotting
On Moderation
Which do you prefer I personally think 221 I wanna hear you're opinion
Yeah makes sense the snack car is too smallVoyagers have nice big windows, but there the advantages end, particularly compared to the refurbished Pendolino which, bar the slightly iffy shop, is just superb.
Had one from New St to MKC on Sunday. The platform was so thick with fug that I could barely breathe, and the stench of fumes remained inside throughout.
Before the refurbishment I would have said the 390 was the better train; but now I have to agree with you.The voyager is the best of two bad options personally. Not keen on either but the Pendolino always used to make me feel claustrophobic. I don’t travel with Avanti anymore anyway due to being able to get a couple of dodgy experiences, trains I don’t enjoy travelling on and better service elsewhere and so haven’t had a refurbed pendolino, though I would imagine they are still as claustrophobic as ever so still goes to voyager.
How to use Avanti again? At this point, I don't know; unless my local ticket office stays open and I can reserve a window (yes a genuine window) seat! So-called window seats that are actually bulk-head seats surely contravene the trades descriptions act?
Many thanks for the suggestions, I'll try to use the Forum next time.While it requires knowing which seats match windows (all the priority and I think table seats do, and you may prefer these anyway) you can select a specific seat on both the Forum ticketing site/Trainsplit (same thing) and on Avanti's own site.
I don’t enjoy travelling on and better service elsewhere and so haven’t had a refurbed pendolino, though I would imagine they are still as claustrophobic as ever so still goes to voyager.
The refurbishment has made them considerably less relaxing to travel on, in my view. The unrefurbished sets are probably my favourite trains in Britain (the ride quality is hard to beat), but these new seats are way too tall for the 390’s narrow profile. I have also never really felt claustrophobic before, but do get it when in an airline seat on a refurbished Pendolino, especially without a window.What do others think about the refurbished 390's big grey seats?
Personally, I'm not a fan overall. I don't usually recognise the criticisms levelled at different types of seating on this forum, but in my opinion these seats are too tall and too hard, though the legroom is excellent.What do others think about the refurbished 390's big grey seats?
What do others think about the refurbished 390's big grey seats?
Better legroom in airline seats, but as a skinny 6footer I find them uncomfortable and awful on a long journey. If I’ve got a table seat I end up leaning forward on it a bit to give my back and legs a change.What do others think about the refurbished 390's big grey seats?
the refurbished pendolino are very nice. Much better ambiance than the un refurbished ones.
They're some of the best seats of any train (in standard class, I don't use first) in the country.What do others think about the refurbished 390's big grey seats?
Completely agreed, lighting makes a huge difference to ambience. This is sort of what I mean, the 390 refurbishment would be great, I just think the seats are too tall for the trains in question. But, at this point, I’ll never be satisfied! It’s nothing egregious.Most notably they seem to be one of the few units to get lighting right. It's slightly brighter and slightly whiter than it was, meaning the feel isn't dingy, but unlike so much other stock they aren't overlit either.
There is a lot to be said for the quality of the light provided by having background indirect lighting from LED strips as well as LED spots down the aisle. It seems to be a setup that "just works". The TPE 397s and I think the 196s have that sort of setup as well and it is a lot classier and less garish than direct LED lighting as found on e.g. 195s and 197s.
I second this.the refurbished pendolino are very nice. Much better ambiance than the un refurbished ones.
Before the refurbishment I would have said the 390 was the better train; but now I have to agree with you.
The refurbished 390 seats are bigger and far more restrictive of the view, to the extent that after decades of being able to tolerate the 390 environment I recently had my first genuine feeling of claustrophobia. I need to set my gaze on distant objects in order to relax, not be trapped in a grey cell! The conductor thought I looked pale and moved me to the "naughty seats" outside her office in coach C; whereupon I was able to relax.
How to use Avanti again? At this point, I don't know; unless my local ticket office stays open and I can reserve a window (yes a genuine window) seat! So-called window seats that are actually bulk-head seats surely contravene the trades descriptions act?
I am surprised they could get much worse! Luckily I live on the east side of the country so have little/no need to travel on Avanti anymore. A shame as the 390s definitely have the potential, they just can’t fulfil it.The refurbishment has made them considerably less relaxing to travel on, in my view. The unrefurbished sets are probably my favourite trains in Britain (the ride quality is hard to beat), but these new seats are way too tall for the 390’s narrow profile. I have also never really felt claustrophobic before, but do get it when in an airline seat on a refurbished Pendolino, especially without a window.
It’s a shame, as they did need a refurbishment, and I think it would be brilliant if applied to any other train, but interior design needs to be done differently with Pendolinos.
@DarloRich ”Pooh fumes”the stench of fumes remained inside throughout.
not on a 390 anymore It is really the XC voyager that has the problem with fumes!”Pooh fumes”
About where l am at.They're blue other than the headrest?
They are the best UK Standard class seat I can remember ever having sat in, beating the venerable Grammer IC3000 in my book. Really like them. And really like the extra 2" or so of legroom the sensible design of the seat back provides, properly taking into account that most people with long legs are men, and most men can't sit comfortably with their knees pressed together due to the male anatomy, so the extra legroom should be at the side of the seat back, not a central niche like the badly-designed original Pendolino seat/158 seat/FISA LEAN, so you want the support in the middle. The Fainsa Sophia (for its sins) and the Class 175/180 seat also do this right.
Only thing they lack is a cup/can recess on the tray table, so these can slide about a bit on curves, and the armrests should probably be solid topped instead of the fake leather which is wearing a bit, and I'd probably (now just getting picky) prefer a grey fake-leather antimacassar piece to avoid them getting mucky from people with greasy hair as the off-white headrest probably will.
I can't wait! (a claustrophobe)Posters here who dislike the claustrophobia of the 390s will love the IETs which feel much more airy, but take a huge hit to ride quality. IETs bounce shake and wobble a lot.
Posters here who dislike the claustrophobia of the 390s will love the IETs which feel much more airy, but take a huge hit to ride quality. IETs bounce shake and wobble a lot.