SuperLuke2334
Established Member
They will lose time whilst the crew get used to them. Reliability will improve, I'm confident of it.Even 1W96 Cardiff to Holyhead is starting to loose time.
They will lose time whilst the crew get used to them. Reliability will improve, I'm confident of it.Even 1W96 Cardiff to Holyhead is starting to loose time.
Traction motor failure on 67015, now.been replaced by 670121V33 only got as far as the first signal out of Manchester Piccadilly this morning before coming to a stand. Limped back into the station about 30 minutes late
So did the 2 previous trains both 175s so highly likely to be an infrastructure issue.Even 1W96 Cardiff to Holyhead is starting to loose time.
Something happened to HD06 because that’s been in Holyhead all weekendWell, from RTT, 1V33 was cancelled and 1V91 was started at Chester (presumably the set coming from Crewe).
But the northbounds and subsequent legs operated, if mostly running behind time.
Is that not fairly "normal" these days?
67022 on that set failed. Couldn't get it back to Crewe with the rescue loco due to engineering works. Hence why 017 went over today to replace 022.Something happened to HD06 because that’s been in Holyhead all weekend
Mostly due to being cautioned for an overhanging tree.Even 1W96 Cardiff to Holyhead is starting to loose time.
Dragging brakes on 67022 so both stuck until DB have a look at itSpotted 67022 and 67017 on a siding at Bangor this morning. ( 08:10 22 April )
View attachment 133952
The reliability stats for this class can't be good!Dragging brakes on 67022 so both stuck until DB have a look at it
They Certainly aren't this week, some trains havent made it from start to finish once this week! It's been truly dismal. A lot of the faults have been minor but still doesn't instill much confidence.The reliability stats for this class can't be good!
There's a reason why Chiltern, despite being part of DB, were rather keen to dump them...They Certainly aren't this week, some trains havent made it from start to finish once this week! It's been truly dismal. A lot of the faults have been minor but still doesn't instill much confidence.
The coaches themselves are getting pretty reliable with very few faults now occuring but just recently the locos are heading backwards A lot of the issues are with the ones which came out of storage proving especially troublesome.
Are 68s compatible with the Mk4 sets though?There's a reason why Chiltern, despite being part of DB, were rather keen to dump them...
Why TFW didn't go for a contract with DRS and their 68s I don't know. They also have a depot in Crewe and numbers of available locos.
No. The modifications are for working with 67s only. There are also no 68s available, at least not enough of them.Are 68s compatible with the Mk4 sets though?
Are 68s compatible with the Mk4 sets though?
That doesn't mean they couldn't be made compatible - the 67s weren't originally either after all. But unless TPE or Chiltern give some up (not outside the realms of possibility in either case) it's not an option right now.No. The modifications are for working with 67s only. There are also no 68s available, at least not enough of them.
The Scotrail HSTs have suffered from appalling reliability as well.Sounds like they'd have been better off taking the HSTs like Scotland did.
Too early to say. Hopefully not. Lots of previously unreliable fleets get better in time, and we're still a long way off a full 197 service on the marches.Does that mean there won't be a normal service (with the intended stock) on the mainline through Shrewsbury until the line is fully 197ed?
But the likes of power door mods are much more extreme than shoving 42 new wires through the coaches and a couple of extra relays.Sounds like they'd have been better off taking the HSTs like Scotland did. Does that mean there won't be a normal service (with the intended stock) on the mainline through Shrewsbury until the line is fully 197ed?
Why would TPE or Chiltern have to give up some 68s if TfW were to want 68s? Surely the 68s that DRS has on freight services could be covered more-easily (since a non-ETH loco would presumably be suitable) than TPE or Chiltern examples (yes, many of the DRS-liveried 68s would need push-pull controls fitted etc. but as you say that could presumably be sorted if needed)?That doesn't mean they couldn't be made compatible - the 67s weren't originally either after all. But unless TPE or Chiltern give some up (not outside the realms of possibility in either case) it's not an option right now.
The franchise documents (back when the mark 4s were only going to be used on Holyhead-Cardiff) state that only 3 locos would be leased (one for each set planned at the time) https://trc.cymru/sites/default/files/documents/Sched 1.6_Appendices Table 2a.pdf. Surely 68s would have been an option back then (when the choice was made and only 3 were needed), despite the fact that it would not be practical to change now that the decision has been made to fit the mark 4s for operation with 67s.There are also no 68s available, at least not enough of them.
We have leased our class 67 locomotives until only 2028 and are working with suppliers on options for low or zero emission replacements.
I was assuming that DRS didn't have any spare locos they could use to displace the 68s to TfW. Are there many locos as good at hauling freight as a 68 is available?Why would TPE or Chiltern have to give up some 68s if TfW were to want 68s? Surely the 68s that DRS has on freight services could be covered more-easily (since a non-ETH loco would presumably be suitable) than TPE or Chiltern examples (yes, many of the DRS-liveried 68s would need push-pull controls fitted etc. but as you say that could presumably be sorted if needed)?
By sticking with 67s for the MKIVs it meant only 2 days training for the existing loco drivers converting from MKIII to MKIVs. The full training course for TfW drivers from scratch on 67s is 3 weeks - I'm guessing something similar would have been needed for 68s. At the time, the relatively low service levels meant there wasn't a need to train any extra drivers on locos, only convert the existing ones.The franchise documents (back when the mark 4s were only going to be used on Holyhead-Cardiff) state that only 3 locos would be leased (one for each set planned at the time) https://trc.cymru/sites/default/files/documents/Sched 1.6_Appendices Table 2a.pdf. Surely 68s would have been an option back then (when the choice was made and only 3 were needed), despite the fact that it would not be practical to change now that the decision has been made to fit the mark 4s for operation with 67s.
There was a suggestion somewhere in the original franchise documents that they'd look to convert from 67s to 68s towards the end of the decade - but those documents are, like the franchise itself, now long disappeared. I'd like to think depending on how well the class 99s turn out for GBRF we may well see in a few years the development of a Bi-mode loco powerful enough to haul 6 cars up and down the Marches at line speed on diesel, and they'll replace the 67s, but I don't think we're quite there yet.Another bit of info that document presents is that the lease end date was 16/10/2033 - however the Welsh Government's national transport delivery plan (page 72) claims that:
Thanks, easy to see why they stuck with 67s in that case.By sticking with 67s for the MKIVs it meant only 2 days training for the existing loco drivers converting from MKIII to MKIVs. The full training course for TfW drivers from scratch on 67s is 3 weeks - I'm guessing something similar would have been needed for 68s. At the time, the relatively low service levels meant there wasn't a need to train any extra drivers on locos, only convert the existing ones.
It’s HD04.Does anyone know which set is on 1W55 today? Thanks.
It either gives the little image (which is inaccurate if a GC set turns up), or the number, but oddly never both.I'm planning a trip on the MK4s from Manchester to Cardiff after the May timetable change.
- Has it been confirmed yet which services will be diagrammed to operate between Manchester and Cardiff from the change?
- Is there a reliable way to know which MK4 sets are operating on a particular diagram? Realtimetrains doesn't always seem to give the set number.
Thanks a lot
On weekdays The only departures from Manchester planned to be Mk4s straight away at the timetable are 06:27, 12:30 and 14:30 from Manchester and also the arrivals at 20:15 and 22:15 which return ecs.I'm planning a trip on the MK4s from Manchester to Cardiff after the May timetable change.
- Has it been confirmed yet which services will be diagrammed to operate between Manchester and Cardiff from the change?
- Is there a reliable way to know which MK4 sets are operating on a particular diagram? Realtimetrains doesn't always seem to give the set number.
Thanks a lot
And then I seem to remember 20:30, as well as being the only even-houred train to go all the way down that won’t be booked 67, is planned for what will eventually be the only 2 carriage 197 formation to run on the Shrewsbury Cardiff corridor?On weekdays The only departures from Manchester planned to be Mk4s straight away at the timetable are 06:27, 12:30 and 14:30 from Manchester and also the arrivals at 20:15 and 22:15 which return ecs.
08:30 and 16:30 from Manchester are planned to be added "early June"
10:30 and 18:30 departures are planned to be added "mid-June"
Saturdays should have 06:27, 10:30, 12:30, 14:30 and 18:30 from timetable change with the 08:30 and 16:30 added 2 weeks later. 20:15 and 22:15 arrival also Mk4s which return ecs
Sundays should be 09:30 and 15:30 departures plus the 19:15 arrival which returns ecs.
Yes that's right as it will split at Manchester off the 19:15 from Milford Haven with half forming the 19:30 back to Cardiff and the other half forming the 20:30 Cardiff.And then I seem to remember 20:30, as well as being the only even-houred train to go all the way down that won’t be booked 67, is planned for what will eventually be the only 2 carriage 197 formation to run on the Shrewsbury Cardiff corridor?
That single service being the only 2 carriage formation to run between Shrewsbury and Cardiff, with everything else as 3/5-197 or 5-MK4 is very impressive indeed considering how much 2 car running there is on this busy stretch these days. Almost all of the 3 cars are Holyheads too, which seem generally less busy than the often packed Manchesters. TfW should be commended for that, regardless of the dramas they've had of late.Yes that's right as it will split at Manchester off the 19:15 from Milford Haven with half forming the 19:30 back to Cardiff and the other half forming the 20:30 Cardiff.
Once it's all up and running it will be a game changer with a much more consistent product.That single service being the only 2 carriage formation to run between Shrewsbury and Cardiff, with everything else as 3/5-197 or 5-MK4 is very impressive indeed considering how much 2 car running there is on this busy stretch these days. Almost all of the 3 cars are Holyheads too, which seem generally less busy than the often packed Manchesters. TfW should be commended for that, regardless of the dramas they've had of late.
20:30 being a 2 coach unit... that will be cosy on Saturday nights when it forms the last direct train beyond Shrewsbury. Especially for Wilmslow & Crewe passengers as Avanti have stopped running via Crewe at that time of night leaving only an hourly stopper.And then I seem to remember 20:30, as well as being the only even-houred train to go all the way down that won’t be booked 67, is planned for what will eventually be the only 2 carriage 197 formation to run on the Shrewsbury Cardiff corridor?
Perhaps that needs to be made pick up only at Stockport and Wilmslow then..
20:30 being a 2 coach unit... that will be cosy on Saturday nights when it forms the last direct train beyond Shrewsbury. Especially for Wilmslow & Crewe passengers as Avanti have stopped running via Crewe at that time of night leaving only an hourly stopper.
A more consistent product? I guess it depends on when you are comparing it with - if you go back to Arriva Trains Wales' standard pattern timetable the Manchester to Milford Haven / Carmarthen was pretty solidly an hourly service formed of class 175s (never in mutiple, so a mix of 2-car and 3-car). ATW's offering was very inadequate in terms of capacity between Manchester and Swansea, but it was pretty consistent. On the other hand, it wouldn't be difficult to be more-consistent than the current offer from TfW (with some 175s I assume being still grounded following the fires, leading to a stark contrast of 2-car 150s on some services and the mark 4 sets on other workings). 5-cars on nearly every TfW service between Manchester and Swansea will be a very welcome improvement in terms of capacity, but a mix of 197s and mark 4s will still be less consistent than ATW's wall-to-wall 175s Mondays to Saturdays (although on Saturdays the monotony of 175s to Milford Haven was relieved slightly by a single SO 158 diagram).Once it's all up and running it will be a game changer with a much more consistent product.That single service being the only 2 carriage formation to run between Shrewsbury and Cardiff, with everything else as 3/5-197 or 5-MK4 is very impressive indeed considering how much 2 car running there is on this busy stretch these days. Almost all of the 3 cars are Holyheads too, which seem generally less busy than the often packed Manchesters. TfW should be commended for that, regardless of the dramas they've had of late.
How many sets in service is that (both for the start of the new timetable and for the increased workings 2 weeks later)?Saturdays should have 06:27, 10:30, 12:30, 14:30 and 18:30 from timetable change with the 08:30 and 16:30 added 2 weeks later. 20:15 and 22:15 arrival also Mk4s which return ecs