The only annoying thing with them being high spec is that when they are displaced on the 500, Glasgow never seems to be able to keep them and they go down south.
I honestly don’t get why First always favoured single decks over a decker with such a big city like Glasgow. A route like the 2 (previously the 62) has had singles on it since First took over. Hopefully like some other routes they’ll realise that deckers are still needed.
As for the next order I think they may need some more E200MMCs to fully wipe out the remaining B7Ls and B10BLEs.
In part, you have to to remember the issues with First Group nationally. For instance, with the large batch of 62 plate e300s, they'd had 4/5 years of significant underinvestment following the Laidlaw purchase nationally. PSVAR regs were fast approaching and they had a very old fleet so it made sense to invest in large numbers of single deckers rather than a smaller number of doubles.
In addition, there are certain bus company managers who just do not like double deckers because of the downsides - a large part of the travelling public being pensioners who are less enamoured with walking up stairs, longer dwell times at stops, increased level of vandalism etc. Seen this in the past with other major urban operations (e.g. both Stagecoach and Arriva in Merseyside) where deckers were out of fashion for a while.
Maybe a branded one is off the roadQuite often unbranded one on 75 , surely theres enough 75 branded for the 75.
The b7ls will all be withdrawn soon with the B10BLEs holding out a little longer though.
On another note, noticed one of the caetano darts on the short 240 and it sounded poorly and struggling to go up the hill coming into forgewood.
Been on plenty and they fly up that but this one was all noise and very little movement. Obviously the Lanarkshire/Glasgow life is taking its toll on them as they have had a easy life in the past.
There time is limited though and I would guess we could see a few of these retiring by the end of this year/start of next.
They were brought in to replace the Marshall darts as these vehicles had lower millage but they are being hammered in Glasgow now and it's started to show. An order for a few 9.7m e200mmcs would be great to see for the smaller routes.I did think caetano buses were a rather odd move. While Lanarkshire is having stock pumped into their local services - they brought 52 plate buses up from down South. Scotstoun has some too. I think while they’re focusing on their smaller (sometimes forgotten) services they should really see what buses would be suitable for these routes. The 81 is a perfect example along with the 206. I don’t think they really know which buses to use on these routes hence why we see a mixture of all kinds of buses. This route has had darts, solos, deckers, new singles. The 46 is a route which sees older deckers, B7Ls and probably soon will revert to B7RLEs once the tridents and toiletboxes go. That’s something I think they have to address. Bringing in buses as old as the ones they are replacing to me makes no sense. Plus money was spent to paint these new buses into the urban livery.
They were brought in to replace the Marshall darts as these vehicles had lower millage but they are being hammered in Glasgow now and it's started to show. An order for a few 9.7m e200mmcs would be great to see for the smaller routes.
the other B10BLE that left Blantyre is 61597 to replace Dumbarton's 62177 which is now awaiting it's fate.
33120 withdrawn
Which is why I say branding a bus for a particular is just wrongthere is enough for the full 75 but as Scott said it will be off the road for something. Unfortunately there will be days branded vehicles will be off the road for work etc.
I did think caetano buses were a rather odd move. While Lanarkshire is having stock pumped into their local services - they brought 52 plate buses up from down South. Scotstoun has some too. I think while they’re focusing on their smaller (sometimes forgotten) services they should really see what buses would be suitable for these routes. The 81 is a perfect example along with the 206. I don’t think they really know which buses to use on these routes hence why we see a mixture of all kinds of buses. This route has had darts, solos, deckers, new singles. The 46 is a route which sees older deckers, B7Ls and probably soon will revert to B7RLEs once the tridents and toiletboxes go. That’s something I think they have to address. Bringing in buses as old as the ones they are replacing to me makes no sense. Plus money was spent to paint these new buses into the urban livery.
They were brought in to replace the Marshall darts as these vehicles had lower millage but they are being hammered in Glasgow now and it's started to show. An order for a few 9.7m e200mmcs would be great to see for the smaller routes.
I think it's fair to say the Caetano's have just been brought in as a "Stock gap". I doubt the intention is to keep them for long and no doubt they'll be replaced within the next year or so.
8.9M E200MMCs would be the modern equivalent, however i'd say unless there's clearance issues on the routes then 9.7M examples would be the better option as it gives you 4 extra step free seats.
Most of the caetano darts are in pretty good condition.I thought this had been questioned (and answered) when they originally moved up.
Whilst the Caetano Darts are 52 plates, for the first ten years of their life, they were relatively lightly used by Connex in Jersey - a place of limited road speed and size so they weren't thrashed or running up huge mileages. Hence they were an attractive buy for First from Ensign.
Even in their time with First, they have been used to pootling around Great Yarmouth, Clacton and bits of Hereford/Worcs before a bit more work in Cornwall so, in terms of condition, they might be a 52 plate on the front but they're nearer to a 54/55 plate. That's still getting on for a Dart so it's doubtless accurate that these are a stop gap to help get rid of the Marshall Darts that will have had life of being continually thrashed in London and Glasgow.
All marshal or caetanos could potentially run ok, but theres no escaping the fact they’ve stood on there wheels for 17 years old, from a passenger point of view thats what you get.
Given that most short WB darts are used mainly on supported/poorly performing routes where the blue rinser and concession groups gather, I can see your point.Not really, buses at that age can vary quite significantly, it all depends on the life they've had. Most passengers couldn't tell a 5 year old bus apart from a 15 year old bus, it's just a bus to them and they only care about it if something goes wrong or significantly stands out.
Not really, buses at that age can vary quite significantly, it all depends on the life they've had. Most passengers couldn't tell a 5 year old bus apart from a 15 year old bus, it's just a bus to them and they only care about it if something goes wrong or significantly stands out.
I generally find most truly have a rather negative outlook on bus transport, as I’ve said before almost as if “bus” is a dirty word.Indeed and with a number now getting dateless plates, passengers will know they're not getting a new bus but not know if it's 17 year old one.
Caley depot isnt bet for views. Cathcart road is your best and probobly only option
Never thought i would see the day avondale buses running buses 4 year younger than first glasgow on drumchape/clydebank and duntocher/clydebank
some are some are not all buses pass the same MOT.The First vehicles are in far better condition though, some of Avondale's fleet are in a shocking state.
A bit off topic, but sort of in keeping, is Avondale the last small independent" operator in the Glasgow area (excluding Lanarkshire) not operating as part of a larger group (Citybus - WCM) or just on SPT contracts (Garelochead - 100). I remeber the 90's with all the small operators mostly bread van minibuses.The First vehicles are in far better condition though, some of Avondale's fleet are in a shocking state.
New airport bus was in service for a bit today