37153 is actually in Bridgwater Volvo. Seen there today.
That might explain why one of the E400 open top conversions stopped off at the First depot in the town.
37153 is actually in Bridgwater Volvo. Seen there today.
Won't make much of a difference, just a different bus and operator, will even be the same colour
Has been the same under TfC as it was with Kernow, same time and number of people generally and that won't change again
Absolutely.The only difference will be the actual customers who’ve been left out of pocket by refusing Valid First Kernow tickets in the evening, or TfC selling return tickets on the early morning one knowing they don’t offer a return journey until the evening.
As per page 3 of the TfC timetable they should accept Kernow tickets where Kernow are the main operator but Kernow Don’t accept TfC tickets
I’m pretty sure you aren’t the only one. With TfC failing to stick to the contract on ticket acceptance and even worded in their own timetable book I imagine it will be stopping people travelling outwards during the day if they are unsure on being accepted to get home In the evening.Absolutely.
Means I will probably start catching the bus again to Redruth rather than driving if I can now get back.
Not a problem I've encountered, all the drivers have accepted mine and I've been catching late night T1s five or six times a week no problem, every company is going to have a few staff who don't understand the rulesThe only difference will be the actual customers who’ve been left out of pocket by refusing Valid First Kernow tickets in the evening, or TfC selling return tickets on the early morning one knowing they don’t offer a return journey until the evening.
As per page 3 of the TfC timetable they should accept Kernow tickets where Kernow are the main operator but Kernow Don’t accept TfC tickets
Why would they? Without TfC wants to agree a rate for their acceptance it's not in Kernow's intrest, especially as (going by TfC publicity) Kernow buses don't even exist.The real problem isn't some TfC drivers not accepting Kernow tickets, which even if it does happen you have evidence that it is allowed, but Kernow not accepting TfC tickets at all, that's the issue people should be focussing on and needs to be addressed
While these tot-for-tat spats between the operators continue it's the public that suffers.Why would they? Without TfC wants to agree a rate for their acceptance it's not in Kernow's intrest, especially as (going by TfC publicity) Kernow buses don't even exist.
In reality there's only one group that's in the room; the council themselves.While these tot-for-tat spats between the operators continue it's the public that suffers.
I'd lock representatives from the council, GSW and FK in a room together and not let them out until they've agreed on integrated timetable publicity, mutual return ticket acceptance and all-bus day and period ticketing. This is all basic stuff!
That's not enough.In reality there's only one group that's in the room; the council themselves.
They specify the publicity, they control the bus stops, they specify and control the contracted network. All they have to do (if they want to) is agree a rate of reimbursement for FK to accept other TfC tickets. It's all within their power (as they had the extended powers under the buses legislation and they have the extra money.
GSW just have to make sure their drivers understand ticket acceptance, I suspect they can move on to that now as they appear to have the issues from the early days more under control (vehicle damage, fuel etc).
Not a problem I've encountered, all the drivers have accepted mine and I've been catching late night T1s five or six times a week no problem, every company is going to have a few staff who don't understand the rules
That's not enough.
FK operate the commercial network, which CC has no control over so need to be party to any agreement. You can't have an all-bus period ticket without FK's agreement, nor inclusion of TfC journeys on FK's timetables. The agreements also need to be applicable to any future GSW commercial services.
So, all parties need to be in agreement.
Kernow is a commercial operator and unless the council or Go Ahead agree a compensation package with FK it will never happen. I’ve had it on good authority neither of those organisations have made any form of contact with FK to discuss the matter.The real problem isn't some TfC drivers not accepting Kernow tickets, which even if it does happen you have evidence that it is allowed, but Kernow not accepting TfC tickets at all, that's the issue people should be focussing on and needs to be addressed
Kernow is mentioned in the TfC book but just a sentence saying 'Additional services are operated by First Kernow, please see their timetable for more information' on Kernow's daytime commercial servicesWhy would they? Without TfC wants to agree a rate for their acceptance it's not in Kernow's intrest, especially as (going by TfC publicity) Kernow buses don't even exist.
But that's no reason for Kernow not to approach them, but as you say unless it makes financial sense to Kernow it won't happen as it makes no difference to themKernow is a commercial operator and unless the council or Go Ahead agree a compensation package with FK it will never happen. I’ve had it on good authority neither of those organisations have made any form of contact with FK to discuss the matter.
But that's no reason for Kernow not to approach them, but as you say unless it makes financial sense to Kernow it won't happen as it makes no difference to them
Just the northern section of the 87 affected at the moment isn't it, from Holywell Bay onwards can't think of any other parts of routes operated by TfC in the daytime and Kernow in the evening
This bloke has been inconvenienced. He'll probably travel by bus less as a result. That's FK's loss as well as TfC's.Why would first make contact on something that is of very little benefit to themselves? It is a matter for CC/PCB to initiate.
Where the first 27 is run by TfC they keep selling return tickets That have no use until late evening. Encountered a chap the other afternoon in Roche returning to Bodmin, he’d been sold a return on the sole morning run from Bodmin. I said sorry not valid, he asked when the next TfC to Bodmin and I looked up for him and it was about 2100 from Roche to Bodmin.
Both the pz bound buses are considerably late. Possibly the next service from pz took a spare bus instead of running late53801, 53826 and 53704 are all on the M6 at the moment. Anyone know why there is three buses on the M6 when FK only require 2 buses to operate the every 30 min service?
Also 32554 is on the A1.
I can quite believe that given the ineptitude of the council so far.Kernow is a commercial operator and unless the council or Go Ahead agree a compensation package with FK it will never happen. I’ve had it on good authority neither of those organisations have made any form of contact with FK to discuss the matter.
They don't even need the extended powers. This has all been standard practice at some local authorities for years. It's basic stuff.They specify the publicity, they control the bus stops, they specify and control the contracted network. All they have to do (if they want to) is agree a rate of reimbursement for FK to accept other TfC tickets. It's all within their power (as they had the extended powers under the buses legislation and they have the extra money.
It appears Mousehole is flooded. Buses turning at Roskilly.Both the pz bound buses are considerably late. Possibly the next service from pz took a spare bus instead of running late
To help out their customers and to put people before profit maybe for once?Why would first make contact on something that is of very little benefit to themselves? It is a matter for CC/PCB to initiate.
Where the first 27 is run by TfC they keep selling return tickets That have no use until late evening. Encountered a chap the other afternoon in Roche returning to Bodmin, he’d been sold a return on the sole morning run from Bodmin. I said sorry not valid, he asked when the next TfC to Bodmin and I looked up for him and it was about 2100 from Roche to Bodmin.
Are you aware the main purpose of a business is to generate profit for shareholders?To help out their customers and to put people before profit maybe for once?
And you do know who I work for, that will probably answer your questionAre you aware the main purpose of a business is to generate profit for shareholders?
Was that expected?66847 ex South Yorkshire is currently in Camborne.
Earlier this week it was quoted on the South Yorkshire Transport Forum that 66847 was leaving Doncaster for Worcester as a swap for 66820.Was that expected?
Was that expected?
Earlier this week it was quoted on the South Yorkshire Transport Forum that 66847 was leaving Doncaster for Worcester as a swap for 66820.
Took a wrong turning???!!!
Think I may have an answer (of sorts) to that - driving up past Jack Daniels Estate at about 1 p.m. passed an oos M6 Solo that had been Pz bound with passengers on pavement and driver standing in front of bus on mobile: no obvious signs of an accident so either breakdown or passenger incident, I'd imagine. Next bus would probably have been a 5 - interesting to see if passengers picked up for free (at least one wasn't elderly).53801, 53826 and 53704 are all on the M6 at the moment. Anyone know why there is three buses on the M6 when FK only require 2 buses to operate the every 30 min service?
Also 32554 is on the A1.
Earlier this week it was quoted on the South Yorkshire Transport Forum that 66847 was leaving Doncaster for Worcester as a swap for 66820.
Took a wrong turning???!!!
The SY Forum said it was to do with the liveries.66820 was due to Cornwall after engine work in Worcester. It was swapped with 66847, presumably because 820 is fuschia fronted and wouldn’t need paint for ‘Doncaster’s Clever Buses’.