Granted, I thought it had started earlier than this weekend.Im not saying it isn’t true but it’s hardly a fair sample - it’s only been running two days, and I’m pretty poor weather
Yes how disappointing. No publicity and promo, no easy to find timetables (just buried on the website like a standard bus), no branded buses drawing awareness or intrigue. Plus no open tops which are also a draw and a poor timetable and it's hardly a surprise
The 11 (Portland Coaster) in Weymouth feels similar. Anonymous vehicles without branding, no branded timetables just a standard looking timetable, no printed timetable books and no promo online. A couple of years back there were printed guides at the train stations, shops, TICs and even advertising on local radio and social media. Hope loadings pick up and we don't hear they are being withdrawn due to poor usage. Plus there's the new 55 round Lulworth, Monkey World and Tank Museum. Virtually no publicity of this and no clear links on X54 timetable showing the link is possible - like they expect people to just turn up.
I note the Exmoor Explorer (or Explore Exmoor as all but the first Ilfracombe bound timetable calls it) neater PDF file doesn’t promote the dates that open-toppers will run, so while it’s undoubtedly better presented I feel it still lacks a key bit of info and seems to be confused about what the route is called.Nicer looking timetables for Somerset are on this page
Your bus times in Somerset
Routes Service 1/1E - Taunton town centre to & from Wellsprings | Priorswood Service 4 - Taunton town centre to & from Wheatley Crescent | Lane Estatewww.firstbus.co.uk
It does seem to be a bit odd - the nicer looking timetable being available from the same website as the cheap looking ones. And if you type the route into Google, the latter is the one that comes up first.I note the Exmoor Explorer (or Explore Exmoor as all but the first Ilfracombe bound timetable calls it) neater PDF file doesn’t promote the dates that open-toppers will run, so while it’s undoubtedly better presented I feel it still lacks a key bit of info and seems to be confused about what the route is called.
Source: https://www.firstbus.co.uk/sites/default/files/public/node_images/somerset network tt web mar25 explore exmoor.pdf
I presume the basic ones are computer generated are the same across the whole company are automatically appear in the timetable sectionIt does seem to be a bit odd - the nicer looking timetable being available from the same website as the cheap looking ones. And if you type the route into Google, the latter is the one that comes up first.
Well it's good to see that leaflet! Gives hope the concept isn't completely dead!I presume the basic ones are computer generated are the same across the whole company are automatically appear in the timetable section
Some subsidiaries then produce their own nicer ones on a separate page
== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==
There is also a full leaflet, a slightly rebranded version of last years which may or may not be appearing in print
Deleted as it was the wrong threadAnyone observed the operation of the replacement service for St Ives - Lands End open top route this weekend ?
Exactly.This strange concept of ‘running it into the ground’ again that gets used a lot round here but makes no business sense
Why would a company make their business worse? What they are doing is probably because they think it will make their business, at least the financial numbers, better
Why omit the actual timetable from the leaflet (probably the most important part along with its included route map) & doesn't the leaflet wrongly imply that the Ilfracombe - Lynmouth section is only served for five weeks in the peak Summer when the open-top buses operate?I presume the basic ones are computer generated are the same across the whole company are automatically appear in the timetable section
Some subsidiaries then produce their own nicer ones on a separate page
== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==
There is also a full leaflet, a slightly rebranded version of last years which may or may not be appearing in print
Indeed - that is fair comment/observation. Not the first time they've done that IIRC with a QR code to scan - I think last year was similar. The other bit is clearly an error.Why omit the actual timetable from the leaflet (probably the most important part along with its included route map) & doesn't the leaflet wrongly imply that the Ilfracombe - Lynmouth section is only served for five weeks in the peak Summer when the open-top buses operate?
It was indeed the same last year on all the Coaster routes. Roger French's view at the time was it was totally bonkers and I have to agree.Indeed - that is fair comment/observation. Not the first time they've done that IIRC with a QR code to scan - I think last year was similar.
I don't think they are deliberately doing that but as seen elsewhere in Firstbus, the old view of reducing cost no matter the impact on customers is back. See West Yorkshire where a service was reduced from every 30 to every 35 minutes (well the AI timetable version of every 35 minutes) to avoid extra resources being committed on a route that was once every 15 minutes.This strange concept of ‘running it into the ground’ again that gets used a lot round here but makes no business sense
Why would a company make their business worse? What they are doing is probably because they think it will make their business, at least the financial numbers, better
It's my view as well. I can understand not printing timetables for local routes in Bristol, but where you have a clearly tourist orientated product and you're producing a promo leaflet, it makes no sense.It was indeed the same last year on all the Coaster routes. Roger French's view at the time was it was totally bonkers and I have to agree.
Yes thank you. Sorry I think my original post may have been worded badly. I never meant they were deliberately running the ops into the ground but merely managers not locally making decisions that is effectively running it into the ground and from that unless something major changes, dare I say it but managers in Cornwall making network decisions for the local network without interference from those in Hampshire whom know nothing of Cornwall ops I can only see one end I am afraidI don't think they are deliberately doing that but as seen elsewhere in Firstbus, the old view of reducing cost no matter the impact on customers is back. See West Yorkshire where a service was reduced from every 30 to every 35 minutes (well the AI timetable version of every 35 minutes) to avoid extra resources being committed on a route that was once every 15 minutes.
There have been a few other instances where it would have been better for the local authorities if First had withdrawn a route but instead the frequency was cut during the day and journeys withdrawn at the margins
Being too remote was something that many predicted when First introduced its regional management structure.Yes thank you. Sorry I think my original post may have been worded badly. I never meant they were deliberately running the ops into the ground but merely managers not locally making decisions that is effectively running it into the ground and from that unless something major changes, dare I say it but managers in Cornwall making network decisions for the local network without interference from those in Hampshire whom know nothing of Cornwall ops I can only see one end I am afraid
As others have mentioned previously, it is not all that long until the Cornwall wide contract held by Plymouth Citybus is put out for retender. I would imagine that ideally First will want to remain in the county for the next couple of years and win the contract. I do not know how long the college contracts are for, but presumably Stagecoach in being successful will be looking to build on these contracts by winning the contract for the local bus routes thus achieving some integration much as Go have with the Callywith work.It is, I think, obvious that First have been loosing money in Cornwall. Stagecoach will have noticed and I would not be surprised if their bids for the college contracts were priced as 'at cost', with no profit, as a hope to break into Cornwall and be prepared for what might become available. Go-Ahead are good at picking up or taking a route here and there and the network slowly expands until it forces a much bigger piece to come their way. Go South Coast and Oxford have several examples along with adding small companies when retirement sales make them available.
It was never offered as a single contract for the local bus services. Multiple lots, most of which were single routes were offered. PCB won by submitting a package bid for the whole lot which was more economically advantageous than any other combination of bids received. It was a very high risk strategy as submitting a package bid barred PCB from also submitting any individual bids. If PCB had not won anything new they would also have lost all their work in SE Cornwall.As others have mentioned previously, it is not all that long until the Cornwall wide contract held by Plymouth Citybus is put out for retender. I would imagine that ideally First will want to remain in the county for the next couple of years and win the contract. I do not know how long the college contracts are for, but presumably Stagecoach in being successful will be looking to build on these contracts by winning the contract for the local bus routes thus achieving some integration much as Go have with the Callywith work.
Spot on.It was never offered as a single contract for the local bus services. Multiple lots, most of which were single routes were offered. PCB won by submitting a package bid for the whole lot which was more economically advantageous than any other combination of bids received. It was a very high risk strategy as submitting a package bid barred PCB from also submitting any individual bids. If PCB had not won anything new they would also have lost all their work in SE Cornwall.
Next time it is just as likely that there will be multiple successful operators. That will be a test of keeping the TfC enhanced partnership running smoothly.
Given the quality of buses First run on College contracts, it's interesting that they were best in quality. Particularly given Go Cornwall generally run much newer vehicles...albeit stuck together with gaffer tape still! The only thing First do better is friendliness of drivers. From the moment Mark Morgan-Huws was forced out, the writing has been on the wall sadly.Spot on.
IIRC, Stagecoach only submitted bids for North and East Cornwall, whilst First only submitted bids for lots in their existing areas (so not NE or SE Cornwall). It was only Go Ahead that submitted a single all-encompassing bid for everything.
I guess that First will be thinking that they can sharpen their pencil. Again, and apologise as it was 6 years ago so the memory is jaded, but I think that First actually were cheaper on those lots that they submitted against but lost out on the quality assessment. Fast forward to now and their Cornwall College work was lost on price despite them being best on the quality assessment.
Quality is not quality in that respect. Quality assessment in a public procurement sense is about answering a set of questions that relate to various criteria against which you are scored e.g. explain how you train and assess your drivers, or how you engage with local communities, may be part of the quality criteria.Given the quality of buses First run on College contracts, it's interesting that they were best in quality. Particularly given Go Cornwall generally run much newer vehicles...albeit stuck together with gaffer tape still! The only thing First do better is friendliness of drivers. From the moment Mark Morgan-Huws was forced out, the writing has been on the wall sadly.