Also a "fail" on the part of the under-employed non-commercial guard in failing to spot and correct it. Then again on 8-car workings they're normally based in a middle cab and may not ever see the cab ends of their train!It's not correct, but the driver probably just forgot to switch them over when changing ends. These things happen.
Only on certain newer trains, plenty are fully manual head/tail lights.I see, I was thinking surely they automatically change to rear lights when the train travels in the other direction
Why exactly would the guard be checking if the reds are on or not? Yeah it's a simple process to change it, but guards are neither responsible nor trained to check the rear cab lights are correct.Also a "fail" on the part of the under-employed non-commercial guard in failing to spot and correct it. Then again on 8-car workings they're normally based in a middle cab and may not ever see the cab ends of their train!
Why exactly would the guard be checking if the reds are on or not? Yeah it's a simple process to change it, but guards are neither responsible nor trained to check the rear cab lights are correct.
Plenty of commercial guards also work the 455s...Also a "fail" on the part of the under-employed non-commercial guard in failing to spot and correct it. Then again on 8-car workings they're normally based in a middle cab and may not ever see the cab ends of their train!
There are scenarios where it is white on the back and white on the front (wrong direction movement to assist a failed train), or red on the front and white on the back (wrong direction movement less than 400m). Guards won't have been trained in these, so best they leave the lights alone, or just let the driver know.It might not be technically part of their job, but you hardly need any training to know that it's white on the front and red on the back (it's only the same as every other vehicle in the world, road or rail), so a guard being helpful might just spot it anyway, if only because they absolutely should (if anywhere near the end) have a nose to see if the back display is showing the correct destination!
There are scenarios where it is white on the back and white on the front (wrong direction movement to assist a failed train), or red on the front and white on the back (wrong direction movement less than 400m). Guards won't have been trained in these, so best they leave the lights alone, or just let the driver know.
I see, I was thinking surely they automatically change to rear lights when the train travels in the other direction
Which trains do this automatically? There used to be circumstances when a red should be displayed on the front (emergency stop for any approaching train), no light at all on the rear (front part of a divided train) or even tail plus marker lights (shunting). But do these still apply?Only on certain newer trains, plenty are fully manual head/tail lights.
I believe newer units have the lights controlled from the leading cab, but older ones can only control them from the nearest cab.I had assumed they would tell the driver rather than just change them, yes. But noticing something wrong and not saying something wouldn't be the right approach regardless of whether it was technically their job or not.
That's not correct. The rulebook states that the driver and guard are both responsible for checking that there is a red tail light displayed on the rear of the train. TW1/14.2:Why exactly would the guard be checking if the reds are on or not? Yeah it's a simple process to change it, but guards are neither responsible nor trained to check the rear cab lights are correct.
The automatic setting tends to be that red lights are shown when the driver keys off. But the lights can still be set manually using the switch to override the auto setting (except on 80x where the only way to set headlights on the end of the train where the cab isn't active is to crawl around on the floor and open a cover to access an emergency headlights switch). So you can still set lights as required by the rule book for emergencies, divided trains etc.Which trains do this automatically? There used to be circumstances when a red should be displayed on the front (emergency stop for any approaching train), no light at all on the rear (front part of a divided train) or even tail plus marker lights (shunting). But do these still apply?
I believe newer units have the lights controlled from the leading cab, but older ones can only control them from the nearest cab.
I've seen that too, but only when it's running into the platform and there's no chance of it being misinterpreted.I have however seen a train's lights switch from white to red before it came to a stand on arival at a terminus
I've seen that too, but only when it's running into the platform and there's no chance of it being misinterpreted.
Which trains do this automatically?
On 222s you can switch the tail lights on at the rear from the leading cab.I don't know of any units that allow the lights at the rear to be controlled from the leading cab
It can be correct. If the buffer stops have a certain marking, that denotes that headlights must be displayed instead of tail lights to prevent confusion between red tail lights and red signals. Waterloo South Sidings is one such place.It's not correct, but the driver probably just forgot to switch them over when changing ends. These things happen.