Deepgreen
Established Member
Assuming ASDO can be made to work in time, otherwise I imagine they'll be sent to rot anyway.Ah thats a shame. I assume the new date will be put on here when its found out? Then after that all to Long Marston?
Assuming ASDO can be made to work in time, otherwise I imagine they'll be sent to rot anyway.Ah thats a shame. I assume the new date will be put on here when its found out? Then after that all to Long Marston?
That and the fact the unit is detached at WestburyThis is normally in relation to Castle Cary platform 3, which can only accommodate 3 coaches and is routine on Weymouth's 1111 departure.
My only experience is weekend after Glastonbury both units went to Bristol ParkwayThat and the fact the unit is detached at Westbury
That and the fact the unit is detached at Westbury
I can't quote for previous timetables, but due to stay together throughout in the Dec 22 WTT. The rear two coaches are then unlocked at Westbury for use.My only experience is weekend after Glastonbury both units went to Bristol Parkway
ASDO or not Avoncliff and Dilton Marsh will ever be one set of doors unless the platforms are extended.The other issue with multiple Turbo formations in GWR's central & west regions is local door operation, which occurs at a number of locations between Bath & Weymouth/Warminster and quite a few places on the westcountry branchlines. This requires the opening of just a single set of doors, usually the set at the front of the train, and of course means that anyone in the rear set has no means of alighting (save for operating an egress!).
So one unit will be 'dead' (in tow)? Does a single 769 have the power/tractive effort to achieve that?All 13x 769s at Long Marston will be required to rotate through Reading TCD for various inspections prior to handback. Expect to see paths between Reading and Long Marston appearing in the system in the near future.
First move is slated for 14/02 - 1x769 to LM to return to RG with another (769940?) in tow.
So one unit will be 'dead' (in tow)? Does a single 769 have the power/tractive effort to achieve that?
Right - sorry, I wasn't being pedantic, I just thought I'd missed something about the moves.No I think it’s just as an expression rather than literal tow.
Now cancelled due to the line being blocked by the bridge collapse at Yarnton.All 13x 769s at Long Marston will be required to rotate through Reading TCD for various inspections prior to handback. Expect to see paths between Reading and Long Marston appearing in the system in the near future.
First move is slated for 14/02 - 1x769 to LM to return to RG with another (769940?) in tow.
I was out yesterday and can confirm that these units were at the following locations:
Oxford up cs
769943 - with one driving vehicle tagged.
769938
Reading depot
769959
Plus at least one more 769 at the West end.
If anyone knows the identity of the other Reading unit it'd be much appreciated.
Thanks very much for that info @FGW_DID. Yes 959 was on it's own at the time and I did wonder if the other (s) were the ones which had been at Oxford until recently.769930 & 769949 are together on the west siding furthest from the mainline.
769959 is with 769935 on another road. If 959 was by itself when you passed, 935 was in the shed for its hand back inspection.
Now planned for Weds 22nd with 935 going to Long Marston to attach to 940 for the return to Reading. Moves for the rest of the units at LM possibly to be loco hauled, but still being decided.First move is slated for 14/02 - 1x769 to LM to return to RG with another (769940?) in tow.
I dont suppose you know if this is definitely happening for tomorrow? If so are there any rough times? May pop down if it isn't too earlyNow planned for Weds 22nd with 935 going to Long Marston to attach to 940 for the return to Reading. Moves for the rest of the units at LM possibly to be loco hauled, but still being decided.
Are there any pathings already for this tomorrow? Just thinking if I can make it without getting up too earlyNot too sure about any Long Marston move but there should be a 2 for 2 swap between RG and Oxford.
Are there any pathings already for this tomorrow? Just thinking if I can make it without getting up too early
Ah right ok. I am guessing a VSTP pathing then if it runs?Nothing as of yet.
Yes, they will be VSTP.Ah right ok. I am guessing a VSTP pathing then if it runs?
I saw there was a VSTP 3Z40 from Oxford Up Carriage Sidings last Wednesday, was that a 769? If so is that likely to be the same path for the 22nd?Yes, they will be VSTP.
No, not happening now.I dont suppose you know if this is definitely happening for tomorrow? If so are there any rough times? May pop down if it isn't too early
Not happening now. The focus of the 769 project is on handing back the units to Porterbrook. The focus of the ASDO project has switched back to 16x, for which testing is in the process of being planned.Has any progress been made with the ASDO system for testing or has that now also been dumped?
Thanks. Presumably that will involve at least two units at a time, which I would have thought can be ill-afforded with the current stock situation. Are the 769s so poor that they can't even be used for that to save units for service?No, not happening now.
Not happening now. The focus of the 769 project is on handing back the units to Porterbrook. The focus of the ASDO project has switched back to 16x, for which testing is in the process of being planned.
I would imagine the end of the financial year looming means the handbacks have to be done damn quick in railway termsThanks. Presumably that will involve at least two units at a time, which I would have thought can be ill-afforded with the current stock situation. Are the 769s so poor that they can't even be used for that to save units for service?
Probably so - such is the artificially-constrained nature of stock leasing; under a nationalised/public body this constraint needn't apply.I would imagine the end of the financial year looming means the handbacks have to be done damn quick in railway terms
Pretty sure accounting and financial years exist in the public sector!Probably so - such is the artificially-constrained nature of stock leasing; under a nationalised/public body this constraint needn't apply.