Wilts Wanderer
Established Member
- Joined
- 21 Nov 2016
- Messages
- 2,955
And once again I never said I was bothered one way or another about all trains being faster services.
The faster times you point out could equally be achieved by HST`s. Nothing to do with faster trains which I admitted the 802`s are on acceleration. As for old timetables via Bristol that is irrelevant.
I was expecting a decent Royal Duchy and Cornish Riviera service which we don`t have anymore. Those reductions you mention are simply just GWR moving goalposts.
The limited stop nature of the Cornish Riviera and other West of England named trains has long been a function of passenger loadings rather than a desire to operate a super fast train between London and Cornwall. If the Up train is predicted to be full after Exeter then there is no point in calling at Tiverton, Taunton, etc. as it will just result in an overcrowded train. The larger capacity of the new trains means that the regular hourly fast Plymouth’s have sufficient capacity for the more popular intermediate calls (Ie Taunton, Tiverton, Newton Abbot and Totnes.) You may find in 10 years, if trains are much busier, that the key leisure trains become limited stop again. Again, this will be a simple function of supply vs demand.
Also - the choice of which train to name is generally made by a Marketing dept who will be looking for a journey time they can headline. This is why names generally disappear with new timetables, although interestingly GWR are (I believe) continuing to market the traditional names, as part of the brand.