• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Highland Council approves plan to take 9000 tonnes of timber off Caithness roads and on to rail network

Status
Not open for further replies.

och aye

Member
Joined
21 Jan 2012
Messages
804
Some more positive news for rail freight.


A PLAN to take 9000 tonnes of timber off Caithness roads and on to the rail network has been approved by Highland Council.

It granted planning permission to Caledonia Forest Land Investment Ltd to construct a rail-side timber loading facility on land near Altnabreac station. The company, which has a number of plantations in the north, is working on the venture with HiTrans and Scottish Woodlands.

The facility will be initially operated on a trial basis but, if successful, could be extended and be a model for similar ventures across Scotland, it was stated.

A report which was before councillors said the loading bay will facilitate the haulage of timber by rail from Caithness to Inverness, taking an estimated 400 lorries off the roads. 25 rail trips instead.

"Altnabreac offers one of the best sites in Scotland for rail-side loading and the concept meets the Scottish Government's strategies for moving haulage from road to rail. This follows the successful trial in 2020 funded by Transport Scotland to run a regular timber service from Georgemas Station to Inverness. If this demonstration proves successful it is proposed to extend the facility which will then be subject to a further planning application as appropriate."

The report stated: "Specialist low ground pressure haulage vehicles will transfer the timber from the forest to the facility where it will be stacked adjacent to the rail line and uplifted using a dedicated loader on to specialist rail wagons.

"The loading of timber will take place while the train occupies the rail line and loading times will be timed to suit other rail services and determined by the specialist train provider. At this time, it is anticipated that up to three trains a week will operate within a 24 hour /7 day window."

It added: "For this demonstration project it is proposed that approximately 9000 tonnes of timber will be transferred by rail to Inverness with the exact timing and duration to be determined by the rail provider and the forest owner. The existing route for the site is the unclassified road between Strathmore and Westerdale and then the B870 to Spittal before joining the A9. This route has significant structural issues and moving the timber haulage to rail will bring significant benefits for the Highland Council as roads authority and other road users."

The application was supported by the Highland Timber Transport Group (HTTG) which said:"One of the major problems with timber-by-rail is the cost of road haulage from forest to rail and then rail to mill. Few Scottish mills are currently rail connected so the mill-end road journey cannot usually be eliminated. However, at Altnabreac, the rail-side loading facility is in the heart of a large forest, eliminating the need for public road haulage and utilising in-forest vehicles for transfer to the rail side. Apart from mitigating damage to the road network in Caithness this arrangement provides the best opportunity to establish if the the economics of timber-by-rail can be made viable and sustainable in Scotland."

In a statement before the councillors, HTTG, said: "Over the last 20 years, we have worked with the private sector and a range of supportive public bodies to see if timber-by-rail can be made to work in the Highlands. The Altnabreac Demonstrator Project could prove to be the culmination of this work and has the potential to inform mode transfer to rail opportunities across Scotland. Although the current proposal is limited in scale the strategic significance of what is proposed should not be lost."
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

backontrack

Established Member
Joined
2 Feb 2014
Messages
6,383
Location
The UK
Wonderful news! We've been hoping for this for a long time, so it's a significant, excellent development.

Hopefully, the new Altnabreac siding plan includes a passing loop.
 
Last edited:

Dr Hoo

Established Member
Joined
10 Nov 2015
Messages
3,976
Location
Hope Valley
Wonderful news! We've been hoping for this for a long time, so it's a significant, excellent development.

Hopefully, the new Altnabreac siding plan includes a passing loop.
My reading was that this was about ‘lineside loading’. It would be quite a stretch to go for a siding (let alone a loop) for a 9,000 tonne campaign/trial.
 

oldman

Member
Joined
26 Nov 2013
Messages
1,027
This Hitrans document (September 2021) gives some details

Project detail
Lineside loading to rail c.400 tonnes/train- 22 trains of ten wagons, 2 trains/week to permit replenishing of stacks in quarry, but possibly alternate 3 trains a week: 2300-
0500 under possession.
Material currently available: c. 9000 tonnes largely 3m/3.1m chip, up to 30% sawlogs 3.7m/4.9m. Also, some 1.7m posts, 1.9m slats.
Destination is likely Inverness for Norbord, possibly sawlogs to Mosstodloch.

Infrastructure/earthworks
South end of loader roadway requires building up to rail height to create 7m roadway c90m long at 3m from rail edge. Double stacking area to be created on forest side of
roadway. Access road to quarry requires widening/regrading to ease the steep slope.
NB phone cable to level crossing phone requires to be moved to the other side of the track and troughed or buried to remove tripping hazard. Walking route for strapping on offside to be ensured 2m from rail off ballast shoulder.
Current timber is on the north side of the railway, meaning direct access to the loading area without crossing the railway line.
 

Domeyhead

Member
Joined
10 Nov 2009
Messages
386
Location
The South
This is good news. I am not sure in what way the Georgemas trial could be deemed successful, as the news article infers. Georgemas demonstrated to interested parties that it was too labour and capital intensive to be viable as an operation, due in part to the need to load and unload from road lorries, unsuitable rolling stock and the relative remoteness of the source timber. Even local politicians commented on the number of "hard hats" stood around idly for much of the loading operation. The only way to bring timber out of the highlands by rail is to use lineside loading direct from forestry tracks as this is doing, and I assume, to top and tail the motive power to save time consuming run arounds. I hope this model leads to exploration of further sites on the West Highland line, and to new markets in addition to Altnabreac.
 

class26

Member
Joined
4 May 2011
Messages
1,126
Isn`t this already being done at Kinbrace on the main line after the last passenger train has departed ?
 

mpthomson

Member
Joined
18 Feb 2016
Messages
971
Wonderful news! We've been hoping for this for a long time, so it's a significant, excellent development.

Hopefully, the new Altnabreac siding plan includes a passing loop.
There'll be no line laid for a relatively small scheme like this.
 

InOban

Established Member
Joined
12 Mar 2017
Messages
4,221
By its very nature, timber harvesting is local. Once one site is cleared they may move some distance to the next area.
 

backontrack

Established Member
Joined
2 Feb 2014
Messages
6,383
Location
The UK
If the FNL is going to get a passing loop I'd suggest that Evanton would be more useful than Altnabreac.
Lentran would be the most useful! (Now in planning stages I think.)

Any passing loop would be a boon though, even if Altnabreac is a bit close to Forsinard. Evanton, or Kinbrace, would be more useful locations, I agree. If there are going to be timber movements on the line then more paths might need to be accommodated than there are at present.
 

najaB

Veteran Member
Joined
28 Aug 2011
Messages
30,844
Location
Scotland
Lentran would be the most useful! (Now in planning stages I think.)
Oh, without a doubt. But that's a bit more than "just" a passing loop.

The suggestion of Evanton was because it's already an intermediate TEP so maximum benefit with minimum changes required to signalling. Could help with the afternoon services between Tain and Inverness. I used to work up that way regularly and leaving Alness there were two trains heading south about 20 minutes apart before 5pm and then an almost three hour gap to after 7:00pm.

Edit: I may have mis-remembered or the timetable has got worse. Heading south from Alness it's 15:56, 16:16 then 20:12.
 
Last edited:

tbtc

Veteran Member
Joined
16 Dec 2008
Messages
17,882
Location
Reston City Centre
Good news, but if it's just three trains a week for eight weeks then I wouldn't be getting excited about passing loops (e.g. if the plan is to emulate Kinbrace and run after the last passenger service of the day)

Looking at today's paths there's a Q code path from Georgemas down to Inverness around half five, almost an hour after the last passenger service of the day, so potentially fine for a freight train to load up and head south - it's got an eleven minute wait at Lairg to wait for the last northbound passenger service of the day - no need to spend millions on infrastructure for the sake of a couple of dozen trains in total)
 

ChiefPlanner

Established Member
Joined
6 Sep 2011
Messages
7,787
Location
Herts
Good news, but if it's just three trains a week for eight weeks then I wouldn't be getting excited about passing loops (e.g. if the plan is to emulate Kinbrace and run after the last passenger service of the day)

Looking at today's paths there's a Q code path from Georgemas down to Inverness around half five, almost an hour after the last passenger service of the day, so potentially fine for a freight train to load up and head south - it's got an eleven minute wait at Lairg to wait for the last northbound passenger service of the day - no need to spend millions on infrastructure for the sake of a couple of dozen trains in total)

Good to reduce road traffic , etc - but the actual revenue accrued from rail haulage is going to be pretty low , and certainly not enough to pay for bespoke infrastructure like passing loops , or even additional sidings.

I quote the rate for a West Highland line to Workington loaded OTA wagon circa 1989 of £80 , per wagon one way - £120 per wagon for Chirk. Even less for "shorter" flows - too embarrassing to quote.

A reverse Speedlink operation really , as the inwards Scottish flows were just as challenging revenue wise , timber was outwards and return empties , lucky to get a loaded journey a week per wagon.
 

tbtc

Veteran Member
Joined
16 Dec 2008
Messages
17,882
Location
Reston City Centre
Good to reduce road traffic , etc - but the actual revenue accrued from rail haulage is going to be pretty low , and certainly not enough to pay for bespoke infrastructure like passing loops , or even additional sidings.

I quote the rate for a West Highland line to Workington loaded OTA wagon circa 1989 of £80 , per wagon one way - £120 per wagon for Chirk. Even less for "shorter" flows - too embarrassing to quote.

A reverse Speedlink operation really , as the inwards Scottish flows were just as challenging revenue wise , timber was outwards and return empties , lucky to get a loaded journey a week per wagon.

As usual, you bring experience and numbers to a debate - very interesting - especially given how much of the rest of the week the wagons are idle for the sake of a handful of journeys - thanks for sharing
 

ChiefPlanner

Established Member
Joined
6 Sep 2011
Messages
7,787
Location
Herts
As usual, you bring experience and numbers to a debate - very interesting - especially given how much of the rest of the week the wagons are idle for the sake of a handful of journeys - thanks for sharing

Thanks - the present trainload operations from Baglan Bay and Carlisle to Chirk seem to have cracked the market quite well , good loadings on high capacity trains , easy train operations and so on. The timber sources from South Wales "harvest" from a wide range of forests (or soon to be "ex forests") and hauliers no doubt dump the inwards loads to a stockpile , so when the train comes in , there is a guaranteed load. Excellent logistics , rather than "there may be a need for 3 wagons at xxx next Thursday" - there often was not , so the wagons festered for maybe a week till it suited the haulier to bring it in , his vehicles no doubt having trunked easy loads to other locations.

The rates then , were awful. There was constant pressure to convert Speedlink covered vans (redundant due to the inability to match road hauliers who had the markets covered since about 1960) , to timber carriers , (chop the side panels off and fit stanchions and span set rachets) , quick coat of paint , - easily done by places like Cathays and Currock , - but at about £4 a ton gross (not net) , saying no was fairly easy , but did not go down well with senior managers for whom any traffic was worth having (at almost any cost !)

The concept of a salesman , who wanted resources to run timber from Sudbrook to Southampton for a wagon rate of £35 , including an element of a dedicated loco to run from East Usk to the loading point (and hang around there, plus shunter and loading staff) was utterly unviable , at least at Carmarthen there were keen (and underemployed staff) , plus other traffics around to make a better dent at the cost / revenue ratios

You can see how the concept of Speedlnk died. Even in BR days as the realities kicked in. You get the impression in Europe , that remaining timber traffics are now trainload only......

Not that we did not try , but even the foresters often said - unless the haulage rates were rock bottom , the timber was hardly worth moving. By road and rail.

Good luck to any ventures.
 

najaB

Veteran Member
Joined
28 Aug 2011
Messages
30,844
Location
Scotland
Not that we did not try , but even the foresters often said - unless the haulage rates were rock bottom , the timber was hardly worth moving. By road and rail.
I suspect that these days the economics have improved significantly. I was talking with a builder last week and he said that the cost of both board product (plywood / particle board) and timber are through the roof.
 

ChiefPlanner

Established Member
Joined
6 Sep 2011
Messages
7,787
Location
Herts
I suspect that these days the economics have improved significantly. I was talking with a builder last week and he said that the cost of both board product (plywood / particle board) and timber are through the roof.

One"windfall" traffic from the Great Storm of 1988 (?) was the vast quantity and quality of mature hard woods brought down in the South East , shipped out to the Continent on otherwise returning empty flat wagons via the then train ferry operation for furniture making. A one off operation, superbly handled by the staff at Chichester "yard" - yes opportunities arise now and then. (much like the Russians would would send their timber , transhipped at the border to Austria a bit earlier than that date , for chipboard making , to earn some "hard currency" ..the Austrians comments were , better to take their timber , than cut down our own trees. This was the plant at St Johann in Tyrol -who sent Cargowaggons to Blackburn - a detail I found out on a ski holiday , by talking to the local station staff there one evening !....

Maybe the economics may have changed a bit - as I said "good luck" ........
 

Bald Rick

Veteran Member
Joined
28 Sep 2010
Messages
29,221
I suspect that these days the economics have improved significantly. I was talking with a builder last week and he said that the cost of both board product (plywood / particle board) and timber are through the roof.

The value of timber and lumber has indeed increased very significantly in the last two years. However the economics of of shifting it by rail has little to do with the value of what is being carried. The competition is Road, and it is the relative costs / timings of road vs rail that is important.
 

ChiefPlanner

Established Member
Joined
6 Sep 2011
Messages
7,787
Location
Herts
The value of timber and lumber has indeed increased very significantly in the last two years. However the economics of of shifting it by rail has little to do with the value of what is being carried. The competition is Road, and it is the relative costs / timings of road vs rail that is important.

Not much scope then for single wagon loads to Radlett I fear.

(the flow that used to "impress" me was match splints (anyone , remember matches ?) , which were shipped in sealed Dart Line containers from somewhere in Canada to Felixstowe Docks , for (I think) Manchester. Got a serious telling off for not prioritsing them one day when things went wrong , and I put containers of tinned salmon on the train instead. Off topic , but please indulge the old boy......
 

johnnychips

Established Member
Joined
19 Nov 2011
Messages
3,679
Location
Sheffield
Not much scope then for single wagon loads to Radlett I fear.

(the flow that used to "impress" me was match splints (anyone , remember matches ?) , which were shipped in sealed Dart Line containers from somewhere in Canada to Felixstowe Docks , for (I think) Manchester. Got a serious telling off for not prioritsing them one day when things went wrong , and I put containers of tinned salmon on the train instead. Off topic , but please indulge the old boy......
You really need to write a book.
 

Gathursty

Established Member
Joined
31 May 2011
Messages
2,524
Location
Wigan
It will be a pleasant surprise to revisit Altnabreac and find it a hive of activity as opposed to the empty landscape I walked around in.
 

AndrewE

Established Member
Joined
9 Nov 2015
Messages
5,105
The value of timber and lumber has indeed increased very significantly in the last two years. However the economics of of shifting it by rail has little to do with the value of what is being carried. The competition is Road, and it is the relative costs / timings of road vs rail that is important.
I would think that railfreight is getting better able to compete with road every day nowadays - as long as paths and crew are available.
Timings are not important for stuff like logs (except inasmuch as slow journeys cost more in terms of wagon "hire" and crew wages.) We are told that there is a shortage of lorry drivers and that all costs are rising (so including vehicle maintainance and depreciation) all of which will help rail compete.
 

Bald Rick

Veteran Member
Joined
28 Sep 2010
Messages
29,221
We are told that there is a shortage of lorry drivers and that all costs are rising (so including vehicle maintainance and depreciation) all of which will help rail compete.

At the margins, yes.
 

och aye

Member
Joined
21 Jan 2012
Messages
804
I would think that railfreight is getting better able to compete with road every day nowadays - as long as paths and crew are available.
Timings are not important for stuff like logs (except inasmuch as slow journeys cost more in terms of wagon "hire" and crew wages.) We are told that there is a shortage of lorry drivers and that all costs are rising (so including vehicle maintainance and depreciation) all of which will help rail compete.
Hopefully these factors will help speed up upgrades to Highland Main Line.
 

CEN60

Member
Joined
17 Dec 2018
Messages
267
Where does the timber go to? Could the timber eventually go to the proposed freight yard at Norbord (Dalcross) - or is the timber destined for a different market?
 

swt_passenger

Veteran Member
Joined
7 Apr 2010
Messages
31,448
Where does the timber go to? Could the timber eventually go to the proposed freight yard at Norbord (Dalcross) - or is the timber destined for a different market?
“Norbord” is mentioned in the quoted info in post #4
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top