Tazi Hupefi
Member
What evidence do you have that they would be unable to substantiate wrongdoing? Any at all, or are you just making a wild assumption? Have you seen all of the evidence? Can you tell me what all the different systems they use show please, as you're so sure? What are those systems called?None of that evidence that GWR raked up from Trainline is proof of anything except ticket purchase with Railcards. Presumably a lot of tickets bought by a good customer! They need to match every one of those purchases with other facts, to provide evidence of wrongdoing, and they don't stand a snowball in hell's chance of doing that. That's what I meant previously by "fishing expedition". They are fishing for a large sum of cash from one of Trainline's better customers. Trainline ought to have a very robust view about that.
Perhaps you could also provide your thoughts on the fact that a witness statement, as well as questions and answers, constitute evidence itself, sometimes the only evidence, even if the answers were "no comment". Failure to respond is evidence. How much weight is attached to that is a matter for a jury or the judiciary depending on the arena.
Just to be clear, you're sure you're not making a defematory statement about an organisation based on your own very well researched and fact checked assumptions and with absolutely no knowledge gaps, based on a random stranger giving a story on a web forum?