The Planner
Veteran Member
- Joined
- 15 Apr 2008
- Messages
- 17,856
The high numbered platforms, it was what used to be called the parcels deck above the platforms.Which part of the current Euston are you describing here?
The high numbered platforms, it was what used to be called the parcels deck above the platforms.Which part of the current Euston are you describing here?
The upper deck over the north end of the train shed (not open to the public)
Take a look on google maps it's quite obvious
The high numbered platforms, it was what used to be called the parcels deck above the platforms.
The high numbered platforms, it was what used to be called the parcels deck above the platforms.
The upper deck over the north end of the train shed (not open to the public)
Take a look on google maps it's quite obvious
Likely just a work in progressAh yeah, spotted it straight away on Google Maps!
What was the reason behind removing only a part of it, rather than all?
Perhaps Mr Sunak in 2023 had something to do with the work not progressingLikely just a work in progress
Ah yeah, spotted it straight away on Google Maps!
What was the reason behind removing only a part of it, rather than all?
Likely just a work in progress
Perhaps Mr Sunak in 2023 had something to do with the work not progressing
That was the more recent video I was looking for.When I was in Euston last month I saw workers at the HS2 works there
Already lost a couple of platforms. I don't think Euston can afford to lose anymore and keep the current service working.I think the most effective way to do it would be to start removing the building in stages, based on whatever the functional unit of the structure is. You'd probably only have to close 2-4 platforms at a time.
Christmas / New Year period only depending how it falls in relation to the weekends at the beginning and end of the period, the best you will get will be 15 days without causing mass disruption I reckon.I suppose you could just close the station, do a controlled implosion and then throw everyone possible at it to clear the rubble off the platforms and get temporary overhead wiring back up - but that would likely take weeks from closure to even partial reopening.
You would never get a 15 day complete closure at Euston. Not even Paddington with Euston diversions would ever get that long. It would be done half station at a time.Already lost a couple of platforms. I don't think Euston can afford to lose anymore and keep the current service working.
Christmas / New Year period only depending how it falls in relation to the weekends at the beginning and end of the period, the best you will get will be 15 days without causing mass disruption I reckon.
Didn't Paddington have some long closures over the Christmas holiday period with Waterloo and Marylebone diversions during Crossrail construction?You would never get a 15 day complete closure at Euston. Not even Paddington with Euston diversions would ever get that long. It would be done half station at a time.
Didn't Paddington have some long closures over the Christmas holiday period with Waterloo and Marylebone diversions during Crossrail construction?
In any event I think its is extremely unlikely to get 15 days at Euston at Christmas / New Year and impossible the rest of the year
Correct. The Hampstead Road is a major utilities corridor (and plenty of tram rail still buried under the tarmac too).Latest shots from around Euston:
What is this "blue shed" on top of the Granby Terrace bridge? Looks like maybe something to hold utilities temporarily rerouted from Hampstead Road.
Currently, the property company, Lendlease, is the government’s Master Development Partner for Euston and is responsible for developing a master plan for the area above and around the stations. Lendlease has now set up a 50/50 joint venture with the Crown Estate for several of its projects, including the HS2 Euston station redevelopment.
I mean...a win is a win. Progress is progress. I wonder when the final station design will be released.Ian Visits has picked up an item that the Crown Estate has taken a 50% stake in the development company setup to exploit the oversite of HS2 Euston station. That in itself isn't going to get the station built but perhaps demonstrates that the government is keen to push this forward.
https://www.ianvisits.co.uk/article...-euston-station-oversite-redevelopment-81268/
Technically the King owns the Crown Estate but reality is its an independent property investor whose profits go to the government.
RSHP has been separately appointed to work on its own Euston Station Campus vision for the Euston Partnership
This campus plan aims to mesh together these three elements, and according to an HS2 spokesperson, ‘will comprise the new HS2 station, an upgraded Network Rail station and enhancements to the London Underground station and local transport facilities along with a significant level of development’.
Part of the reason for the redesign is not being 6 platforms...Or if it's still 6 platforms..
Has that been said officially somewhere?Part of the reason for the redesign is not being 6 platforms...
The Crown Estate also already own a lot of land in the estates between the Euston lines and Regents Park, so it doesn't surprise me they're taking an interest in the area.Ian Visits has picked up an item that the Crown Estate has taken a 50% stake in the development company setup to exploit the oversite of HS2 Euston station. That in itself isn't going to get the station built but perhaps demonstrates that the government is keen to push this forward.
https://www.ianvisits.co.uk/article...-euston-station-oversite-redevelopment-81268/
Technically the King owns the Crown Estate but reality is its an independent property investor whose profits go to the government.
They are all incredibly linked to the station.It looks like both of these recent appointments are for masterplanning of the bits that *aren't* the HS2 station itself.
So neither seem to involve redesign (or any design) of the station, which remains as a black box with a question mark on it.