My reply to the Jehovah Witnesses has always been short and sweet.
I'm a Jehovah's By-stander. I don't want to be involved!
There is a meeting house just below St. Erth station but I cannot remember if it is for Jehovah's Witnesses, 7th day Adventists, or the Quakers. Come to think on, the Quakers Meeting house is just before the station in Penzance.
Why did you feel it necessary to include the Quakers with the Jehovah's Witnesses and the Seventh Day Adventists?
I do wonder why it is deemed acceptable to be rude - this is quite mild - about religiously inclined people these days. There are, of course, many extremely "strong" minds who are religious. And some of the piffle put about by some rationalists could equally be described as "fairy tales".
Why did you feel it necessary to include the Quakers with the Jehovah's Witnesses and the Seventh Day Adventists?
My reply to the Jehovah Witnesses has always been short and sweet.
I'm a Jehovah's By-stander. I don't want to be involved!
There is a meeting house just below St. Erth station but I cannot remember if it is for Jehovah's Witnesses, 7th day Adventists, or the Quakers. Come to think on, the Quakers Meeting house is just before the station in Penzance.
I used to do quite a bit of door-knocking for the Lib Dems. Probably should get back into it, it's good exercise.
I do wonder why it is deemed acceptable to be rude - this is quite mild - about religiously inclined people these days. There are, of course, many extremely "strong" minds who are religious. And some of the piffle put about by some rationalists could equally be described as "fairy tales".
I don't want anyone in my face selling me anything. God, glazing, Greenpeace or accident claims (couldn't think of a 'g'). Full stop.
I don't want them phoning me up, at any time.
I don't want them knocking on my door, at any time.
I want to live my life without unnecessary interference from anyone. If I want a product I am perfectly capable of approaching a seller in person, by phone or email. When the phone rings I want it to be someone I want to talk to (hallelujah for free caller display). If there's a knock at the door I want it to be a friend, neighbour or delivery person (praise the lord for spy holes in doors).
:roll:
We get a couple of young Mormons a few times a year in Newtown sometimes they use the train, you can spot them a mile off thanfully.
Just offer them your copy of "Blood Transfusion Monthly"...
I don't want anyone in my face selling me anything. God, glazing, Greenpeace or accident claims (couldn't think of a 'g'). Full stop.
I don't want them phoning me up, at any time.
I don't want them knocking on my door, at any time.
I want to live my life without unnecessary interference from anyone.
I do wonder why it is deemed acceptable to be rude - this is quite mild - about religiously inclined people these days. There are, of course, many extremely "strong" minds who are religious. And some of the piffle put about by some rationalists could equally be described as "fairy tales".
I used to do quite a bit of door-knocking for the Lib Dems. Probably should get back into it, it's good exercise.
We were always told that if they wanted you to go away then you just go, never argue with them. It's commercial sales (and I count chuggers as commercial) who are really difficult to get rid of in my experience
I put religion in the same category as people who believe in homeopathy, ghosts, fortune telling, astrology, the loch ness monster and the rest of the hocum. People are indoctrinated with religion virtually from birth, so it's not surprising a lot of people believe, often without knowing why, nor having had any kind of spiritual experience, they believe because they have never thought not to. The Jesuits always said 'Give me a child until he is seven, and I will give you the man'.
Yet America and the middle east with its persecution of atheists are bastions of democracy and tolerance.Freedom of speech and expression allows you to make such comments without fear of what may have happened in the past under the Spanish Inquisition and in this very day and age in the areas under the control of ISIL, so it is amazing therefore that Christianity, Buddhism, Islam, etc, still have millions of followers around the world in the 21st century. I wonder how you discuss this matter of "belief without knowledge" with the Dalai Lama.
Look at states where religion has been forcibly suppressed in past days. Would you say that human enlightenment was a natural follow-up to this suppression or was the suppression of religion a means for indoctrination in something political that would suit the rulers of these states?
Yet America and the middle east with its persecution of atheists are bastions of democracy and tolerance.
Yet America and the middle east with its persecution of atheists are bastions of democracy and tolerance.
In the same way that Communism and its ruling elite in China and the USSR in times not too far removed carried out persecution of those who would not give up their religious beliefs.
Just out of interest, which atheists do the Americans persecute ?
That is a possibility. If people feel threatened - in this case by something they don't really understand - an aggressive response is natural.Maybe it is a response to the veiled threats. .....
I have no problem with you having that approach, though I personally believe an adherence to strict rationalism closes off a wealth of experiences which I quite enjoy. But I have no need to call rationalists names!I think so, because it's a belief based on no rational evidence. ...
There are seven states which ban atheists from running for office.
That is a possibility. If people feel threatened - in this case by something they don't really understand - an aggressive response is natural.
How can you possibly justify what you say above as an example of the "persecution" in America that you stated in your earlier post.
In Britain, unless a law repeal has been made of which I am unaware, it is not possible for a Roman Catholic to hold a certain office of statehood, but this is not "persecution" in the widely-understood meaning of the word.
How can you possibly justify what you say above as an example of the "persecution" in America that you stated in your earlier post.
In Britain, unless a law repeal has been made of which I am unaware, it is not possible for a Roman Catholic to hold a certain office of statehood, but this is not "persecution" in the widely-understood meaning of the word.
hostility and ill-treatment, especially because of race or political or religious beliefs; oppression
What banning people of a certain faith from running for political office is persecution
Google defined persecution for me as....
Your phraseology used above (unless you have purposely omitted punctuation) does not read correctly. Can you clarify, please, as what you say goes totally against the point you made in an earlier posting.
Come now, young sir, Google is not to be taken as the fount of all knowledge as only human beings with human frailties are the composers of such entries.
So is the entire Internet. So is everything else ever published. What source do you want then?