What did ASLEF stand for again?Could be worse, at least they don't call drivers engineers like Amtrak...
What's wrong with it? It describes what they do, doesn't it? Ultimately, they are employed for the benefit of customers.
"Customer driver" is still vomit-inducing. Engineer is also a more appropriate term in the US, given the wider range of duties they tend to undertake there.Could be worse, at least they don't call drivers engineers like Amtrak...
"Customer driver" is still vomit-inducing. Engineer is also a more appropriate term in the US, given the wider range of duties they tend to undertake there.
I think that Customer Driver and Ambassador are quite clever job titles - designed specifically to distance themselves from the rest of the rail industry and the entrenched habits of many staff."Customer driver" is just silly, the job is "driver", or "train driver" if you must.
Maybe they can claim asylum on the train?Would any passenger say or think, 'I need to speak to the ambassador'...?
"Engineer" is a protected title in many countries - you cannot claim to be one unless you have a degree or similar qualification in engineering. Sir Nigel Gresley was an engineer. Joe Duddington wasn't."Customer driver" is still vomit-inducing. Engineer is also a more appropriate term in the US, given the wider range of duties they tend to undertake there.
Quite."Engineer" is a protected title in many countries - you cannot claim to be one unless you have a degree or similar qualification in engineering.
I think that Customer Driver and Ambassador are quite clever job titles - designed specifically to distance themselves from the rest of the rail industry and the entrenched habits of many staff.
I think that Customer Driver and Ambassador are quite clever job titles - designed specifically to distance themselves from the rest of the rail industry and the entrenched habits of many staff.
I think that Customer Driver and Ambassador are quite clever job titles - designed specifically to distance themselves from the rest of the rail industry and the entrenched habits of many staff.
Will I be reported to Personnel or Human Resources, now there's a quandary.
I think it's as much for the customers as well, at least the Ambassador title - if you have a role called guard, many people would now associate them with cancelled services due to strikes, so getting rid of the guard job title, rightly or wrongly, moves Lumo away from association with poor customer service experienced on other trains.Rather self indulgent isn't it, if your customers can't decipher your job titles because you're seemingly engaged in a one sided ideological battle against internal industry politics that don't really affect your own company.
Drifting wildly off-topic, but it's just an excuse to try and elevate the status of the position without actually paying them anymore than a steward...
Good for them, still a bloody awful job title though (don't get me started on the "customer" v "passenger" argument).According to the job advert that went up, they're on £30k, so I imagine they ARE actually being paid more than most (non-dispatch) on board crew
I think it's as much for the customers as well, at least the Ambassador title - if you have a role called guard, many people would now associate them with cancelled services due to strikes, so getting rid of the guard job title, rightly or wrongly, moves Lumo away from association with poor customer service experienced on other trains.
How many TOCs actually use 'Guard' as the job role title (even if that's what many passengers/customers call them)...?
How many TOCs actually use 'Guard' as the job role title (even if that's what many passengers/customers call them)...?
As the job titles are silly, according to the internet, was there a shortage of applicants?
Likewise, if the job titles are silly, let’s see whether that leads to a shortage of customers.
At least the champagne will be cheaperHow will we quantify if passengers are mealy bemused by the title? The number of complaints on Twitter about the lack of onboard Ferrero Rocher?
East Coast called them guards right until Virgin changed the grade name to train managers.SWT was the only post privatisation TOC I knew of that did that, conductor/senior conductor/train manager are more common. I don't know if SWR carried it on.
Though that did come with a change in responsibilities as they took on responsibility for organising the catering crews, with the senior hosts binned, so it was a logical rename.East Coast called them guards right until Virgin changed the grade name to train managers.
I'm guessing to cover the passenger's off TPE 1612 Edinburgh to Manchester Airport which was cancelled due to the weather. The stop at York allowing connections in to other TPE service to Manchester.1E86 (803001) has just called at York, conveying passengers diverted from West Coast Mainline due to the weather disruption, the first passenger call of these at York.
Stopped with only one door on platform (where track joins plat 3 prior to bridge), and customers exited via local door release
Yep, been acceptance with lner and XC for services between York and Edinburgh all day.I'm guessing to cover the passenger's off TPE 1612 Edinburgh to Manchester Airport which was cancelled due to the weather. The stop at York allowing connections in to other TPE service to Manchester.