Surely the strong incentive is for them to operate over the full period they are being paid for?Still, if they go off-lease in (say) 2027, there's a strong incentive to get them replaced before then.
Surely the strong incentive is for them to operate over the full period they are being paid for?Still, if they go off-lease in (say) 2027, there's a strong incentive to get them replaced before then.
Ive always wondered what southeastern have against the MetCams for them to be off lease before BRELs. Generally speaking , they are much better. They feature greater continuous acceleration rate, better internal environment, apparently a better miles per technical incident record, and overall , cleaner, despite the lack of percieved maintainence on all southeastern metro fleetYes and no: yes in that half of them have been withdrawn and the other half will be at the earliest opportunity, but no in the sense that a date hasn't been confirmed for the rest. The discussion about them going by the end of this year seems to have originated from a speculated cascade in this thread.
They got back to me:The WhatsApp person didn't know but they said the contact form people should know. It's under OLR anyway, so it shouldn't be too hard to find out.
I've enquired on your behalf with the Contract Managers within our Engineering team. However, I'm afraid they've advised that this isn't information we're able to disclose, as the details of lease contracts with the rolling stock companies are confidential and commercially sensitive.
Ive always wondered what southeastern have against the MetCams for them to be off lease before BRELs. Generally speaking , they are much better. They feature greater continuous acceleration rate, better internal environment, apparently a better miles per technical incident record, and overall , cleaner, despite the lack of percieved maintainence on all southeastern metro fleet
So i find that really strange.
Its a shame i guess. They seem to have a decent amount though. But yeah when it fomes to keeping timetables, they are the better train for sure.Notwithstanding anything else, there aren’t as many of them (especially bearing in mind each class 466 is half the length of a 465). That will always put them at a disadvantage as if you are to cut costs getting rid of one part of a fleet is one way to make some savings, and it tends to be the minority fleet that goes.
Notwithstanding anything else, there aren’t as many of them (especially bearing in mind each class 466 is half the length of a 465). That will always put them at a disadvantage as if you are to cut costs getting rid of one part of a fleet is one way to make some savings, and it tends to be the minority fleet that goes.
Met Cam units have an ongoing issue causing bolster cracks which need to be repaired at Doncaster. There are also issues with sourcing parts for the units.Ive always wondered what southeastern have against the MetCams for them to be off lease before BRELs. Generally speaking , they are much better. They feature greater continuous acceleration rate, better internal environment, apparently a better miles per technical incident record, and overall , cleaner, despite the lack of percieved maintainence on all southeastern metro fleet
So i find that really strange.
Right. I seeMet Cam units have an ongoing issue causing bolster cracks which need to be repaired at Doncaster. There are also issues with sourcing parts for the units.