At the risk of going off topic, if Network Rail were to wire the middle lines between Northfield and Longbridge, then they’d have to replace the headspans with portals or twin-track cantilevers. As I don’t think they can ‘add’ new components to existing headspans?
They could, in theory, but with different physical parameters such as span lengths (along-track separation of structures) being taken into consideration, NR would probably prefer to use portals (at areas greater than 4-track or where S&C is present) and TTCs (plain line up to quadruple track). I can probably see widespread renewal of equipment once the final designs for the alteration of the track layout at Kings Norton is determined, but that's something for another thread.
Certainly, headspans were designed to be fairly modular, as long as most physical constraints were adhered to (such as tension in the catenary & contact wires). The only adjustments required would be the clamping of the new equipment into the spanwires, and adjustment of the head span wire (the one that runs from the mast tops) to suit if required.
On the MML, 2 large ceramic insulators on the lower span wire were added in over the 10-foot, to electrically separate the Fasts & Slows; these had a proclivity for failure towards the end of the 2000s and were replaced with new lightweight polymeric (i.e. silicone) insulators.
Lots of the old brown ceramic insulators have been replaced on headspans elsewhere, such as huge swathes of the WCML (as part of WCRM) and on the London section of the GWML too IIRC.
TL;DR: small to medium adjustments to headspans can easily be made, but in the case of Kings Norton - Longbridge - Barnt Green, renewal and replacement with new equipment seems to be the most likely course of action IMHO.
Anyhow, back to the MML proper!