• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Morpeth Curve

Status
Not open for further replies.

Class 170101

Established Member
Joined
1 Mar 2014
Messages
7,942
But the service could be re-written to terminate Morpeth services at Newcastle with other DMU services running through instead.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Mark62

Member
Joined
3 Apr 2014
Messages
312
The ruling linespeed round there is 110mph.

Roughly speaking, a 50mph speed restriction of approx half mile on an otherwise 110mph railway costs 2m20sec for a 250metre passenger train.

Having said that, a bypass would be about a mile shorter, which would save another 30 seconds (at 110mph). Therefore, 3 minutes, for about 3 miles of new railway (including a viaduct across a particularly sensitive part of the River Wansbeck.)
And that would be a complete waste of money and is never going to happen. Thankfully
 

adamedwards

Member
Joined
4 Apr 2016
Messages
796
And that would be a complete waste of money and is never going to happen. Thankfully
Also need to factor in the savings on all the fast trains not slowing down and then consuming power accelerating back up to 110mph over a 30 year payback period. Any one able to estimate that?
 

deltic08

On Moderation
Joined
26 Aug 2013
Messages
2,719
Location
North
Also need to factor in the savings on all the fast trains not slowing down and then consuming power accelerating back up to 110mph over a 30 year payback period. Any one able to estimate that?
You have a point. Congestion relief is another one and the payback period is 60 years usually but has to have a good business case in the first place unlike HS2 which is being built with a very poor business case..
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Bald Rick

Veteran Member
Joined
28 Sep 2010
Messages
29,218
Also need to factor in the savings on all the fast trains not slowing down and then consuming power accelerating back up to 110mph over a 30 year payback period. Any one able to estimate that?

With regen braking, it will be peanuts in the scheme of things. Maybe a fiver a train net. Maybe £1m a year.
 

Meerkat

Established Member
Joined
14 Jul 2018
Messages
7,547
Would only be worthwhile if you were building properly fast lines from Newcastle to at least north of Pegswood, with the current lines left for a proper suburban service.
But that certainly wouldn’t happen if HS2 is planned to go via West Coast (is that the current plan, I saw the options but didn’t realise they had decided?)
 

Killingworth

Established Member
Joined
30 May 2018
Messages
4,891
Location
Sheffield
We seem to be repeating points made months ago.

In 1825 the Stockton and Darlington Railway opened. In 1847 the line through Morpeth was opened and trains ran between London and Edinburgh by 1850.

Speeds were somehat lower in those days but the topography is against a relief line unless there was a large pot of money available. The size is such that a lot of other projects would score a lot higher in any cost/benefit analysis. There are many of those set out in other threads.
 

Fradgie

Member
Joined
14 Nov 2013
Messages
9
There does not appear to be any pictures of D9011 stood on its own at Morpeth station immediately after the 1969 accident - I don't know if anyone has got any images of the Deltic in the station together with the remnants of the brake van that was coupled immediately behind it?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top