MonsooN
Member
I saw the Network Rail "Banana train" as I was heading out of Bristol TM last week. Will that also change to a Class 800 or will it remain an HST as it's not for passengers?
I saw the Network Rail "Banana train" as I was heading out of Bristol TM last week. Will that also change to a Class 800 or will it remain an HST as it's not for passengers?
I saw the Network Rail "Banana train" as I was heading out of Bristol TM last week. Will that also change to a Class 800 or will it remain an HST as it's not for passengers?
I saw the Network Rail "Banana train" as I was heading out of Bristol TM last week. Will that also change to a Class 800 or will it remain an HST as it's not for passengers?
I saw the Network Rail "Banana train" as I was heading out of Bristol TM last week. Will that also change to a Class 800 or will it remain an HST as it's not for passengers?
They could, you know, buy one...Where would a departmental 800 be sourced from?
Japan spends the money to have purpose built test trainsThey could, you know, buy one...
JR Central's Class 923 "Doctor Yellow" set T4 on the Sanyo Shinkansen, March 2010
Doctor Yellow (ドクターイエロー) is the nickname for the high-speed test trains that are used on the Japanese Shinkansen ("Bullet Train") dedicated express passenger train routes. The trains have special equipment on board to monitor the condition of the track and overhead wire, including special instrumented bogies and observation blisters.[1]
So that's one each for the Shinkansen operations of JR East, JR West and JR Central. Seems reasonable. Non bullet-train based trains aren't an option, as the "classic" network in Japan has a different track gauge. SNCF have IRIS 320 for their network and HS1, modified from a withdrawn TGV Réseau. HS2 might see the GB network needing a new-build High Speed recording train? DB have ICE S, cobbled together from old power cars and carriages.Japan spends the money to have purpose built test trains
An 800-based test train would (currently) be less capable than the New Measurement Train. The NMT can operate over all lines it needs to, with the only restriction being that it can't do EPS tilting speeds on the West Coast Main Line. Network Rail doesn't seem to consider this to be an issue that it needs to address, and obviously the AT300 series would not address it anyway.
Given the lack of any UIC GB gauge connection from HS1 to HS2, hiring IRIS 320 would seem out of the question, hence I presume either it'll have to be done by the NMT or some new train (you might get away with converting some existing ETCS-capable high-speed train, depending on if it being fully captive would work).SNCF have IRIS 320 for their network and HS1, modified from a withdrawn TGV Réseau. HS2 might see the GB network needing a new-build High Speed recording train?
Just use a 373? Better than have it go to scrap.Given the lack of any UIC GB gauge connection from HS1 to HS2, hiring IRIS 320 would seem out of the question, hence I presume either it'll have to be done by the NMT or some new train (you might get away with converting some existing ETCS-capable high-speed train, depending on if it being fully captive would work).
AIUI, no space to fit ETCS equipment. (Though presumably one could strip out TVM/KVB/TBL, which might work?)Just use a 373? Better than have it go to scrap.
Painting it yellow just makes it look even more like a duck...Japan spends the money to have purpose built test trains
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
![]()
JR Central's Class 923 "Doctor Yellow" set T4 on the Sanyo Shinkansen, March 2010
Doctor Yellow (ドクターイエロー) is the nickname for the high-speed test trains that are used on the Japanese Shinkansen ("Bullet Train") dedicated express passenger train routes. The trains have special equipment on board to monitor the condition of the track and overhead wire, including special instrumented bogies and observation blisters.[1]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doctor_Yellow
I saw the Network Rail "Banana train" as I was heading out of Bristol TM last week. Will that also change to a Class 800 or will it remain an HST as it's not for passengers?
They could, you know, buy one...
An 800-based test train would (currently) be less capable than the New Measurement Train. The NMT can operate over all lines it needs to, with the only restriction being that it can't do EPS tilting speeds on the West Coast Main Line. Network Rail doesn't seem to consider this to be an issue that it needs to address, and obviously the AT300 series would not address it anyway.
If the reliability of the NMT is fine, then Network Rail won't want to spend money on a new train that has clearance issues.
Is that the best use of tax payers money.............................
If you're looking for a go-anywhere train, 442's are derived from Mk3s and a Class 37 is RA3...No-one's suggested a Pacer or a 442 for the job yet, is there a problem with the board?![]()
Tbf, it's not really the OPs fault, this was split from the original class 800 thread, but a note hasn't been put down yet.
Your idea is pretty pointless, a one off build? Thats going to be extremely expensive.I saw the Network Rail "Banana train" as I was heading out of Bristol TM last week. Will that also change to a Class 800 or will it remain an HST as it's not for passengers?
AIUI, no space to fit ETCS equipment. (Though presumably one could strip out TVM/KVB/TBL, which might work?)
In cab signalling equipment.Could the acronyms/abbreviations please be translated into plain English?AIUI, no space to fit ETCS equipment. (Though presumably one could strip out TVM/KVB/TBL, which might work?)
Could the acronyms/abbreviations please be translated into plain English?
I believe it is forum policy not to use acronyms or abbreviations without first saying what they mean.