As a Thameslink traveller I get to spend quite a bit of time on platforms waiting for my train to arrive. Watching trains go by in the other direction, I've noticed that at least two of Thameslink's trains have been named after destinations on the network: in particular I've seen Brighton and St Albans.
This seems a rather odd idea to me. Surely there's a risk that some passengers will confuse the train's name with its destination and board a train that isn't serving that place. I would be surprised if the company were so operationally robust as to limit these trains to services stopping at the destination they are named after.
Giving trains a name may add a bit of interest and colour to the railways, but this particular idea doesn't seem very thought through.
This seems a rather odd idea to me. Surely there's a risk that some passengers will confuse the train's name with its destination and board a train that isn't serving that place. I would be surprised if the company were so operationally robust as to limit these trains to services stopping at the destination they are named after.
Giving trains a name may add a bit of interest and colour to the railways, but this particular idea doesn't seem very thought through.