I've heard conflicting information about the performance of wind power. My understanding is that off-shore is more effective than on-shore, but how consistent is the output?
Is it good enough that we can do without any alternative sources? Would we need batteries in every home or localised diesel generators to cover the transient peak demand?
Output generally hovers in in 3-6GW range, which depending on the time of year and day of the week can be anything from 5% to 20% of demand. I'd say it averages around 10% - higher in the summer due to lower demand.
It would be inappropriate to go 100% wind power for exactly the reason you state, but it's good to cover demand above immediate base load (nuclear and hydro), with CCGT making up the difference to cover variations in demand. CCGT can be easily switched on and off at very short notice, so it's a good technology for that.
At this time of year variations in wind power are nothing to worry about since demand is quite high and so CCGT (and coal) will always make up the difference. In the summer, coal output is negligible (this summer it hit 0 a few times actually), and CCGT output is very low in comparison to winter. On days with very high wind output and very low demand (say, a Sunday in June) we may encounter issues of overproduction from wind. That day hasn't come yet though, as the lowest I can see CCGT getting down to last year (at a quick glance) is around 6-7GW.
UK installed wind capacity has skyrocketed from 2.974GW to 13.602GW between 2008 and 2015. I think a lot of the misconceptions on this forum about wind power being negligible come from not realising just how much of an increase has occurred in the last few years. Even if only 25% of the capacity can be realised at any one time due to varied winds, that is still more than 4 times the electricity generation it was producing only 8 years ago.
26.9GW of additional offshore capacity is in planning as we speak, with 1.4GW under construction right now.