All of that matches up with what I'd heard - but which goal did she score - the third or the fourth?
The third goal wasn't a goal, so probably that one!
All of that matches up with what I'd heard - but which goal did she score - the third or the fourth?
Was unlucky enough to catch the whole of Ledstrom's speech this morning read wholly from a script. No questions from the press, or public.
She needs thorough scrutiny; and also whoever becomes our PM should call an immediate General Election - which is exactly what the Tories wanted when Brown succeeded Blair.
Hypocrites in politics? Perish the thought.
A General Election could be disastrous for Britain right now.
If Labour don't come out with a strong guarantee that they would respect democracy and sign Article 50 if they were elected, they could get wiped out oop North. Britain would in effect become a one-party state, a Tory kleptocracy run to benefit only the very wealthiest at the expense of everybody else.
That is what we have, and it's what we will continue to have precisely because we have left the EU. It's only going to get worse, with May wanting to get rid of the ECHR and Leadsom wanting worse.
There are umpteen threads on this forum dedicated to the EU, but I will point out that there are nineteen countries signed up to the ECHR who are not members of the EU.
The point I was making is that a snap General Election at this point in time would likely lead to disaster for the country, especially if Labour did not guarantee they would respect democracy, as it would effectively give the Tories two extra years in power.
If Labour don't come out with a strong guarantee that they would respect democracy and sign Article 50 if they were elected, they could get wiped out oop North. Britain would in effect become a one-party state, a Tory kleptocracy run to benefit only the very wealthiest at the expense of everybody else.
If she cannot keep her own religious beliefs out of the political arena then she should not be PM. Church and state must be kept separate.
If she cannot keep her own religious beliefs out of the political arena then she should not be PM. Church and state must be kept separate.
She is exceptionally religious, and in a way that you would normally expect to see in the deep south of the US. Properly anti-gay marriage, anti-abortion in all situations, anti-divorce, you can't have morals without a god, you can't be British and not a Christian, sex outside marriage is a perversion, non-believers will burn in hell, evolution is a lie, any science that goes against the bible is false etc.
At one point she stated that my bachelors dissertation (some very simple genetic modification of plants) is physically impossible because "Only God can create life".
She is easily the most fundamentalist religious person I have ever encountered in real life, as well as one of the most stubbornly closed-minded to boot. That she presumably has a chance of winning the Conservative leadership and therefore becoming PM genuinely makes me fear for the future of things like freedom of religion and secular education.
We now know one thing about the next PM: She won't be a man.
what about Labour?
what about Labour?
It's actually very scary that a lunatic like Andrea Loathesom now has a reasonable chance of becoming PM.
Agreed, but her nutty anti-gay views will only really appeal to Muslims and very old people, so hopefully she won't win.
Considering that it is conservative party members who are voting on this national matter (how very democratic!) I would have thought that the latter would have been a significant demographic.
Going from the results of the MP's votes, if all of Gove's votes went to Leadsom, then May should still take 1.5 times as many votes as her (assuming that party members vote like the MPs)
Labour won't be into power before September, at which point either May or Leadsom will become PM
"Labour won't be in power by September". Or anytime within the next five years. Will people saying the new PM must call an election please realise
that we have a fixed term parliament act and that the PM no longer has the power to call an election. It would require a vote in parliament with a two thirds majority to trigger an election and too many MPs would be afraid of losing their seats to achieve that.
Only if they abandon their slothful ways and actually go and vote. I want a new badge 'I'm a 48-er' both showing how I voted and the fact that I was born in 1948. It's a calumny to say all 'old people' voted no - 40% didn't.
A bird as PM? worlds gone mad. Women know your limits. This politics lark is no place for a woman. Who will do the cooking and cleaning? What about the Ironing? Not on. Bring back Farage.
Shouldn't be long before the offended bus arrives...........![]()
there are insufficient women on here
For the avoidance of doubt i am not worried by the next PM being our first women PM. I am more worried abut them being a Tory
there are insufficient women on here
For the avoidance of doubt i am not worried by the next PM being our first women PM. I am more worried abut them being a Tory