Mcr Warrior
Veteran Member
- Joined
- 8 Jan 2009
- Messages
- 11,860
How about 11 months of 30 days, then a June with 35 (or 36 days), when the weather is usually good in the Northern hemisphere?
Worse than that - it was Julius Caesar!Let's have a petition to abolish leap years - silly idea in the first place. Wasn't it the brainchild of some pope or other? We don't want any of these foreign ideas.
Even if the systems work on GMT ( as UT* ) as an underlying value and apply a differential to that?But to change the date to be different to every other country? That’ll break almost all IT systems everywhere.
Taking everything you've said, most of which sailed over my head, the bonus is it helps keep you in a job, which itself is no bad thing. Embrace itI’m a member of the timezone co-ordination team at my work (not a joke). Leap seconds in general cause us a load of pain*, as do timezone changes that some countries have done with very little notice.
The normal software update cycle in large organisations means it takes weeks for things to filter through from design, development, testing and into production.
Examples of issues we’ve had to deal with where I work:
- software that parses text-based date and timestamps needs to be able to handle a time that ends with a :60 second
- lots of software isn’t designed to take into account the idea of time going backwards (even local time). When the clocks change and so go backwards, some of the organisations we interface with decide to instead “slew” the change over the course of a day etc by making each second in their timestamps be slightly less than an second until they fall in line with the correct time again. Of course different organisations do this at different speeds. We then have to convert this into the actual time
- we have some things that have to happen at a specific time of day in a certain country, happens to be the exact time that their clocks go back, so that time occurs twice. When do we execute that task?
Changing a country’s timezone offset and when they do daylight saving isn’t too bad though, as the existing data structures everyone uses already support this. But to change the date to be different to every other country? That’ll break almost all IT systems everywhere.
Amusing as posts here are in response to the petition, it is always worth remembering that date and time changes can cause real problems.I’m a member of the timezone co-ordination team at my work (not a joke). Leap seconds in general cause us a load of pain*, as do timezone changes that some countries have done with very little notice.
The normal software update cycle in large organisations means it takes weeks for things to filter through from design, development, testing and into production.
Examples of issues we’ve had to deal with where I work:
- software that parses text-based date and timestamps needs to be able to handle a time that ends with a :60 second
- lots of software isn’t designed to take into account the idea of time going backwards (even local time). When the clocks change and so go backwards, some of the organisations we interface with decide to instead “slew” the change over the course of a day etc by making each second in their timestamps be slightly less than an second until they fall in line with the correct time again. Of course different organisations do this at different speeds. We then have to convert this into the actual time
- we have some things that have to happen at a specific time of day in a certain country, happens to be the exact time that their clocks go back, so that time occurs twice. When do we execute that task?
Changing a country’s timezone offset and when they do daylight saving isn’t too bad though, as the existing data structures everyone uses already support this. But to change the date to be different to every other country? That’ll break almost all IT systems everywhere.
I'm applying for a job with the Flat Earth Society on the same principle.Taking everything you've said, most of which sailed over my head, the bonus is it helps keep you in a job, which itself is no bad thing. Embrace it
Are you suggesting a timezone that is a whole 24 hours offset from UTC? That’d be… interesting.Even if the systems work on GMT ( as UT* ) as an underlying value and apply a differential to that?
*UT, for those who aren't aware of this, is Universal Time which is for all intents and purposes the same as GMT**
**Greenwich Mean Time, before anyone asks.
Timezones can be a whole lot of crazy, especially around the international date line.Some Australian timezones are offset by 30 minutes from standard timezones (across most of the world the minutes of the hour are the same wherever you are - it's just the hour that changes). Must make national conference calls and the like interesting.
Every four years we all get an extra day of life...
Actually, if this was done in January, this would make the month more bearable.... I would be perfectly happy to hibernate for 12 days during the harsh winterBritain did actually skip 11 days in September 1752 - people went to bed on 2 September and woke up on 14 September.
But your employer would not have such a big staff payment in January in that case and you would be short of two weeks pension contributions.Actually, if this was done in January, this would make the month more bearable.... I would be perfectly happy to hibernate for 12 days during the harsh winter
True, but how my work-life balance works these days, sleep is far more importantBut your employer would not have such a big staff payment in January in that case and you would be short of two weeks pension contributions.
I’d start my hibernation a week before Christmas and finish it a week afterActually, if this was done in January, this would make the month more bearable.... I would be perfectly happy to hibernate for 12 days during the harsh winter
But that would mean losing Bank Holidays.I’d start my hibernation a week before Christmas and finish it a week after
I'm retired. I don't get Bank Holidays. I don't get days off. Every day is a work dayBut that would mean losing Bank Holidays.
No, the most it would be is 12 hours plus or minus GMT / UT.Are you suggesting a timezone that is a whole 24 hours offset from UTC? That’d be… interesting.
The rather more populous countries of Iran, Afghanistan and India also have timezones at 30 minute offsets. Weirdest of all is Nepal which is 15 minutes ahead of India!Some Australian timezones are offset by 30 minutes from standard timezones (across most of the world the minutes of the hour are the same wherever you are - it's just the hour that changes). Must make national conference calls and the like interesting.
- lots of software isn’t designed to take into account the idea of time going backwards (even local time)
Not being au fait with computer searching properly, what is the number reached in this online petition at this moment in time.
You would think, but ...No, the most it would be is 12 hours plus or minus GMT / UT.
Well, certainly an extra 24 hours on their hands this year!Some people have too much time on their hands.