edwin_m
Veteran Member
I made it clear (I thought) that if a contract containing exclusion clauses would prove too expensive, then don't finalise on tender decisions until one has certainty about the project. Getting planning permission (or TWA) plus possible LBC, is essential before spending sums on development. NR has taken a risk with this project, after Whitby went to JR, and it could have all gone horribly t*ts up.
It pretty much comes to the same thing. Contractors will plan ahead and expect to re-deploy staff from project X to project Y or indeed recruit if Y begins before X ends. They need a certain time to mobilise for a contract and if called upon to do so more quickly it will cost more and possibly also go wrong due to lack of planning. The alternative is not to start tendering until the TWA is in the bag, which is actually the usual approach but the tender period then goes into the critical path and delays everything else.
This legal delay has been pretty much unprecedented and I hope it doesn't mean that all future projects have to have an inbuilt pause of a couple of years just in case it happens again. Fortunately the designers have been continuing regardless and some work has been done on site in areas that don't directly impact on the sensitive parts, so it's not all been wasted.