All I see are websites and pictures of trains...Well they already failed to check what googling "Virgin Azuma" gets you as I'm reliably informed that in some cases, it doesn't get you a train...
All I see are websites and pictures of trains...Well they already failed to check what googling "Virgin Azuma" gets you as I'm reliably informed that in some cases, it doesn't get you a train...
They are alright. In all honesty I don't hate them (Although I fear I may have said I do in the past). I just prefer the 86/87/90 plus Mk3's. It was a more pleasant experience for me as I do find the 390's a bit claustropobic. The big kid in me likes the tilting so that isn't an issue. The vestibules can get a bit stinky by the toilets of which there aren't enough of (Apart from the smell). Some of the names they have been given are awful, Virgin Explorer sounds like something you can be charged with. Some of the Pendos when they get old enough will be trying to change their names by deed poll and wondering why their creators hated them.![]()
Ha ha. Cant wait to see what VTEC come up with for the Azuma when they name them.
The "don't know, have no idea, never been on one" option is missing from the poll.
All I see are websites and pictures of trains...
And what about the 'Meh' option: If I don't mind Pendolino's, but I hate travelling HSTs...
Use them a lot more these days than I used to. Good trains, good at what they do - first class is always a treat (especially with a nice advance!). I don't mind the tilt and don't really find the windows that bad either.
Absolutely nothing wrong with the units, one of the best things to happen to our railways.
All I see are websites and pictures of trains...
The "don't know, have no idea, never been on one" option is missing from the poll.
They do the job they were designed to do and AFAIK the public like them, well theyre always well loaded. I long distance commuted on them for nearly two years when they were new. Apart from a couple having to be rebooted in Euston and one sitting down at Stafford* and refusing to move, I was never late for work or getting home.
*Class 57 Lady Penelope RA Euston on the front of it eventually.
Not enough exterior view; not enough luggage space.
So, the people thinking they're awful are in a pretty small minority. Maybe it's time for some to change the record on here and accept they're not a bad train by any means.
Ok I work for VT so have some bias but if they were so bad, then why do the satisfaction rates come back as well as they do?
If you think those of us who don't like them are going to change our opinion, you are out of luck. They are badly specified, badly designed and badly built piles of junk.So, the people thinking they're awful are in a pretty small minority. Maybe it's time for some to change the record on here and accept they're not a bad train by any means.
Ok I work for VT so have some bias but if they were so bad, then why do the satisfaction rates come back as well as they do?
You have completely missed the point.ICEs don't fit the loading gauge and as they don't tilt would be restricted to 110mph. (ICE-T would be as small as a Pendolino)
You have completely missed the point.
Because we are talking about the interior fit rather than the loading gauge of the train.Er, how? What is the point of comparing a Pendolino with a train that would knock the platform off at the first station it got to, and that's if it didn't bring the wires down first?