• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Possible use for Class 350/2s

Status
Not open for further replies.

Whistler40145

Established Member
Joined
30 Apr 2010
Messages
5,918
Location
Lancashire
With Class 350/4s being cascaded to West Midlands Trains, presumably the Class 350/2s will be surplus.

Which TOC would they be most suitable with?
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

sprinterguy

Established Member
Joined
4 Mar 2010
Messages
11,065
Location
Macclesfield
The class 350/4s are in addition to the existing 350/2 fleet. The 350/2s will only be replaced by new 5-car class 730 Bombardier Aventras over the next couple of years.
 

adamedwards

Member
Joined
4 Apr 2016
Messages
796
The 350/2 fleet might have been a better choice for the EMR Corby service, but they won't be available soon enough. It needs more electrification to provide a home for them. Eg Nottingham - Sheffield - Leeds. But Grayling messed a that up, sadly.
 

Chester1

Established Member
Joined
25 Aug 2014
Messages
4,009
Aren't Porterbrook investigating adding batteries to them? That would open up a considerably range of services that they could run.
 

Whistler40145

Established Member
Joined
30 Apr 2010
Messages
5,918
Location
Lancashire
The 350/2 fleet might have been a better choice for the EMR Corby service, but they won't be available soon enough. It needs more electrification to provide a home for them. Eg Nottingham - Sheffield - Leeds. But Grayling messed a that up, sadly.
What didn’t Grayling mess up!
 

greatvoyager

Established Member
Joined
15 Aug 2019
Messages
2,426
Location
Exeter
The 350/2 fleet might have been a better choice for the EMR Corby service, but they won't be available soon enough. It needs more electrification to provide a home for them. Eg Nottingham - Sheffield - Leeds. But Grayling messed a that up, sadly.
That's a good point. I wonder if the 350/2 were available sooner, whether they would have moved to EMR instead of the 360/1 units.
 

Doomotron

Member
Joined
25 Jun 2018
Messages
1,187
Location
Kent
Would they be re-classified as 450/2s if they get the shoe gear? Imagine the pantograph could be removed too.
No. They're still dual-voltage units (hence why Electrostars are always 3xx units as the 375s were originally dual-voltage).
They are replacing 319s with 323s and 331s.
323 replacement? Or even a 331 replacement if they do a full Juniper!
 

JonathanH

Veteran Member
Joined
29 May 2011
Messages
18,810
Northern are losing money every day and the 323s are getting old and the 331s are built by CAF. The 350s are some of the most reliable trains in the country.

...and could have lease prices to match.

Swapping 323s and 331s on which Northern's traincrew are already trained for 350s which would need a complete training programme to be undertaken would not be a very good way of addressing Northern's losses.
 

greatvoyager

Established Member
Joined
15 Aug 2019
Messages
2,426
Location
Exeter
No. They're still dual-voltage units (hence why Electrostars are always 3xx units as the 375s were originally dual-voltage).
323 replacement? Or even a 331 replacement if they do a full Juniper!
I meant if they removed the pantograph, as if they go to SWR, it would not be needed.
 

Energy

Established Member
Joined
29 Dec 2018
Messages
4,479
I meant if they removed the pantograph, as if they go to SWR, it would not be needed.
They wouldn't remove the pantograph, it's already been installed, not much point removing it. SWR would be a good place though considering the 442 issues
 

The Ham

Established Member
Joined
6 Jul 2012
Messages
10,326
How about Leeds or York to Newcastle/Central Belt to free up some Voyagers at XC?
 

Doomotron

Member
Joined
25 Jun 2018
Messages
1,187
Location
Kent
How about Leeds or York to Newcastle/Central Belt to free up some Voyagers at XC?
XC wouldn't want to break the services up to use electric trains.
Swapping 323s and 331s on which Northern's traincrew are already trained for 350s which would need a complete training programme to be undertaken would not be a very good way of addressing Northern's losses.
In the event 331s don't last very long (like 332s), they'll need new trains, and they definitely need new trains to replace the 332s.
 

The Ham

Established Member
Joined
6 Jul 2012
Messages
10,326
XC wouldn't want to break the services up to use electric trains.

Why not? If there was a bit of an overlap, with Voyagers. For instance with then running through to Darlington or Middlesbrough. There could be enough to limit the risk of losing passengers due to the split

Especially with the extra capacity that doing so would provide across the rest of the network.

Especially with the potential for there to be 8 coach trains running over the electrified network. These trains which would have seating capacity on a par with a HST, whilst being much cheaper to run (fuel costs, track access charges, etc.) meaning that they wouldn't need to sell as many tickets to cover the basic costs.
 

Doomotron

Member
Joined
25 Jun 2018
Messages
1,187
Location
Kent
Why not? If there was a bit of an overlap, with Voyagers. For instance with then running through to Darlington or Middlesbrough. There could be enough to limit the risk of losing passengers due to the split

Especially with the extra capacity that doing so would provide across the rest of the network.

Especially with the potential for there to be 8 coach trains running over the electrified network. These trains which would have seating capacity on a par with a HST, whilst being much cheaper to run (fuel costs, track access charges, etc.) meaning that they wouldn't need to sell as many tickets to cover the basic costs.
However I doubt the space on the line would be enough for an increased service that, to put it bluntly, only exists because it can.
 

greatvoyager

Established Member
Joined
15 Aug 2019
Messages
2,426
Location
Exeter
They wouldn't remove the pantograph, it's already been installed, not much point removing it. SWR would be a good place though considering the 442 issues
Shoe gear is being removed from some of the 319s which have been converted to 769s, so I wouldn't say it would be out of the question considering little of the SWR network there is OHLE.
 

37057

Member
Joined
3 Jul 2009
Messages
422
It shouldn't be assumed that retro-fitting shoe gear to bogies instantly makes a 350 DC...

It would take a long time to convert the fleet which could potentially rule them out as appropriate for DC operators.
 

Energy

Established Member
Joined
29 Dec 2018
Messages
4,479
It shouldn't be assumed that retro-fitting shoe gear to bogies instantly makes a 350 DC...

It would take a long time to convert the fleet which could potentially rule them out as appropriate for DC operators.
It should be assumed, the /1s spend some time on third rail for a short period at Southern.
 

37057

Member
Joined
3 Jul 2009
Messages
422
It should be assumed, the /1s spend some time on third rail for a short period at Southern.

They're dual voltage (from build) though...

In the real world (not on forum / magazines etc), modifying rolling stock isn't so simple, takes time and funding, the sort of things that affects decisions...

I can tell you that collector shoes are only the tip of the iceberg.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top