tractakid
Member
Here's the brand new version of the fantastic Project Mapping all stations zoomable map.
http://www.projectmapping.co.uk/Resources/TOCs AS v7.2 April 2014.pdf
I have studied the map in a fairly detailed way and have been in contact with the author offering as much constructive criticism as I have been able to come up with. Some of which came from a now locked thread here on RailUK. Lots of these criticisms have been incorporated into the map, and have been gratefully received.
So I was wondering, what is left to change, if anything?
For clear cut 'mistakes or omissions',
1) I have noticed one thing since sending off my last email- Grand Central calling at Mirfield is not shown.
However, I feel there are other topics which are much harder to deal with. These topics can often be considered a can of worms,
1) Limited service- which routes should be omitted entirely, which routes should be shown as limited service, and which routes should be considered full service? Contradictions perhaps include the curve between Mistley and Ipswich being considered full service (Which I disagree with- there are two trains a day in each direction) , whereas Southern's offering round the Sutton Loop is considered limited service (Which I agree with). Should there be a numeric cut off point, or should each section of track be examined on a case by case basis? As for omitting routes- there are a lot of diversionary routes that have a daily/weekly train in the WTT which do not offer new journey opportunities. Should Virgin really be shown to operate via Heald Green, and Alsager, for example?
2) Whether to show a TOC stopping at a certain station. There are some stations that receive a very sparse service from a TOC that usually pass through a station. Examples include Adlington which gets a weekly service from Transpennine Express. There are a lot of stations on the map which show TOCs that make limited calls- like Transpennine Express at Motherwell, and also those that don't, like Transpennine Express at Lostock. These inconsistencies, in my opinion, would best be sorted out, but it's a tough job.
3) The interchange symbol. I am struggling to grasp the logic of where this is used. Why not Stevenage? Why Plymouth, and why Bangor? Is it used simply to highlight important stations, and isn't actually an interchange symbol at all?
This sort of situation is ideal for some superb pedantry (I am a bit of one myself), so do your best people of Railforums!
http://www.projectmapping.co.uk/Resources/TOCs AS v7.2 April 2014.pdf
I have studied the map in a fairly detailed way and have been in contact with the author offering as much constructive criticism as I have been able to come up with. Some of which came from a now locked thread here on RailUK. Lots of these criticisms have been incorporated into the map, and have been gratefully received.
So I was wondering, what is left to change, if anything?
For clear cut 'mistakes or omissions',
1) I have noticed one thing since sending off my last email- Grand Central calling at Mirfield is not shown.
However, I feel there are other topics which are much harder to deal with. These topics can often be considered a can of worms,
1) Limited service- which routes should be omitted entirely, which routes should be shown as limited service, and which routes should be considered full service? Contradictions perhaps include the curve between Mistley and Ipswich being considered full service (Which I disagree with- there are two trains a day in each direction) , whereas Southern's offering round the Sutton Loop is considered limited service (Which I agree with). Should there be a numeric cut off point, or should each section of track be examined on a case by case basis? As for omitting routes- there are a lot of diversionary routes that have a daily/weekly train in the WTT which do not offer new journey opportunities. Should Virgin really be shown to operate via Heald Green, and Alsager, for example?
2) Whether to show a TOC stopping at a certain station. There are some stations that receive a very sparse service from a TOC that usually pass through a station. Examples include Adlington which gets a weekly service from Transpennine Express. There are a lot of stations on the map which show TOCs that make limited calls- like Transpennine Express at Motherwell, and also those that don't, like Transpennine Express at Lostock. These inconsistencies, in my opinion, would best be sorted out, but it's a tough job.
3) The interchange symbol. I am struggling to grasp the logic of where this is used. Why not Stevenage? Why Plymouth, and why Bangor? Is it used simply to highlight important stations, and isn't actually an interchange symbol at all?
This sort of situation is ideal for some superb pedantry (I am a bit of one myself), so do your best people of Railforums!
