• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Rail strikes discussion

Status
Not open for further replies.

320320

Member
Joined
5 Jun 2015
Messages
360
No it's not a closed shop, quite true. I have been approached this week by a few of the newer staff worried about going to work next Tuesday in case nobody talks to them, I just tell them turn up if you wish. And to be fair, everyone has told them the same.

You should’ve told them that the majority of their colleagues won’t support them in future if they find themselves in need of union assistance and let them know the reality of deciding to work through a strike.

They‘d be as well saving themselves the union fees in the meantime.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Clip

Established Member
Joined
28 Jun 2010
Messages
10,822
Then don’t join the union then, simple really!
You freely joined a union, if you do not agree with what is democratically voted on then you are free to leave. Their is no gun to your head.
This is rather unfair - Unions are for all the workforce and its inevitable that people will have differing opinions about things and they also have a democratic right to vote how they see fit and if they dont think now is the right time to strike for one reason or another then that is their right to do so and they shouldn't be bullied or have scathing remarks made to them either at work or on a forum - and telling people to leave just because they dont agree with the strike is shocking behaviour
 

Monty

Established Member
Joined
12 Jun 2012
Messages
2,368
What about those that didn't vote for strike action?

What will say on the matter is that you have to accept the democratic process even if you didn't vote for it. Most of the ballots have had voter turnouts and mandates that politicians would kill for.

But as someone has already mentioned I do question the wisdom of joining a union if only to reap the benefits and not strike when things go the otherway.
 

175001

On Moderation
Joined
3 Feb 2007
Messages
1,360
Location
Between Heaven and Hell
The railways are subsidised to the tune of over £600 a year per household, Given most people do not use the railways that's a crazy level of subsidy.
This flight to Rwanda tonight is costing up to £500k. And that's just ONE flight.

Guess who's subsidising that????

Makes a mockery of your point.
 

Gems

Member
Joined
10 Nov 2018
Messages
656
Do you mean joint negotiations?
Basically. They didn't want to offer the rest of the staff anything like that. So had to write out collective bargaining. It got voted out mostly by the west side.. But I remember sitting in the messroom and many drivers gloating over it. They didn't care their colleagues would loose out. So I don't much care about drivers terms and conditions.
 

exbrel

Member
Joined
24 Aug 2018
Messages
195
Don't forget it'll be significantly less this year with him losing a day's pay every strike date. Oh wait...
if the union wins its strike action will mr lynce's pay rise, and would he be eligible for a productivity bonus?
 

Gems

Member
Joined
10 Nov 2018
Messages
656
This flight to Rwanda tonight is costing up to £500k. And that's just ONE flight.

Guess who's subsidising that????

Makes a mockery of your point.
From the number of expected passengers. I would guess 'TUI'
 

91108

Member
Joined
2 Oct 2019
Messages
75
Location
Europe
What about those that didn't vote for strike action?
I didn’t vote for Brexit or this Conservative government, but I have to suffer both, it’s called democracy.
A member of rail staff who doesn’t vote for strike action has to accept the outcome or leave the union and work on strike days as a matter of their own principle.
They do actually have the bonus of a choice unlike actual elections.
 

ainsworth74

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Global Moderator
Joined
16 Nov 2009
Messages
29,234
Location
Redcar
Just a note to say that any strike timetables that are published need to be posted in a separate thread, most likely by TOC, as w they will not be the subject of this thread. There's quite enough here already without also trying to cram in timetable discussions for every single TOC in the country!
 

wobman

Established Member
Joined
2 Jan 2011
Messages
1,233
Basically. They didn't want to offer the rest of the staff anything like that. So had to write out collective bargaining. It got voted out mostly by the west side.. But I remember sitting in the messroom and many drivers gloating over it. They didn't care their colleagues would loose out. So I don't much care about drivers terms and conditions.
We're all drivers in that messroom gloating as you claim or the vocal minority which you get in every workplace ?

I work with people that gloat about stuff, but I don't think everyone in the dept think the same.

The Northern harmonisation package was very complicated & there were some winners but many losers in that deal, that's why it didn't get accepted.
 

Gems

Member
Joined
10 Nov 2018
Messages
656
You should’ve told them that the majority of their colleagues won’t support them in future if they find themselves in need of union assistance and let them know the reality of deciding to work through a strike.

They‘d be as well saving themselves the union fees in the meantime.
Honestly. I'm not trying to be argumentative here. I get the point you are trying to make... But in my experience I would rather have my pet pooch represent me than some of the reps I have seen in action.
 

kristiang85

Established Member
Joined
23 Jan 2018
Messages
2,712
You should’ve told them that the majority of their colleagues won’t support them in future if they find themselves in need of union assistance and let them know the reality of deciding to work through a strike.

They‘d be as well saving themselves the union fees in the meantime.

As someone not working in the railways, this sounds like a rather unpleasant working environment to be in, I must say. Just saying that as an outsider.

In my work we have unions; I'm not a member and I don't join strikes (university sector ones), but I've never had any kind of resentment from anybody for that. I think for those who defend the right to strike, they should also recognise the right *not* to strike, especially as striking does carry a financial penalty.
 
Last edited:

Bertie the bus

Established Member
Joined
15 Aug 2014
Messages
3,032
But as someone has already mentioned I do question the wisdom of joining a union if only to reap the benefits and not strike when things go the otherway.
To be fair, they didn't say that. Someone has just twisted their words to suggest that is what they said when what they really said was the only reason they would join a union is for help in a dispute but if that meant having to strike they wouldn't join. They did not say they would join for the benefits but not go on strike.
 

Efini92

Established Member
Joined
14 Dec 2016
Messages
2,002
Basically. They didn't want to offer the rest of the staff anything like that. So had to write out collective bargaining. It got voted out mostly by the west side.. But I remember sitting in the messroom and many drivers gloating over it. They didn't care their colleagues would loose out. So I don't much care about drivers terms and conditions.
In fairness I think it was your depot (I’m guessing Leeds) that stopped the deal going through.
There is that arrogance on both sides. I remember once of the RMT company council reps telling their members to vote for a deal, telling them I’d ASLEF get any more (they were balloting) they would get the increase as well.
 

320320

Member
Joined
5 Jun 2015
Messages
360
As someone not working in the railways, this sounds like a rather unpleasant working environment to be in, I must say. Just saying that as an outsider.

In my work we have unions; I'm not a member and I don't join strikes (university sector ones), but I've never had any kind of resentment from anybody for that. I think for those who defend the right to strike, they should also recognise the right *not* to strike, especially as striking does carry a financial penalty.

NOBODY is forced to join a union. NOBODY is forced to go on strike. IF you want to join a union then you do so in the knowledge that you should abide by the result of a democrat ballot of the members.

If you don’t want to abide decisions you don’t agree with then don’t join the union, nobody’s going to make your life a misery for it.
 
Last edited:

Bluejays

Member
Joined
19 Sep 2017
Messages
570
I fully respect the right of any non union member not to strike, it would not affect my view of them in the slightest. Especially with the characters that run the rmt I can understand why lots of people want nothing to do with them as an.organisation.

Union members who don't strike is different for me though. Fundamentally I believe in democracy, if you join a democratic organisation then you abide by the majority decision. If you're not willing to abide by the democratic mandate then you should not have joined in the first place.
 

baz962

Established Member
Joined
8 Jun 2017
Messages
3,553
Basically. They didn't want to offer the rest of the staff anything like that. So had to write out collective bargaining. It got voted out mostly by the west side.. But I remember sitting in the messroom and many drivers gloating over it. They didn't care their colleagues would loose out. So I don't much care about drivers terms and conditions.
So you tar all drivers with the same brush.
 

Kite159

Veteran Member
Joined
27 Jan 2014
Messages
20,813
Location
West of Andover
NOBODY is forced to join a union. NOBODY is forced to go on strike. IF you want to join a union then you do so in the knowledge that you should abide by the result of a democrat ballot of the members.

If you don’t want to abide decisions you don’t agree with then don’t join the union, nobodies going to make your life a misery for it.
Although from what it sounds like if any non union members goes into work on a strike day they will be treated like they have the plague by others
 

320320

Member
Joined
5 Jun 2015
Messages
360
To be fair, they didn't say that. Someone has just twisted their words to suggest that is what they said when what they really said was the only reason they would join a union is for help in a dispute but if that meant having to strike they wouldn't join. They did not say they would join for the benefits but not go on strike.

So they’d join a union if they needed help in a dispute but they wouldn’t strike in the event of a ballot to do so.

What exactly are they going to do if the dispute involved them losing their job? Would they expect other union members to partake in industrial action in order to save them losing their job when they, admittedly, wouldn’t go on strike themselves?

That’s an incredibly selfish and indefensible attitude towards union membership.

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==

Although from what it sounds like if any non union members goes into work on a strike day they will be treated like they have the plague by others

I haven’t saw anything posted on here suggesting that.
 

L401CJF

Established Member
Joined
16 Oct 2019
Messages
1,486
Location
Wirral
In a previous place of employment (none railway), there was a strike ballot over pay which came back overwhelmingly as a yes to strike.

I personally was in the union, and voted not against, but I went with the action anyway. The union where giving us some payments to cover the lost wages but it was nowhere near the lost wages and a real struggle to make ends meet.

Some colleagues were even loaning money to others who were struggling so they didnt cross the picket line.

There were a handful who did cross the line. They became known as scabs and got a lot of abuse for it. 3 of them resigned soon after. A couple stayed and still 5 years later arnt really spoken to, and won't go into canteen/messrooms.

I do see it from multiple sides, but the abuse for those who cross the line is certainly very real!
 

miklcct

On Moderation
Joined
2 May 2021
Messages
5,017
Location
Cricklewood
People keep saying this but this is a Tory government with an 80 seat majority. They can do this right now if they wanted, but they don't. Loads of us have what appear to be better conditions than unionised industries without union representation. I've never worked in a unionised job and my pay and conditions have only ever got better over the years. If a company starts doing something I don't like or doesn't pay enough, I leave and get a different job, simple as that.
Railway staff isn't a job where one can just jump and switch jobs at his own will, unlike e.g. software developer.

For example, a railway signaller has no choices except working for Network Rail, London Underground, or the other very few railway companies in the UK and Ireland.

This is why unions and workers right are needed as there is an imbalance between employers and employees for this particular career.
 

Bertie the bus

Established Member
Joined
15 Aug 2014
Messages
3,032
So they’d join a union if they needed help in a dispute but they wouldn’t strike in the event of a ballot to do so.

What exactly are they going to do if the dispute involved them losing their job? Would they expect other union members to partake in industrial action in order to save them losing their job when they, admittedly, wouldn’t go on strike themselves?

That’s an incredibly selfish and indefensible attitude towards union membership.
I'd love to know your reasons for joining a union. Totally altruistic I'm sure and not because you gain any benefit.
 

ar10642

Member
Joined
10 Aug 2015
Messages
576
I fully respect the right of any non union member not to strike, it would not affect my view of them in the slightest. Especially with the characters that run the rmt I can understand why lots of people want nothing to do with them as an.organisation.

Union members who don't strike is different for me though. Fundamentally I believe in democracy, if you join a democratic organisation then you abide by the majority decision. If you're not willing to abide by the democratic mandate then you should not have joined in the first place.
That sounds like a reasonable position to me.
 

Caaardiff

Member
Joined
9 Jun 2019
Messages
1,109
So why not give a solution to this problem?
What I've read is the usual rants about railway staff earn too much but bus drivers don't earn enough etc.
I have a friend who was a bus driver it took him 2 weeks of training then he was out driving, a train conductor takes 3 months. A train driver takes a year of training, these are not like for like comparisons you state.

I'm amazed you begrudge a cleaner earning £20k, they should earn more not less.
Are you saying that cleaners will be on the same wage as customer service & station staff? Because that was my point. I didn't begrudge anyone getting paid what they do but I was highliting perspective. How many cleaners get £20k or more in other industries?

Also I notice TfW are one of the few TOCs not striking. Didnt they agree 3-3.5% payrise? What's different in Wales that only allows that? Again, perspective....
 

Towers

Established Member
Joined
30 Aug 2021
Messages
2,588
Location
UK
In a previous place of employment (none railway), there was a strike ballot over pay which came back overwhelmingly as a yes to strike.

I personally was in the union, and voted not against, but I went with the action anyway. The union where giving us some payments to cover the lost wages but it was nowhere near the lost wages and a real struggle to make ends meet.

Some colleagues were even loaning money to others who were struggling so they didnt cross the picket line.

There were a handful who did cross the line. They became known as scabs and got a lot of abuse for it. 3 of them resigned soon after. A couple stayed and still 5 years later arnt really spoken to, and won't go into canteen/messrooms.

I do see it from multiple sides, but the abuse for those who cross the line is certainly very real!
I think there is a very big difference between a one off bout of industrial action at a workplace where it is likely to be very rare, and the sort of situation we are expecting to see on the railway over coming months where you have a union that appears to be on the verge of a strike somewhere all the time, and the action is expected to be prolonged perhaps for months. The simple reality is that many folk cannot afford to lose a few days' wages on a semi-regular basis all through the summer, and whether others like it or not there will be staff coming to work. If it turns out to be a lengthy dispute I rather suspect those who stick it out to the bitter end will see a significant loss of support as strike dates are repeatedly announced. Financial support from the union is likely to be minimal or absebt, owing to the huge numbers being asked to take action.
 

skyhigh

Established Member
Joined
14 Sep 2014
Messages
6,392
Also I notice TfW are one of the few TOCs not striking. Didnt they agree 3-3.5% payrise? What's different in Wales that only allows that?
So far the offer to anyone at my TOC has been 0% and I hear it's the same elsewhere. So I'm assuming the government is the crucial difference (see also: Scotrail)
 

320320

Member
Joined
5 Jun 2015
Messages
360
I'd love to know your reasons for joining a union. Totally altruistic I'm sure and not because you gain any benefit.

I’ll guarantee you one thing. It wasn’t to take advantage of my colleagues and then shaft them as soon as I didn’t like a ballot result.
 

LAX54

Established Member
Joined
15 Jan 2008
Messages
3,870
So what exactly are you saying? That it will affect ROCs too? Well I suggest you go on strike then.
They are, it will affect small boxes and large ROCs and PSB's, but there are a lot of non union staff these days, so depending on how many go to work......
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top