• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

RailSail Irish Rail issued ticket - valid on Tube?

Status
Not open for further replies.

radamfi

Established Member
Joined
29 Oct 2009
Messages
9,267
I've got a handwritten CIV RailSail ticket from Dublin to Brighton. Is it valid on the Tube to cross London?

I know if I had got a ticket issued by a GB TOC it would be on orange stock with a plus sign on it so there would be no debate.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

yorkie

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Administrator
Joined
6 Jun 2005
Messages
67,843
Location
Yorkshire
Yes it is, but some LU barrier staff may throw a wobbler. Is Thameslink running on the date you are travelling?
 

radamfi

Established Member
Joined
29 Oct 2009
Messages
9,267
Yes it is, but some LU barrier staff may throw a wobbler. Is Thameslink running on the date you are travelling?

That day is today so yes it is running, but I fancy using Gatwick Express to Gatwick for novelty value as I usually travel with a Network Railcard meaning I can't normally use it.
--- old post above --- --- new post below ---
I didn't even get past the barrier at Euston Underground station. He told me to apply for a refund. I'd like to see the huge roars of laughter at Irish Rail customer services was I to invoice them for the £1.90 Oyster single. Presumably anyone arriving with any kind of handwritten ticket would encounter the same.
 
Last edited:

Daniel

Established Member
Joined
5 Oct 2005
Messages
2,532
Location
London
He meant apply for a refund from London Underground customer services.
 

transportphoto

Established Member
Associate Staff
Quizmaster
Joined
21 Jan 2010
Messages
4,585
He meant apply for a refund from London Underground customer services.

Yes - best way to get a cash refund would be to send a letter to LUL quoting the oyster card number and enclosing a photocopy of the train ticket.

Requesting that staff are briefed on all tickets that may be coming through their ticket barriers. And, if you so wish, for a reasonable admin fee to cover your inconvenience and your fee's contacting them to gain said refund. :)
 

radamfi

Established Member
Joined
29 Oct 2009
Messages
9,267
What would the point be in LUL refusing the ticket only to get a refund from the same organisation?

He told me to get an Oyster Card transaction print out so he couldn't have meant LUL as they would have that information anyay.

Going through Victoria was a waste of time anyway as GEx was an 8 coach 377 from platform 17!
 

Daniel

Established Member
Joined
5 Oct 2005
Messages
2,532
Location
London
What would the point be in LUL refusing the ticket only to get a refund from the same organisation?

LU refuse the ticket and tell you to buy a new ticket.

LU Cust. Serv. check and find your original ticket was in fact valid.

LU refund the ticket they told you to buy.
 

paul1609

Established Member
Joined
28 Jan 2006
Messages
7,245
Location
Wittersham Kent
I was told by a TFL manager that their cross london agreement with ATOC only covers printed tickets with the + symbol. Any other tickets are invalid. I think this came in around 2004.
 

transportphoto

Established Member
Associate Staff
Quizmaster
Joined
21 Jan 2010
Messages
4,585
Just out of general interest - could you upload a scan of the ticket for me redamfi:?:
 

radamfi

Established Member
Joined
29 Oct 2009
Messages
9,267
Yes - but we believe that it was valid

I believe it is valid too but my point was that the barrier man must have been asking me to request a refund from the train organisation because it was invalid for the Tube. It wouldn't make sense for him to ask me to get a refund from LUL as that would contradict himself. I believe he was suggesting that the train organisation was in the 'wrong' by selling the ticket.
--- old post above --- --- new post below ---
Pics of ticket:

https://docs.google.com/leaf?id=0B-...JkZjgtMjA3OTNiZjhlYmJk&hl=en&authkey=CJSAz6sB

https://docs.google.com/leaf?id=0B-...FkZWEtMzVlYzMwMTY5Zjgx&hl=en&authkey=CMaR7boB
 

glynn80

Established Member
Joined
1 Jun 2008
Messages
1,666
I was told by a TFL manager that their cross london agreement with ATOC only covers printed tickets with the + symbol. Any other tickets are invalid. I think this came in around 2004.

The relevant wording of that agreement is as follows:

THROUGH TICKETING (NON-TRAVELCARD) AGREEMENT 2000 said:
CROSS-LONDON TICKETS

7.1 Where an Operator or an agent of any or all of the Operators issues a Cross-London Ticket, interchange by Underground or Stationlink Bus Service is included in the cost of such tickets. The provisions of this Clause 7.1 shall apply to tickets issued for journeys between any such station and Waterloo International for further travel by European Passenger Services Limited. TTL shall honour Cross-London Tickets for travel on Underground or Stationlink Bus Services and in recognition of the value of such travel, TTL shall receive from RSP in accordance with the LRT/RSP Clearance Agreement an annual payment as set out in the Operating Schedule.

As far as I can tell there is nothing mentioning a requirement for the + symbol, neither within the extract above or the document as a whole.

I did also check the ATOC-LRT Agreement which brings together the Through Ticketing (Non-Travelcard) Agreement, Travelcard Agreement and Concessionary Travel Agreement and again no mention of the + symbol occurs.
 

radamfi

Established Member
Joined
29 Oct 2009
Messages
9,267
I was told by a TFL manager that their cross london agreement with ATOC only covers printed tickets with the + symbol. Any other tickets are invalid. I think this came in around 2004.

If that's the case then ATOC and Irish Rail RailSail tickets aren't equivalent!

I wonder what ones issued at the harbour look like?

With the current exchange rate it is slightly dearer from Irish Rail yet has (apparently) less validity!

I thought it was amusing that the guy in Dublin Connolly thought it was OK to merely cross out 'London' and write 'Brighton' and not throw it away and issue a new ticket! I warned him that grippers in GB can be quite strict but that didn't make any difference.
 

yorkie

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Administrator
Joined
6 Jun 2005
Messages
67,843
Location
Yorkshire
The barrier staff told me it wasn't valid.
There are a few exceptions (no names mentioned!) who are brilliant, but let's just say I wouldn't trust many of them to determine if a ticket is valid or not. In fact, to nick a quote from Red Dwarf, "I wouldn't trust them to open a can of sardines that was already open".
I was told by a TFL manager that their cross london agreement with ATOC only covers printed tickets with the + symbol. Any other tickets are invalid. I think this came in around 2004.
Some TfL managers aren't exactly knowledgeable, I would give examples but I don't want to get my informants into trouble!

Routeing Guide said:
In some instances (particularly long distance cross country journeys) the
Manual will show an "any permitted" fare but without the via London, Maltese
cross symbol. Reference to Section C (the “yellow pages”) may show via
London to be a permitted route for this journey and in such instances travel
via London to include cross-London transfer would be permitted.
I know this ticket is shown to have a Maltese cross so not quite the scenario described above, but it demonstrates that barrier staff or managers who make such claims are wrong.

When I am doing such journeys, I prepare myself for a 'discussion' where you need to be assertive. Where it is possible to avoid such discussions by avoiding barriers, I will do that, as I'd rather not argue with them.

It's not totally their fault; the training is pretty poor in this area. In fact, that's an understatement: it's almost non-existent!

Anyway I'd encourage the OP to get a refund from LU, because they think they can just charge people willy nilly and get away with it. They receive a huge amount of money to carry passengers on these tickets, yet try to get out of carrying them at every opportunity. It'll cost them more to deal with the complaint/refund too.
 

Mojo

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Administrator
Joined
7 Aug 2005
Messages
20,400
Location
0035
Might also encourage LU to take it up with the cowboy rail operators issuing problematic tickets too.

One of the issues is that the agreement is between Transport Trading Limited (TfL) and the Tocs whereas bar the very small number of tickets used on DLR the main problems with such tickets occur on London Underground.
 

radamfi

Established Member
Joined
29 Oct 2009
Messages
9,267
Might also encourage LU to take it up with the cowboy rail operators issuing problematic tickets too.

Does Irish Rail count as a 'cowboy rail operator'? :lol:

It does seem fairer to ask for a refund from LUL rather than Irish Rail. Not sure how Irish Rail would entertain the refund even if they wanted to. Would they convert the £1.90 into euros and give me Irish Rail Vouchers, if such a thing exists? Doesn't sound very likely! A lot of fuss for £1.90 but I am inclined to put in the refund request to LUL just to see what happens.

It might be worth mentioning to those intending to buy RailSail tickets in Dublin that the ticket office at Dublin Connolly is only open 0630 to 1900. They seem to be going down the same route of cutting down of ticket office hours in favour of machines. RailSail is not available from the machines.
 
Last edited:

yorkie

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Administrator
Joined
6 Jun 2005
Messages
67,843
Location
Yorkshire
Does Irish Rail count as a 'cowboy rail operator'? :lol:
Probably, but that's subjective!

That said, you are much less likely to experience nasty or rude staff over there (either side of the border). In fact, it can take you aback how nice everyone is.

I did once encounter a guard telling someone off for doubling-back. The customer pointed out that there were no direct trains for several hours, and the guard just left it at that.

In NI in particular they are very friendly, in my experience.
It does seem fairer to ask for a refund from LUL rather than Irish Rail. Not sure how Irish Rail would entertain the refund even if they wanted to. Would they convert the £1.90 into euros and give me Irish Rail Vouchers, if such a thing exists? Doesn't sound very likely! A lot of fuss for £1.90 but I am inclined to put in the refund request to LUL just to see what happens.
There is no question the refund must be obtained from LUL. Unless I was in a rush I'd be politely but assertively refusing to pay and insisting on being allowed travel. Done it before with an obstructive barrier person, and his colleague said "he's right, let him through" after I showed the relevant documentation from the Routeing Guide. That was at King's Cross. At Paddington there was no argument as back then there was a barrier between certain platforms that you could easily get round.

The ticket was Grantham to Stroud which used to permit travel via London, sadly this no longer does. I had reservations via London and guards correctly accepted it on EC/FGW. I had anticipated someone at the barrier throwing a wobbler but I got us through :) You can't be rude though, you have to be assertive.
It might be worth mentioning to those intending to buy RailSail tickets in Dublin that the ticket office at Dublin Connolly is only open 0630 to 1900. They seem to be going down the same route of cutting down of ticket office hours in favour of machines. RailSail is not available from the machines.
They are making several of the same mistakes that we are making, but I won't go into detail as it's not applicable to this topic.
 

Daniel

Established Member
Joined
5 Oct 2005
Messages
2,532
Location
London
I believe it is valid too but my point was that the barrier man must have been asking me to request a refund from the train organisation because it was invalid for the Tube. It wouldn't make sense for him to ask me to get a refund from LUL as that would contradict himself. I believe he was suggesting that the train organisation was in the 'wrong' by selling the ticket.

The barrier man would not have been telling you to request a refund from Irish Rail. He would have been suggestion you request a refund from LU Customer Services. A man on the gateline does not have the ability to probe deeply the validity of a ticket. Customer services do. Therefore, if a staff member is doubtful of the vadility, I don't see a problem in asking the passenger to buy a new ticket, and once the original is found to be valid, issue a refund and an apology. It's inconvenient to the passenger and some may disagree with doing that, but im sure you'll agree that it's better than point blank rejecting the ticket.


LU refuse the ticket and tell you to buy a new ticket.

LU Cust. Serv. check and find your original ticket was in fact valid.

LU refund the ticket they told you to buy.
 

sheff1

Established Member
Joined
24 Dec 2009
Messages
5,496
Location
Sheffield
Therefore, if a staff member is doubtful of the vadility, I don't see a problem in asking the passenger to buy a new ticket, and once the original is found to be valid, issue a refund and an apology. It's inconvenient to the passenger and some may disagree with doing that, but im sure you'll agree that it's better than point blank rejecting the ticket.

I do disagree. Why should passengers be inconvenienced because someone checking tickets doesn't understand what they are looking at ? Actually, being charged again is rather more than an inconvenience - it is closer to being accused of trying to use a ticket unlawfully.
 
Last edited:

Daniel

Established Member
Joined
5 Oct 2005
Messages
2,532
Location
London
I do disagree. Why should passengers be inconvenienced because someone checking tickets doesn't understand what they are looking at ?

I didn't say it is the ideal situation. Considering London Undergrounds training does not cover national rail tickets, as a member of gateline staff, I see it logical to advise the customer to purchase a new ticket, and when the original is found to be valid, a refund and apology issued.

It is not the ideal situation, and it is an inconvenience to the customer - however it is something that should be dealt with by LU as a company, with regards to training. As a member of staff on the gateline, who has no impact on training and whose suggestions are not listened too, I feel comfortable in rejecting a ticket and advising that the customer contacts the CSC to confirm the vadility and issue a refund.

3 facts:

1). Part of my job description is to "protect revenue on the gateline"
2). I do not personally feel I recieve adequate training on non-LUL issued tickets
3). There is no place we can go to check a vadility whilst on the gateline.

Considering those 3 things I believe I would have acted in the same manner. I do not feel it is the best for the customer. But with the situation you find yourself in when working on the barrier, this is how it has to be.
 

sheff1

Established Member
Joined
24 Dec 2009
Messages
5,496
Location
Sheffield
I understand completely what you are saying and my comment was not aimed at individuals. Certainly, if I was ever prevented from using a valid ticket in this way, I would take the matter up via my MP making exactly the points you make.
 

Daniel

Established Member
Joined
5 Oct 2005
Messages
2,532
Location
London
I understand completely what you are saying and my comment was not aimed at individuals. Certainly, if I was ever prevented from using a valid ticket in this way, I would take the matter up via my MP making exactly the points you make.

Apologies for taking it slightly personally.
It is an issue that annoys me; I know about NR ticketing more than most LU staff, but without adequate training on vadilities, I can't do my job properly. We don't have access t "The Manual", and IIRC the only tickets we are taught about somewhat more in-depth are "SDR"'s, "CDR"'s, (yes I know they don't exist!), and Boundary Zone Extentions.

I do, however, encourage people to complain to customer services whenever they find an issue with staff training. Feedback from staff is ignored. A complaint from a customer can't be shoved aside - everything is investigated! I have a complaint on my file from withdrawing an invalid pass. It was invalid, but the customer complained, it was still investigated and placed on my file.

Even during breakdowns in the service - if no-one bothers to call up the CSC, it gets written down as "no customer complaints"...
 

radamfi

Established Member
Joined
29 Oct 2009
Messages
9,267
Having travelled on buses and trains extensively throughout much of western Europe I don't think British transport staff are any less knowledgeable on tickets than in other countries. But the main difference I find is that if a continental bus driver/train guard doesn't know the ticket, he just accepts it. Over here, if he doesn't know the ticket, the default reaction is to refuse it. If you then argue a bit and sound knowledgeable then they sometimes 'let you off', but I have found that to be less likely these days.
 

route101

Established Member
Joined
16 May 2010
Messages
10,625
I believe it is valid too but my point was that the barrier man must have been asking me to request a refund from the train organisation because it was invalid for the Tube. It wouldn't make sense for him to ask me to get a refund from LUL as that would contradict himself. I believe he was suggesting that the train organisation was in the 'wrong' by selling the ticket.
--- old post above --- --- new post below ---
Pics of ticket:

https://docs.google.com/leaf?id=0B-...JkZjgtMjA3OTNiZjhlYmJk&hl=en&authkey=CJSAz6sB

https://docs.google.com/leaf?id=0B-...FkZWEtMzVlYzMwMTY5Zjgx&hl=en&authkey=CMaR7boB

Great Ticket , reminds me of the tickets i get in Eastern Europe . I wonder if you can get them in the UK?
 

yorkie

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Administrator
Joined
6 Jun 2005
Messages
67,843
Location
Yorkshire
Great Ticket , reminds me of the tickets i get in Eastern Europe . I wonder if you can get them in the UK?
Having looked at the ticket, the solution is simple. All the issuer had to do was write "Route: +Irish Ferries" on it somewhere. It would then have the magical + symbol and would be valid. The barrier staff would not have thrown a wobbler and radamfi would not have been overcharged, and everyone would have lived happily ever after ;)
 

wintonian

Established Member
Joined
15 Jan 2010
Messages
4,889
Location
Hampshire
Untill they say that they only accept ticket that go through the barriers or Oyster. ;)
 

island

Veteran Member
Joined
30 Dec 2010
Messages
16,132
Location
0036
It does seem fairer to ask for a refund from LUL rather than Irish Rail. Not sure how Irish Rail would entertain the refund even if they wanted to. Would they convert the £1.90 into euros and give me Irish Rail Vouchers, if such a thing exists? Doesn't sound very likely! A lot of fuss for £1.90 but I am inclined to put in the refund request to LUL just to see what happens.

They'd probably give you a €5 voucher because they don't print them on demand, they just get batches of them printed in fixed denominations and post them out, rounded up, where someone makes a claim.
 

paul_l

Member
Joined
23 Sep 2009
Messages
28
I used the same type of ticket last year when returning to Woking from Dublin, after the ash cloud cancelled my return flight. I had to explain the ticket briefly at the Euston LU barrier, and I had no problem getting out at Waterloo.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top