• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Rename Deansgate?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Bletchleyite

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Oct 2014
Messages
104,539
Location
"Marston Vale mafia"
Deansgate does seem to suffer from a bit of "under-awareness" of its location and places it is particularly convenient for. For example, it's a relatively easy walk up Deansgate itself to reach the Kendals/King Street shopping area.

What also doesn't help this is not everything stopping, e.g. trains from the Bolton direction are only about 50/50 stopping and non-stopping. So people might get off if the train just happens to stop, but will travel back from another station for a greater choice of services.

Yes, true, though it depends on your origin (all of the 1990s Southport service stopped there, so if you were coming from Burscough Bridge, say, that wouldn't be a concern). If Castlefield goes the "S-Bahn" route, stopping everything makes more sense.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Fokx

Member
Joined
18 May 2020
Messages
721
Location
Liverpool
Deansgate does seem to suffer from a bit of "under-awareness" of its location and places it is particularly convenient for. For example, it's a relatively easy walk up Deansgate itself to reach the Kendals/King Street shopping area.

What also doesn't help this is not everything stopping, e.g. trains from the Bolton direction are only about 50/50 stopping and non-stopping. So people might get off if the train just happens to stop, but will travel back from another station for a greater choice of services.

I disagree slightly with that as the market for Deansgate is largely for the nearby offices, music venues and theatre, NOT for shopping in King Street or the long dying department store. Salford Central and Victoria are much closer and more widely used for this purpose

It actually suffers from poor location. It might be a station you get off at to go shopping or run errands, but once you’ve been shopping in central Manchester you aren’t going to walk a mile back to Deansgate for your train, more likely just head to Piccadilly or Victoria, it’s primary function is tram connections, local employment and the nearby leisure attractions
 

Purple Orange

On Moderation
Joined
26 Dec 2019
Messages
3,458
Location
The North
I disagree slightly with that as the market for Deansgate is largely for the nearby offices, music venues and theatre, NOT for shopping in King Street or the long dying department store. Salford Central and Victoria are much closer and more widely used for this purpose

It actually suffers from poor location. It might be a station you get off at to go shopping or run errands, but once you’ve been shopping in central Manchester you aren’t going to walk a mile back to Deansgate for your train, more likely just head to Piccadilly or Victoria, it’s primary function is tram connections, local employment and the nearby leisure attractions

That makes it a good location for those functions. City centres are far more than shops. I use Deansgate for work, if I want to go to Castlefield, any of the bars/restaurants at the western end of Deansgate, Peter Street, Quay Street, the Museum of Science & Industry, Opera House, the Factory when it opens. No other station is better for those locations. The whole line needs to be all stop services really.
 

Greybeard33

Established Member
Joined
18 Feb 2012
Messages
4,335
Location
Greater Manchester
That makes it a good location for those functions. City centres are far more than shops. I use Deansgate for work, if I want to go to Castlefield, any of the bars/restaurants at the western end of Deansgate, Peter Street, Quay Street, the Museum of Science & Industry, Opera House, the Factory when it opens. No other station is better for those locations. The whole line needs to be all stop services really.
I take the opposite view. Deansgate station should be closed. Manchester does not need three stations on the same line in less than a mile. It is less than 10 minutes walk from Oxford Road.

Deansgate contributes to the Castlefield corridor congestion. It is too close to Castlefield Junction. Non-stop trains can pass through the flat junction at line speed, whereas stopping trains occupy the junction longer and so restrict the corridor capacity.

If the station were closed, there would be no need to argue over its name!
 

daodao

Established Member
Joined
6 Feb 2016
Messages
3,334
Location
Dunham/Bowdon
I take the opposite view. Deansgate station should be closed. Manchester does not need three stations on the same line in less than a mile. It is less than 10 minutes walk from Oxford Road.

Deansgate contributes to the Castlefield corridor congestion. It is too close to Castlefield Junction. Non-stop trains can pass through the flat junction at line speed, whereas stopping trains occupy the junction longer and so restrict the corridor capacity.

If the station were closed, there would be no need to argue over its name!
Deansgate is a useful station, but would be more useful if all trains stopped there with regular interval frequencies (minimum every 30 minutes for each route). The long-distance TPE and TfW services should be banished from the Castlefield line.
 

Mcr Warrior

Veteran Member
Joined
8 Jan 2009
Messages
14,793
Looks like the location of Deansgate has been moved according to this Northern timetable...

https://d11vpqhghel6qd.cloudfront.n...ster-airport-local-stopping-services-3999.pdf
Deansgate contributes to the Castlefield corridor congestion. It is too close to Castlefield Junction.

As per my previous post, Northern look to have fixed the problem of Deansgate being too close to Castlefield Junction.

"Manchester Sackville Street" the new name now, perhaps? :)
 

Fokx

Member
Joined
18 May 2020
Messages
721
Location
Liverpool
Deansgate is a useful station, but would be more useful if all trains stopped there with regular interval frequencies (minimum every 30 minutes for each route). The long-distance TPE and TfW services should be banished from the Castlefield line.

The long-distance services you’ve listed are ones that connect to Manchester Airport, where most of the traffic on those routes passes to. You’d be surprised how many passengers travel from Wales, Scotland, the Lake District and Yorkshire because of the options of direct flights which are frequently cheaper to travel to/from or more convenient.

It’s easier to send them via Castlefield then it is to approach from Piccadilly East, reverse in a bay platform and then cross several lines to get to the Airport.

That makes it a good location for those functions. City centres are far more than shops. I use Deansgate for work, if I want to go to Castlefield, any of the bars/restaurants at the western end of Deansgate, Peter Street, Quay Street, the Museum of Science & Industry, Opera House, the Factory when it opens. No other station is better for those locations. The whole line needs to be all stop services really.

Some of those places you’ve listed such as the Opera House and Quay Street are geographically closer to Salford Central
 

Ianno87

Veteran Member
Joined
3 May 2015
Messages
15,214
Some of those places you’ve listed such as the Opera House and Quay Street are geographically closer to Salford Central

Which is useless from the CLC and south of Manchester.
 

Bletchleyite

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Oct 2014
Messages
104,539
Location
"Marston Vale mafia"
The long-distance services you’ve listed are ones that connect to Manchester Airport, where most of the traffic on those routes passes to. You’d be surprised how many passengers travel from Wales, Scotland, the Lake District and Yorkshire because of the options of direct flights which are frequently cheaper to travel to/from or more convenient.

It really doesn't. Manchester itself is a bigger destination.

I'd accept "a significant minority", but "most" is nonsense.
 

Fokx

Member
Joined
18 May 2020
Messages
721
Location
Liverpool
It really doesn't. Manchester itself is a bigger destination.

I'd accept "a significant minority", but "most" is nonsense.

Compared to passengers travelling from the likes of Middlesbrough or Milford Haven to Deansgate/Oxford Rd it certainly is the case
 

Greybeard33

Established Member
Joined
18 Feb 2012
Messages
4,335
Location
Greater Manchester
Compared to passengers travelling from the likes of Middlesbrough or Milford Haven to Deansgate/Oxford Rd it certainly is the case
Trains from Redcar/Middlesbrough do not stop call at Deansgate, while those from S Wales do not even pass through it!
 
Last edited:

Bletchleyite

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Oct 2014
Messages
104,539
Location
"Marston Vale mafia"
Trains from Redcar/Middlesbrough do not stop at Deansgate, while those from S Wales do not even pass through it!

And trains from Milford Haven don't serve Manchester Airport either. Why on earth would you go to Manchester Airport from there? Birmingham is much nearer.

The Airport is a big traffic sink, but not as big as the poster was implying.
 

xotGD

Established Member
Joined
4 Feb 2017
Messages
6,835
Trains from Redcar/Middlesbrough do not stop at Deansgate
Oh, they often stop - waiting for a platform at Oxford Road. In past decades folk might have taken the opportunity to alight, but no such luck these days.
 

Purple Orange

On Moderation
Joined
26 Dec 2019
Messages
3,458
Location
The North
I take the opposite view. Deansgate station should be closed. Manchester does not need three stations on the same line in less than a mile. It is less than 10 minutes walk from Oxford Road.

Deansgate contributes to the Castlefield corridor congestion. It is too close to Castlefield Junction. Non-stop trains can pass through the flat junction at line speed, whereas stopping trains occupy the junction longer and so restrict the corridor capacity.

If the station were closed, there would be no need to argue over its name!

I think you are failing to see the opportunity. Think of Picc P13/14, Oxford Road, Deansgate, Salford Central and Victoria as a metro line (or S-bahn if you like). There should be no long distance services on the line to Scotland or Newcastle. There should be no ‘fasts’ to Liverpool, Leeds or Sheffield. It’s a long term goal and it requires HS2 and NPR to deliver such a proposition.
 

Bletchleyite

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Oct 2014
Messages
104,539
Location
"Marston Vale mafia"
I think you are failing to see the opportunity. Think of Picc P13/14, Oxford Road, Deansgate, Salford Central and Victoria as a metro line (or S-bahn if you like). There should be no long distance services on the line to Scotland or Newcastle. There should be no ‘fasts’ to Liverpool, Leeds or Sheffield. It’s a long term goal and it requires HS2 and NPR to deliver such a proposition.

In essence, I suppose it could be an above ground version of the Merseyrail Northern Line. Which is actually sort of what it was for most of its life - the whole "being everything to everyone" thing is just post Windsor Link (1986?)
 

Purple Orange

On Moderation
Joined
26 Dec 2019
Messages
3,458
Location
The North
Some of those places you’ve listed such as the Opera House and Quay Street are geographically closer to Salford Central

But Salford Central isn’t as useful if you’re coming from the Piccadilly direction. You’d prefer to get off at Deansgate than continue travelling on to Salford Central. Also the Opera House is 0.4 miles to both stations.

In essence, I suppose it could be an above ground version of the Merseyrail Northern Line. Which is actually sort of what it was for most of its life - the whole "being everything to everyone" thing is just post Windsor Link (1986?)

Exactly. Routes using the the line need to be rationalised. Longer, high frequency trains and it should be treated like it is a Merseyrail or London Underground line.
 
Last edited:

Greybeard33

Established Member
Joined
18 Feb 2012
Messages
4,335
Location
Greater Manchester
I think you are failing to see the opportunity. Think of Picc P13/14, Oxford Road, Deansgate, Salford Central and Victoria as a metro line (or S-bahn if you like). There should be no long distance services on the line to Scotland or Newcastle. There should be no ‘fasts’ to Liverpool, Leeds or Sheffield. It’s a long term goal and it requires HS2 and NPR to deliver such a proposition.
I thought we were discussing Deansgate today, not some theoretical S-bahn that might be feasible in 20+ years time, IF the Treasury coughs up £billions for both HS2 and NPR.

BTW, there is no longer a Newcastle service through Deansgate. It now goes to Liverpool via Victoria.
 

Purple Orange

On Moderation
Joined
26 Dec 2019
Messages
3,458
Location
The North
I thought we were discussing Deansgate today, not some theoretical S-bahn that might be feasible in 20+ years time, IF the Treasury coughs up £billions for both HS2 and NPR.

BTW, there is no longer a Newcastle service through Deansgate. It now goes to Liverpool via Victoria.

You raised the possibility of closing Deansgate so I gave you a good reason to why it should not be. Also the Newcastle services also go to the airport. If they have been cancelled due to Covid, it is a temporary measure rather than permanent.
 

Greybeard33

Established Member
Joined
18 Feb 2012
Messages
4,335
Location
Greater Manchester
You raised the possibility of closing Deansgate so I gave you a good reason to why it should not be. Also the Newcastle services also go to the airport. If they have been cancelled due to Covid, it is a temporary measure rather than permanent.
No, you gave me a reason why there might possibly be a case for reopening Deansgate in 2040. :)

Even if/when demand recovers sufficiently to reinstate 4tph between Victoria and Leeds via Diggle, I doubt that more than 1tph will continue to the Airport around the Ordsall Chord. I think it is more likely that 1tph will terminate at Victoria, or be diverted to Piccadilly via Guide Bridge.
 

Purple Orange

On Moderation
Joined
26 Dec 2019
Messages
3,458
Location
The North
No, you gave me a reason why there might possibly be a case for reopening Deansgate in 2040. :)

Even if/when demand recovers sufficiently to reinstate 4tph between Victoria and Leeds via Diggle, I doubt that more than 1tph will continue to the Airport around the Ordsall Chord. I think it is more likely that 1tph will terminate at Victoria, or be diverted to Piccadilly via Guide Bridge.

It could well be the case that only 1 TPE goes around the chord, but that frees up capacity for another service to make that journey. Perhaps a stopper calling at Deansgate! :)
 

xotGD

Established Member
Joined
4 Feb 2017
Messages
6,835
How about:

Deansgate (Not for Deansgate)
Salford Central (For Deansgate)
 

Greybeard33

Established Member
Joined
18 Feb 2012
Messages
4,335
Location
Greater Manchester
It could well be the case that only 1 TPE goes around the chord, but that frees up capacity for another service to make that journey. Perhaps a stopper calling at Deansgate! :)
On the contrary, there was not sufficient capacity through Deansgate for the number of services that were operating pre-Covid. Hence the chronic congestion and dreadful punctuality performance. The North West Performance Recovery Task Force has been working on timetable changes to reduce congestion post-Covid, which is why I think there will not be a return to 2tph on the chord, regardless of operator.

Maybe another part of the solution will be fewer calls at Deansgate. ;)
 

Bletchleyite

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Oct 2014
Messages
104,539
Location
"Marston Vale mafia"
On the contrary, there was not sufficient capacity through Deansgate for the number of services that were operating pre-Covid. Hence the chronic congestion and dreadful punctuality performance. The North West Performance Recovery Task Force has been working on timetable changes to reduce congestion post-Covid, which is why I think there will not be a return to 2tph on the chord, regardless of operator.

Maybe another part of the solution will be fewer calls at Deansgate. ;)

An electrified line built for 1 DMU an hour to run over it. An incredible waste of money and an awful white elephant.

That same money could have done Picc 15/16 and the Oxford Road work.

:(
 

edwin_m

Veteran Member
Joined
21 Apr 2013
Messages
26,748
Location
Nottingham
An electrified line built for 1 DMU an hour to run over it. An incredible waste of money and an awful white elephant.

That same money could have done Picc 15/16 and the Oxford Road work.

:(
To be fair, it's so short that if it hadn't been electrified, the overruns from both junctions would nearly have met in the middle. The cost is more in the impressive but expensive bridge over the Irwell, and all the work that went into mitigating the heritage impacts, leaving the Museum with inevitably reduced rail facilities which have ended up benefiting the travelling public very little. But we mustn't forget that all of this was part of a combined scheme with the Oxford Road and Piccadilly works, the government approved the Curve which was never intended to work on its own, and failed to approve the rest.

Dragging this back towards topic, a re-build of Oxford Road would probably have had a western access from the platforms for emergency exit purposes. Upgrading this to a fully accessible entrance with TVMs and barriers would have shortened the walk to the Deansgate area by several hundred metres, perhaps enough to have closed that station?
 

Bletchleyite

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Oct 2014
Messages
104,539
Location
"Marston Vale mafia"
Dragging this back towards topic, a re-build of Oxford Road would probably have had a western access from the platforms for emergency exit purposes. Upgrading this to a fully accessible entrance with TVMs and barriers would have shortened the walk to the Deansgate area by several hundred metres, perhaps enough to have closed that station?

I believe closure of Deansgate was indeed part of those proposals.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top