• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Scotrail, Abellio and April

Status
Not open for further replies.

pdeaves

Established Member
Joined
14 Sep 2014
Messages
5,631
Location
Gateway to the South West
It has oft been said that Abellio stops running Scotrail from April with the Scottish operator of last resort taking over. Things have been quiet recently.

An article published 23 March at https://www.railwaygazette.com/uk/t...for-scottish-passenger-services/61227.article has this statement (regarding post-April operation):
Abellio and Serco will continue to receive payments to cover the difference between revenue and operating costs
Is the reference to Abellio a simple slip-up in the article, or will the company continue after all?
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

pdeaves

Established Member
Joined
14 Sep 2014
Messages
5,631
Location
Gateway to the South West
Abellio Scotrail Ltd, the current operator, is a subsidiary of Abellio (obviously!).
Scotrail Trains Ltd, previously understood to take over in April, is a subsidiary of Scottish Rail Holdings (ultimately Scottish government).
Scotrail Ltd, according to Companies House, was set up in 2010, dissolved in 2021 and was dormant the whole time. https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/SC372897
 

Davester50

Member
Joined
22 Feb 2021
Messages
709
Location
UK
From the noticeable clean patches on the doors, they've started the job of peeling off the operated by Abellio stickers.
 

MacCookie

Member
Joined
22 Oct 2010
Messages
219
It has oft been said that Abellio stops running Scotrail from April with the Scottish operator of last resort taking over. Things have been quiet recently.

An article published 23 March at https://www.railwaygazette.com/uk/t...for-scottish-passenger-services/61227.article has this statement (regarding post-April operation):

Is the reference to Abellio a simple slip-up in the article, or will the company continue after all?

The original press statement may be clearer:


Ministerial statement - Additional funding support for rail services​

The Emergency Measures Agreements, which temporarily varied the terms of the franchise agreement with Serco and Abellio ScotRail, expired on 28 February 2022. New arrangements are necessary to maintain rail services beyond this date.
A Temporary Measures Agreement (TMA) has been put in place for Abellio ScotRail which will ensure the continuation of passenger services until 31 March 2022 ahead of the new arrangements for ScotRail Trains Ltd coming into effect on 1 April.
The new TMA for the Sleeper will be in place until 31 March 2023 and will ensure continuity of Caledonian Sleeper services and job security for staff throughout this period
Under the new agreements Serco and Abellio ScotRail will continue to receive payments to cover the difference between revenue and operating costs, assessed as necessary in light of the continuing impact of the pandemic on rail use, together with a small incentive payment linked strictly to good performance.
Transport Minister Jenny Gilruth said:
“Serco Caledonian Sleepers Limited has responded well to the lifting of Covid-related restrictions through 2021 and has mobilised to support the opening-up of Scotland’s tourism market. However it has not yet reached a stable financial position and that is why I have extended the current franchise support arrangements through a Temporary Measures Agreement.
“This TMA will run up until 31 March 2023 and will continue to protect rail services and support Sleeper staff through this period. I have also put in place a short-term agreement for Abellio ScotRail until 31 March ahead of the new arrangements on 1 April.
“These short-term measures will allow us to better understand the wider market and post-Covid recovery. They will also help maintain value for money through the current franchise and allow us to focus on our immediate industry priorities which includes the long-term stability of all our rail services.”
 

Davester50

Member
Joined
22 Feb 2021
Messages
709
Location
UK
It looks grotty. At least First actually cleaned the filthy surroundings when they stripped the logos off.
Sums up the Abellio term, and the governance of them and their franchise.
Funny to think back in fond terms of First, but they actually ran ScotRail considerably better than this lot ever have.
 

Scotrail314209

Established Member
Joined
1 Feb 2017
Messages
2,356
Location
Edinburgh
Sums up the Abellio term, and the governance of them and their franchise.
Funny to think back in fond terms of First, but they actually ran ScotRail considerably better than this lot ever have.
They were good really. Their Commonwealth Games timetable was absolutely flawless. Abellio would probably just add extra carriages and call it a day.
 

mcmad

Member
Joined
11 Mar 2015
Messages
979
I do wonder how much was Abellio's fault and how much the dead hand of Transport Scotland. I know of some baffling decisions from the latter, where the NR and Scotrail staff in the meeting just looked at each other and raised eyebrows.
 

Davester50

Member
Joined
22 Feb 2021
Messages
709
Location
UK
I do wonder how much was Abellio's fault and how much the dead hand of Transport Scotland.
I think that's a very good point.
How many of TS will still be making key decisions in the Brave New World of public ownership? And what will really change (for the better)?
 

Blindtraveler

Established Member
Joined
28 Feb 2011
Messages
9,682
Location
Nowhere near enough to a Pacer :(
First were far better with ScotRail then abellio have ever been. Although it's been pointed out that transport Scotland may well have had a hand in this I still think a lot of the problems have been strictly abellio. That having been said, the new arrangements don't exactly fill me with confidence
 

John Bishop

Member
Joined
15 Nov 2018
Messages
585
Location
Perth
I think that's a very good point.
How many of TS will still be making key decisions in the Brave New World of public ownership? And what will really change (for the better)?
Don’t hold your breath for any earth shattering improvements. Unfortunately the history and past record of TS is not pretty and riddled with incompetence at most levels. Let’s see how they deal with the forthcoming pay talks, that will be their first true test of performance. I suspect there may be trouble ahead!
 

Blindtraveler

Established Member
Joined
28 Feb 2011
Messages
9,682
Location
Nowhere near enough to a Pacer :(
I'm inclined to agree. Transport Scotland had the potential to be BA real force for good but bungling incompetence and people playing at knowing about anything transport and travel related seems to be the order of the day most of the time. Occasionally they play an absolute blinder and you wonder exactly where they dug the manager who played it up from and what happened to them afterwards
 

Blindtraveler

Established Member
Joined
28 Feb 2011
Messages
9,682
Location
Nowhere near enough to a Pacer :(
Loving your work there my friend.


Seriously though, I wonder what staff morale and industrial relations will be like under the New order? Reading between the lines I got the impression that abellio was not the happiest of ships to sail on from an employee's point of view


See what I did there?
 

John Bishop

Member
Joined
15 Nov 2018
Messages
585
Location
Perth
Loving your work there my friend.


Seriously though, I wonder what staff morale and industrial relations will be like under the New order? Reading between the lines I got the impression that abellio was not the happiest of ships to sail on from an employee's point of view


See what I did there?
The reality is, for the staff at the coalface, day to day management is still the same people in their posts, some good, some not so good, some awful. The only change is at a very high level of management.
 

tbtc

Veteran Member
Joined
16 Dec 2008
Messages
17,882
Location
Reston City Centre
I do wonder how much was Abellio's fault and how much the dead hand of Transport Scotland

As a Northern Rail passenger (brought up in Scotland), I'd be careful what you wish for - the publicly operated Northern has been worse than the Arriva/ Serco/ Abellio/ Arriva franchises - but a lot of people are more focussed on political ideals than the boring practicalities of running a train service well, so they tend to get away with it

Then again, we live in a world where the Green Party came to (joint) power and imposed some big cuts in train services...

"Ferry" good point.

Nice
 

Nicholas Lewis

Established Member
Joined
9 Aug 2019
Messages
6,133
Location
Surrey
As a Northern Rail passenger (brought up in Scotland), I'd be careful what you wish for - the publicly operated Northern has been worse than the Arriva/ Serco/ Abellio/ Arriva franchises - but a lot of people are more focussed on political ideals than the boring practicalities of running a train service well, so they tend to get away with it

Then again, we live in a world where the Green Party came to (joint) power and imposed some big cuts in train services...
Yup both points well stated.
 

Christmas

Member
Joined
10 Mar 2018
Messages
384
It appears that Abellio are not quite out of favour entirely as they are still providing rail replacement services and staff for ScotRail beyond 1st April.
 

InOban

Established Member
Joined
12 Mar 2017
Messages
4,221
I thought that the lead for rail in Transport Scotland is Bill Reeve, and that he had a rail background? Seemed a decent guy when I've met him.
 

Bald Rick

Veteran Member
Joined
28 Sep 2010
Messages
29,218
I thought that the lead for rail in Transport Scotland is Bill Reeve, and that he had a rail background? Seemed a decent guy when I've met him.

Decent guy. But he has to do what Ministers want him to do. And presumably there’s no money.
 

Bald Rick

Veteran Member
Joined
28 Sep 2010
Messages
29,218
Pre-pandemic, there always seemed to (me at least) be plenty of money for road schemes, while rail expansions like the Borders were pruned.

Scotland’s railway has done very, very well for rail investment the last decade and a half.

The Borders railway would not have been built anywhere else in the U.K., and wouldn’t be built in Scotland now if it were to be proposed now. Scotland is very lucky to have it, due to an alignment of two specific political issues, a very determined politician, and a desire to put one over Westminster.
 
Last edited:

Scotrail314209

Established Member
Joined
1 Feb 2017
Messages
2,356
Location
Edinburgh
Scotland’s railway has done very, very well for rail investment the last decade and a half.

The Borders railway would not have been built anywhere else in the U.K., and wouldn’t be built in Scotland now if it were to be proposed now. Scotland is very lucky to have it, due to an alignment of two specific political issues, a very determined politician, and a desire to put one over Westminster.
It's just a shame they seem to want to cut frequencies, which will make investment go to waste.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top