• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Shape of tunnel

Status
Not open for further replies.

taepn

Member
Joined
16 Dec 2017
Messages
17
hello everyone,
could you recommend the suitable shape of the railway tunnel to allow the train on double track dive under another train on above ground?
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

furnessvale

Established Member
Joined
14 Jul 2015
Messages
4,732
hello everyone,
could you recommend the suitable shape of the railway tunnel to allow the train on double track dive under another train on above ground?
The way you describe things tells me that the overall construction depth of the lines diving under needs to be kept to a minimum.

If that is the case, my initial thought would be to consider twin single bores for the dive under which should deliver a reduced construction depth compared to a double tracked bore. Either option would normally be circular cross section, possibly concrete segments/

Alternatively, you could consider cut and cover, building what is effectively a bridge over the diving lines. This bridge could be beams on concrete abutments which would deliver the smallest construction depth.
 

Tio Terry

Member
Joined
2 May 2014
Messages
1,189
Location
Spain
hello everyone,
could you recommend the suitable shape of the railway tunnel to allow the train on double track dive under another train on above ground?

I think you would benefit from reading the Technical Specifications for Interoperability, in particular those applicable to Safety in Railway Tunnels, Energy and Persons of reduced mobility. All of those have some influence on the design of a tunnel.
 

najaB

Veteran Member
Joined
28 Aug 2011
Messages
32,285
Location
Scotland
Alternatively, you could consider cut and cover, building what is effectively a bridge over the diving lines. This bridge could be beams on concrete abutments which would deliver the smallest construction depth.
Suggestion seconded. All things being equal it's easier to build over a railway than under it.
 

furnessvale

Established Member
Joined
14 Jul 2015
Messages
4,732
It depends also on how you build the tunnel underneath, what the ground is like you are tunneling through and if you want to keep the railway above open or not ..
Indeed, the original question is in the "how long is a piece of string" category.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top