• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Shrinkflation - examples?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Mcr Warrior

Veteran Member
Joined
8 Jan 2009
Messages
14,951
And the shelf edge labels still show the price per litre, - or don't you bother to look at that?
Tesco or Sainsbury's or Asda or Marks & Spencer milk, in this fairly small size, is 90p per pint, or £1.58 per litre.

Morrison's offering is 90p per 500ml, or £1.80 per litre.
 

AM9

Veteran Member
Joined
13 May 2014
Messages
15,291
Location
St Albans
Tesco or Sainsbury's or Asda or Marks & Spencer milk, in this fairly small size, is 90p per pint, or £1.58 per litre.
Morrison's offering is 90p per 500ml, or £1.80 per litre.
You obviously pay attention to the volume information. For those that can't do the calculations in their head, there's the shelf edge label that gives the price per litre, i.e. no dodgy volume or price breaks, just a single simple price that can be easily compared between different sizes, types and brands.
For those that choose not to use the information, there's the rather pointless act of crying out "shrinkflation" a label that a tabloid invented to sell papers full of rants about in inevitable consequences of inflation.
 

Mcr Warrior

Veteran Member
Joined
8 Jan 2009
Messages
14,951
'Caveat emptor'. Might be legal, but it's somewhat sharp practice and very liable to catch out the unwary. :rolleyes:
 

davehsug

Member
Joined
8 Jul 2014
Messages
301
And the shelf edge labels still show the price per litre, - or don't you bother to look at that?
Nope I don't. Excuse my stupidity, I just expect what seems to be pints of milk to be, well, a pint of milk. Strangely, I am an avid checker of "price per" when I'm comparing pack sizes for value.
Just noticed your above rant about people not being ripped off because they buy he same product that they've always bought, and don't think to check that they're getting less than they always have. It does come across as rather smug, and exactly what the supermarkets say when challenged on their sharp practice.
 

AM9

Veteran Member
Joined
13 May 2014
Messages
15,291
Location
St Albans
'Caveat emptor'. Might be legal, but it's somewhat sharp practice and very liable to catch out the unwary. :rolleyes:
"Sharp practice" is a subjective term. As @DarloRich says above, 'it's capitalism'. Othe countries with alternative economies are available

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==

Nope I don't. Excuse my stupidity, I just expect what seems to be pints of milk to be, well, a pint of milk. Strangely, I am an avid checker of "price per" when I'm comparing pack sizes for value.
Just noticed your above rant about people not being ripped off because they buy he same product that they've always bought, and don't think to check that they're getting less than they always have. It does come across as rather smug, and exactly what the supermarkets say when challenged on their sharp practice.
This part of the thread was discussing Morrison's decision to change the package of 1 pint of milk in a plastic bottle to a waxe card carton with 500ml in. Even if the change in volume was not visually obvious, the completely different packaging certainly was. Anyone really concerned with the cost of basic food products would check the new package including the stated volume of product that it contained.
 
Last edited:

Mcr Warrior

Veteran Member
Joined
8 Jan 2009
Messages
14,951
"Sharp practice" is a subjective term. As @DarloRich says above, 'it's capitalism'. Othe countries with alternative economies are available

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==
This part of the thread was discussing Morrison's decision to change the package of 1 pint of milk in a plastic bottle to a waxe card carton with 500ml in. Even if the change in volume was not visually obvious, the completely different packaging certainly was. Anyone really concerned with the cost of basic food products would check the new package including the stated volume of product that it contained.
But would they? As mentioned upthread, the Morrison's PR guff at the time of the change was all about their use of alternative packaging. The fact that they were now charging the same price, but for only 500ml of product, that just about everyone else was charging for 568ml of product, was conveniently ignored/glossed over. Which seems to me to be a classic example of 'Shrinkflation'. Not really sure why you're endeavouring to defend this.
 

gg1

Established Member
Joined
2 Jun 2011
Messages
2,243
Location
Birmingham
Asda have effectively increased the price of their 'extra special' thick sliced ham by 25%, the packs now contain 4 slices rather than 5.

The packs are of course the same size so as an added bonus you now also get 25% more single use plastic too.
 

Mcr Warrior

Veteran Member
Joined
8 Jan 2009
Messages
14,951
Asda have effectively increased the price of their 'extra special' thick sliced ham by 25%, the packs now contain 4 slices rather than 5.

The packs are of course the same size so as an added bonus you now also get 25% more single use plastic too.
Is the price per pack still the same and the weight per pack also the same, which might mean even thicker slices, or has the latter (i.e. the weight per pack) also now been reduced by ~ 25%, commensurate with the reduced number of slices?
 

gg1

Established Member
Joined
2 Jun 2011
Messages
2,243
Location
Birmingham
Is the price per pack still the same and the weight per pack also the same, which might mean even thicker slices, or has the latter (i.e. the weight per pack) also now been reduced by ~ 25%, commensurate with the reduced number of slices?
I don't have an old pack of 5 to compare the weights but the slices seem to be around the same size as previously.
 

Mcr Warrior

Veteran Member
Joined
8 Jan 2009
Messages
14,951
I don't have an old pack of 5 to compare the weights but the slices seem to be around the same size as previously.
Think the (Asda ham slices) pack weight may possibly have reduced from 130g to 120g in the recent past.
 

AM9

Veteran Member
Joined
13 May 2014
Messages
15,291
Location
St Albans
But would they? As mentioned upthread, the Morrison's PR guff at the time of the change was all about their use of alternative packaging. The fact that they were now charging the same price, but for only 500ml of product, that just about everyone else was charging for 568ml of product, was conveniently ignored/glossed over. Which seems to me to be a classic example of 'Shrinkflation'. Not really sure why you're endeavouring to defend this.
In a capitalist market, shops can put out whatever PR they want, and generally there is no obligation to point out thing that may show the product in a poor light. I'm not defending it, just pointing out that those who ignore the mandated information on the shelf edge label (which took legislation to establish) tend to be the ones that get need to look at it the most. The retailers resisted the introduction of the information, which is provided in the shopper's interest, which means that so many buyers are just not interested until somebody else points it out and complain when somebody (typically newspapers) pointout what they ignored.
 

Butts

Veteran Member
Joined
16 Jan 2011
Messages
11,595
Location
Stirlingshire
Noticed this morning in Tesco that both Anchor and Lurpak have "enhanced" their small butter packs from 250g to 200g o_O

Tesco's own Butter is still in the old 250g size and cheaper than either of the above
 

Baxenden Bank

Established Member
Joined
23 Oct 2013
Messages
4,306
Noticed this morning in Tesco that both Anchor and Lurpak have "enhanced" their small butter packs from 250g to 200g o_O

Tesco's own Butter is still in the old 250g size and cheaper than either of the above
That's not the full story. The formulation of the product has changed. You are now paying the same price (£9.00 per kg for the 500g now 400g Anchor tub) for 4% more water!

Previously (and still stated for the 750g tubs):
Anchor Butter (50%) (Milk), Rapeseed Oil (33%), Water, Salt (1.1%), Colour (Beta Carotene), Blended Spread 74% (41% Milk Fat, 33% Rapeseed Oil)

New (as stated for 500g tubs):
Anchor Butter (50%) (Milk), Rapeseed Oil (29%), Water, Salt (1.1%), Colour (Beta Carotene), Blended Spread 70% (41% Milk Fat, 29% Rapeseed Oil)

Whether you prefer water or rapeseed oil is personal preference of course. Personally if I wanted water on my toast I would run it under the tap!

As one poster will soon say: the information is available it's everyone's fault for not studying labels more closely!

Details remained available yesterday on the Morrisons website where the old 500g tubs are listed but 'out of stock'. Tesco removed them a while back, including from 'my favourites' despite me keep buying packs to add it back. That is what attracted me to the probable product change but I thought it would just be a resize to 450g.
 

Halwynd

Member
Joined
11 Sep 2021
Messages
441
Location
North West
Noticed this morning in Tesco that both Anchor and Lurpak have "enhanced" their small butter packs from 250g to 200g o_O

Tesco's own Butter is still in the old 250g size and cheaper than either of the above

I can't remember where it was but I arrived home a few months ago to find that one shop had reduced the size of its small own brand packs of real butter - not the spreadable 'butter' - from 250g to 227g. It was a crafty ploy and I didn't even notice.

Having been turned over, it really spoiled the enjoyment of my hot buttered crumpets that night and I have vowed never to fall for the butter sting again. If it isn't 250g I'll go without. :lol:
 

AM9

Veteran Member
Joined
13 May 2014
Messages
15,291
Location
St Albans
I can't remember where it was but I arrived home a few months ago to find that one shop had reduced the size of its small own brand packs of real butter - not the spreadable 'butter' - from 250g to 227g. It was a crafty ploy and I didn't even notice.

Having been turned over, it really spoiled the enjoyment of my hot buttered crumpets that night and I have vowed never to fall for the butter sting again. If it isn't 250g I'll go without. :lol:
That will please the imperial measure dinosaurs, 227 is 8 oz. :rolleyes:.
 

Mcr Warrior

Veteran Member
Joined
8 Jan 2009
Messages
14,951
So, an approximately 9% reduction in pack size, from 250g to 227g, with the price charged presumably staying the same, is deemed to be a good thing. Lummy! :s
 

AM9

Veteran Member
Joined
13 May 2014
Messages
15,291
Location
St Albans
So, an approximately 9% reduction in pack size, from 250g to 227g, with the price charged presumably staying the same, is deemed to be a good thing. Lummy! :s
Brexiteers have very tainted views of relative benefits and disbenefits. :rolleyes:
 

yorksrob

Veteran Member
Joined
6 Aug 2009
Messages
41,793
Location
Yorks
This year's tub of Cadbury's Roses has declined from 600g previously to 550g.
 

AM9

Veteran Member
Joined
13 May 2014
Messages
15,291
Location
St Albans
it used to be 1KG (2.2lbs) and the selection was a lot better with proper wrappers.
If by proper wrappers you mean those made of plastic, then although I rarely have anything like that, I'm glad that they are making serious attempts to reduce the cause of micro-plastic contamination.
 

Butts

Veteran Member
Joined
16 Jan 2011
Messages
11,595
Location
Stirlingshire
If by proper wrappers you mean those made of plastic, then although I rarely have anything like that, I'm glad that they are making serious attempts to reduce the cause of micro-plastic contamination.

Forget the micro-plastic contamination the variety in whatever wrapping has been decimated.

The little individually wrapped Bournville and CDM ones amongst many :'(
 

yorksrob

Veteran Member
Joined
6 Aug 2009
Messages
41,793
Location
Yorks
If by proper wrappers you mean those made of plastic, then although I rarely have anything like that, I'm glad that they are making serious attempts to reduce the cause of micro-plastic contamination.

Roses used to contain a selection of foil and paper wrappers as well as plastic ones. Now they've gone completely over to plastic which also uses more space.

It will be interesting to do a similar comparison on Quality Street.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top