Skimpot flyer
Established Member
- Joined
- 16 Nov 2012
- Messages
- 1,619
What’s incorrect about it is a guard can demand proof of exemption as much as they like. The regulations specifically state that evidence of exemption is not required to be produced. Therefore, it is disgusting that any railway employee leaps to the conclusion that someone travelling without a face-covering is ‘refusing to comply’.If not exempt, what's incorrect about that?
Only if the person starts stating that they won’t wear one can any action be taken